Braddell Brothers

Braddell Brothers is a law firm operating in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2013. The firm has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Supported by a team of 9 counsels. The firm demonstrates particular expertise in corporate law and easements. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 40% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Braddell Brothers has demonstrated expertise across 8 primary practice areas, with significant experience in business litigation and contracts.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Business Litigation	1 cases	12.5% of total caseload	Experienced60.00% relevance score	Braddell Brothers has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 12.5% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	12.5% of total caseload	General Practice30.00% relevance score	Braddell Brothers has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 12.5% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	12.5% of total caseload	Experienced65.00% relevance score	Braddell Brothers has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 12.5% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	12.5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75.00% relevance score	Braddell Brothers has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 12.5% of their total caseload.
Easements	1 cases	12.5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95.00% relevance score	Braddell Brothers has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 12.5% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	12.5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75.00% relevance score	Braddell Brothers has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 12.5% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	12.5% of total caseload	Experienced65.00% relevance score	Braddell Brothers has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 12.5% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	12.5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95.00% relevance score	Braddell Brothers has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 12.5% of their total caseload.

Legal Team and Representation

Braddell Brothers has 9 notable counsels who have represented clients in various cases. The most active counsel has handled 3 cases.

Counsel Name	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Lye Hui Xian	3 cases	60.0% of firm's cases	2013 sghc 107(May 2013) 2010 sghc 268(Sep 2010)
Edmund Kronenburg	2 cases	40.0% of firm's cases	2013 sghc 107(May 2013) 2010 sghc 64(Feb 2010)
Edmund J Kronenburg	1 cases	20.0% of firm's cases	2010 sghc 268(Sep 2010)
Leong Kit Wan	1 cases	20.0% of firm's cases	2010 sghc 268(Sep 2010)
Joan Sim	1 cases	20.0% of firm's cases	2010 sghc 268(Sep 2010)
Charmaine Cheong	1 cases	20.0% of firm's cases	2010 sghc 64(Feb 2010)
Wan Mew Lin Margaret	1 cases	20.0% of firm's cases	2005 sghc 23(Jan 2005)
Harry Wee	1 cases	20.0% of firm's cases	2001 sghc 161(Jun 2001)
Andrew Ho	1 cases	20.0% of firm's cases	2001 sghc 161(Jun 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Braddell Brothers's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.9
Complex Cases: 2 (40%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	54.9 parties avg	4.9	100.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	26.6 parties avg	6.6
2013	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Braddell Brothers's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(100.0%)	100.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	02 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2013	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Represented Parties

List of parties represented by Braddell Brothers in various cases

Party Name	Role	Cases	Outcomes
Maxz Universal Development Group Pte LtdDefendant, Plaintiff Lost (2)	Defendant, Plaintiff	2 cases	Lost (2)
Eng Tet HwaDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Ng Choon HuayDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Mohamed Hiraz HassimAppellant Lost (1)	Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)
Management Corporation Strata Title No 938Defendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)