David Nayar and Vardan

David Nayar and Vardan is a law firm operating in Singapore. With documented cases from 2006 to 2014. The firm has handled 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Supported by a team of 2 counsels. The firm demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration. Their track record shows a 12.5% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

David Nayar and Vardan has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in property law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Property Law	4 cases	16.0% of total caseload	General Practice41.25% relevance score	David Nayar and Vardan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 16.0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	12.0% of total caseload	General Practice41.67% relevance score	David Nayar and Vardan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 12.0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	8.0% of total caseload	General Practice30.00% relevance score	David Nayar and Vardan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8.0% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	8.0% of total caseload	General Practice35.00% relevance score	David Nayar and Vardan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8.0% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	8.0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90.00% relevance score	David Nayar and Vardan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8.0% of their total caseload.
Agency and Distributorships	1 cases	4.0% of total caseload	General Practice10.00% relevance score	David Nayar and Vardan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4.0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	4.0% of total caseload	Experienced50.00% relevance score	David Nayar and Vardan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4.0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	4.0% of total caseload	General Practice20.00% relevance score	David Nayar and Vardan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4.0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	4.0% of total caseload	General Practice30.00% relevance score	David Nayar and Vardan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4.0% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	4.0% of total caseload	Experienced60.00% relevance score	David Nayar and Vardan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Team and Representation

David Nayar and Vardan has 2 notable counsels who have represented clients in various cases. The most active counsel has handled 4 cases.

Counsel Name	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
David Nayar	4 cases	50.0% of firm's cases	2014 sgca 2(Jan 2014) 2013 sghc 46(Feb 2013) 2011 sgca 15(Apr 2011)
John Thomas	4 cases	50.0% of firm's cases	2010 sghc 352(Dec 2010) 2009 sgca 45(Sep 2009) 2009 sghc 72(Mar 2009)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of David Nayar and Vardan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.4
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.7 parties avg	2.7	37.5%
Partial	32.3 parties avg	2.3	37.5%
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	12.5%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	12.5%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2014	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of David Nayar and Vardan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(37.5%)	37.5%
Partial	3(37.5%)	37.5%
Neutral	1(12.5%)	12.5%
Won	1(12.5%)	12.5%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	23182.02	4636.405 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2006	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	0111 111	Neutral: 1 cases (0.9%) Partial: 1 cases (0.9%) Won: 1 cases (0.9%)
2010	01 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	01 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Represented Parties

List of parties represented by David Nayar and Vardan in various cases

Party Name	Role	Cases	Outcomes
Cupid Jewels Pte LtdAppellant, Defendant, Applicant Lost (2)Partial (1)	Appellant, Defendant, Applicant	3 cases	Lost (2)Partial (1)
Acclaim Insurance Brokers Pte LtdDefendant, Respondent, Plaintiff Partial (2)Won (1)	Defendant, Respondent, Plaintiff	3 cases	Partial (2)Won (1)
P J Holdings IncPlaintiff Neutral (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Neutral (1)
Vardan Vasantha LakshmiRespondent Lost (1)	Respondent	1 case	Lost (1)