Drew and Napier

Drew and Napier is a law firm operating in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2005. The firm has handled 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Supported by a team of 10 counsels. The firm demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract and construction law. Their track record shows a 12.5% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Drew and Napier has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in agency and distributorships and asset protection.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Agency and Distributorships	1 cases	6.7% of total caseload	General Practice30.00% relevance score	Drew and Napier has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6.7% of their total caseload.
Asset Protection	1 cases	6.7% of total caseload	General Practice40.00% relevance score	Drew and Napier has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6.7% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	6.7% of total caseload	Experienced50.00% relevance score	Drew and Napier has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6.7% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	6.7% of total caseload	Experienced70.00% relevance score	Drew and Napier has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6.7% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	6.7% of total caseload	Experienced70.00% relevance score	Drew and Napier has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6.7% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	6.7% of total caseload	General Practice40.00% relevance score	Drew and Napier has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6.7% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	6.7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75.00% relevance score	Drew and Napier has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6.7% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	6.7% of total caseload	General Practice5.00% relevance score	Drew and Napier has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6.7% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	6.7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80.00% relevance score	Drew and Napier has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6.7% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	6.7% of total caseload	General Practice5.00% relevance score	Drew and Napier has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6.7% of their total caseload.

Legal Team and Representation

Drew and Napier has 10 notable counsels who have represented clients in various cases. The most active counsel has handled 3 cases.

Counsel Name	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Davinder Singh	3 cases	37.5% of firm's cases	2005 sgca 18(Apr 2005) 2004 sghc 115(May 2004)
Chia Voon Jiet	1 cases	12.5% of firm's cases	2004 sghc 63(Mar 2004)
Siraj Omar	1 cases	12.5% of firm's cases	2002 sghc 281(Nov 2002)
Kabir Singh	1 cases	12.5% of firm's cases	2004 sghc 115(May 2004)
Christopher Chuah	1 cases	12.5% of firm's cases	2004 sghc 60(Mar 2004)
Lawrence Tan	1 cases	12.5% of firm's cases	2004 sghc 60(Mar 2004)
Adrian Tan	1 cases	12.5% of firm's cases	2005 sgca 18(Apr 2005)
Dedar Singh Gill	1 cases	12.5% of firm's cases	2004 sghc 81(Apr 2004)
Tan Liam Beng	1 cases	12.5% of firm's cases	2004 sghc 62(Mar 2004)
Hri Kumar	1 cases	12.5% of firm's cases	2003 sghc 220(Sep 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Drew and Napier's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 9.7
Complex Cases: 4 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	44.6 parties avg	4.6	50.0%
Partial	25.5 parties avg	5.5	25.0%
Neutral	120.0 parties avg	20.0	12.5%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	12.5%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2003	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2004	510.9 parties avg	10.9
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Drew and Napier's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(50.0%)	50.0%
Partial	2(25.0%)	25.0%
Neutral	1(12.5%)	12.5%
Won	1(12.5%)	12.5%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	168742.12	5443.295 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	01 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	0311 311	Lost: 3 cases (1.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (0.3%) Partial: 1 cases (0.3%)
2005	01 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Represented Parties

List of parties represented by Drew and Napier in various cases

Party Name	Role	Cases	Outcomes
Ban Song Long DavidRespondent Won (1)	Respondent	1 case	Won (1)
ASO I (Delaware) LLCPlaintiff Neutral (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Neutral (1)
Columbia / HCA Master Retirement TrustPlaintiff Neutral (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Neutral (1)
Gryphon Domestic VI, LLCPlaintiff Neutral (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Neutral (1)
OCM Emerging Markets Fund, LPPlaintiff Neutral (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Neutral (1)
OCM Opportunities Fund II, LPPlaintiff Neutral (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Neutral (1)
McDonald's CorpOpponent, Appellant Lost (1)	Opponent, Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)
Bahaeddine BassatnePlaintiff Partial (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Partial (1)
Mohamed BassatnePlaintiff Partial (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Partial (1)
Walid BassatnePlaintiff Partial (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Partial (1)
Ng Man HengDefendant, Appellant Lost (1)	Defendant, Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)
Puncak Maju Corporation Sdn BhdDefendant, Appellant Lost (1)	Defendant, Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)
Syarikat Kesenangan Sdn BhdDefendant, Appellant Lost (1)	Defendant, Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)
Syarikat Permata Gemilang Sdn BhdDefendant, Appellant Lost (1)	Defendant, Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)
Chan Hong Seng Engineering and Construction Pte LtdPlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
Goh Lan KiawDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Loh Kim HerDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Hotel Equatorial (S) Pte LimitedDefendant Partial (1)	Defendant	1 case	Partial (1)
Ong Yew HuatDefendant Partial (1)	Defendant	1 case	Partial (1)