Drew & Napier LLP
Drew & Napier LLP is a law firm operating in Singapore. With documented cases from 2009 to 2015. The firm has handled 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Supported by a team of 10 counsels. The firm demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract and civil practice. Their track record shows a 62.5% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 37.5% of their total caseload.
Areas of Practice and Expertise
Drew & Napier LLP has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and banking and finance.
Practice Area | Case Volume |
---|---|
Breach of Contract | 2 cases |
Banking and Finance | 2 cases |
Bankruptcy | 1 cases |
Child Custody | 1 cases |
Child Support | 1 cases |
Civil Practice | 1 cases |
Divorce | 1 cases |
Family Law | 1 cases |
International Arbitration | 1 cases |
Recognition of Foreign Judgments | 1 cases |
Legal Team and Representation
Drew & Napier LLP has 10 notable counsels who have represented clients in various cases. The most active counsel has handled 3 cases.
Counsel Name | Cases Handled |
---|---|
Rakesh Kirpalani | 3 cases |
Arvindran Manoosegaran | 3 cases |
Indranee Rajah | 3 cases |
Hri Kumar Nair | 2 cases |
Tan Shou Min | 2 cases |
Ruby Tham | 1 cases |
Teo Chun-Wei Benedict | 1 cases |
Gill Dedar Singh | 1 cases |
Choo Tse Yun | 1 cases |
Wendell Wong | 1 cases |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Drew & Napier LLP's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 7.2
- Complex Cases
- 3 (37.5%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Won | 58.3 parties avg |
Partial | 34.7 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2009 | 211.4 parties avg |
2010 | 35.6 parties avg |
2013 | 22.0 parties avg |
2015 | 12.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Drew & Napier LLP's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Won | 5(62.5%) |
Partial | 3(37.5%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 100.001 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2009 | 02 2 |
2010 | 012 12 |
2013 | 011 11 |
2015 | 01 1 |
Represented Parties
List of parties represented by Drew & Napier LLP in various cases
Party Name | Cases |
---|---|
Rockline LtdPlaintiff Partial (1)Won (2) | 3 cases |
Superon International LimitedPlaintiff Won (2) | 2 cases |
ARXPlaintiff Partial (1) | 1 case |
BLBPlaintiff Partial (1) | 1 case |
Global Distressed Alpha Fund I Limited PartnershipPlaintiff, Judgment Creditor, Respondent Won (1) | 1 case |
SuperonPlaintiff Partial (1) | 1 case |
Ozone Community CorpAppellant Won (1) | 1 case |
Asia Atlas LimitedPlaintiff Won (1) | 1 case |
Schroder Asian Property Managers Limited as General Partner of Schroder Asian Properties L.P.Plaintiff Won (1) | 1 case |
National University of SingaporeDefendant, Respondent Won (1) | 1 case |
Case History
Displaying all 8 cases
Case |
---|
26 Feb 2015 ARXPartial |
29 Sep 2013 BLBPartial |
15 Jan 2013 Global Distressed Alpha Fund I Limited PartnershipWon |
25 Aug 2010 Rockline LtdPartial SuperonPartial |
25 Apr 2010 Rockline LtdWon Superon International LimitedWon |
14 Jan 2010 Ozone Community CorpWon |
16 Sep 2009 Asia Atlas LimitedWon Rockline LtdWon Schroder Asian Property Managers Limited as General Partner of Schroder Asian Properties L.P.Won Superon International LimitedWon |
15 Jun 2009 National University of SingaporeWon |