Engelin Teh & Partners

Engelin Teh & Partners is a law firm operating in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2001. The firm has handled 17 cases in Singapore's courts. Supported by a team of 10 counsels. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 6 complex cases, representing 35.3% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Engelin Teh & Partners has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and administrative law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Contract	6 cases	15.0% of total caseload	General Practice38.89% relevance score	Engelin Teh & Partners has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 15.0% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	3 cases	7.5% of total caseload	Experienced56.67% relevance score	Engelin Teh & Partners has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7.5% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	5.0% of total caseload	Experienced63.33% relevance score	Engelin Teh & Partners has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5.0% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	5.0% of total caseload	General Practice34.50% relevance score	Engelin Teh & Partners has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5.0% of their total caseload.
Copyrights	2 cases	5.0% of total caseload	Experienced52.50% relevance score	Engelin Teh & Partners has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5.0% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	2 cases	5.0% of total caseload	Experienced74.00% relevance score	Engelin Teh & Partners has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5.0% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	2.5% of total caseload	Experienced70.00% relevance score	Engelin Teh & Partners has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2.5% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	2.5% of total caseload	Experienced70.00% relevance score	Engelin Teh & Partners has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2.5% of their total caseload.
Child Support	1 cases	2.5% of total caseload	Experienced60.00% relevance score	Engelin Teh & Partners has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2.5% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	2.5% of total caseload	General Practice30.00% relevance score	Engelin Teh & Partners has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2.5% of their total caseload.

Legal Team and Representation

Engelin Teh & Partners has 10 notable counsels who have represented clients in various cases. The most active counsel has handled 5 cases.

Counsel Name	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Thomas Sim	5 cases	29.4% of firm's cases	2001 sghc 172(Jul 2001) 2001 sghc 134(Jun 2001) 2000 sgca 23(Apr 2000)
Engelin Teh	5 cases	29.4% of firm's cases	2001 sghc 138(Jun 2001) 2001 sghc 134(Jun 2001) 2000 sgca 23(Apr 2000)
Harish Kumar	3 cases	17.6% of firm's cases	2001 sghc 172(Jul 2001) 2001 sgca 44(Jun 2001) 2000 sgca 35(Jul 2000)
Chan Jin Han	2 cases	11.8% of firm's cases	2001 sghc 382(Dec 2001)
Sim Yuan Po Thomas	2 cases	11.8% of firm's cases	2001 sgca 50(Jul 2001) 2001 sgca 44(Jun 2001)
Daniel Koh	2 cases	11.8% of firm's cases	2001 sghc 349(Nov 2001) 2001 sghc 346(Nov 2001)
Thomas Lei	2 cases	11.8% of firm's cases	2000 sgca 65(Nov 2000) 2000 sghc 213(Oct 2000)
B M Singh	2 cases	11.8% of firm's cases	2001 sghc 382(Dec 2001)
Joanna Tan	1 cases	5.9% of firm's cases	2000 sgca 35(Jul 2000)
Juliana Lee	1 cases	5.9% of firm's cases	2000 sgca 17(Mar 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Engelin Teh & Partners's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 10.4
Complex Cases: 6 (35.3%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	810.4 parties avg	10.4	40.0%
Won	59.6 parties avg	9.6	25.0%
Dismissed	313.3 parties avg	13.3	15.0%
Partial	34.3 parties avg	4.3	15.0%
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	5.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	85.5 parties avg	5.5
2001	912.0 parties avg	12.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Engelin Teh & Partners's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	8(40.0%)	40.0%
Won	5(25.0%)	25.0%
Dismissed	3(15.0%)	15.0%
Partial	3(15.0%)	15.0%
Neutral	1(5.0%)	5.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1111700996.0	17103092.2511 cases	11
USD	2000000	2000000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	01322 1322	Dismissed: 1 cases (0.1%) Lost: 3 cases (0.2%) Partial: 2 cases (0.2%) Won: 2 cases (0.2%)
2001	025113 25113	Dismissed: 2 cases (0.0%) Lost: 5 cases (0.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (0.0%) Partial: 1 cases (0.0%) Won: 3 cases (0.0%)

Represented Parties

List of parties represented by Engelin Teh & Partners in various cases

Party Name	Role	Cases	Outcomes
Tong Tien SeeDefendant, Appellant, Defendant Lost (2)	Defendant, Appellant, Defendant	2 cases	Lost (2)
YugiantoroRespondent, Plaintiff Won (2)	Respondent, Plaintiff	2 cases	Won (2)
Thomson Plaza (Pte) LtdApplicant, Appellant Lost (1)Neutral (1)	Applicant, Appellant	2 cases	Lost (1)Neutral (1)
Yamazaki Construction (S) Pte LtdRespondent, Defendant, Appellant Lost (2)	Respondent, Defendant, Appellant	2 cases	Lost (2)
SM Summit Holdings LtdRespondent, Plaintiff, Respondent Dismissed (1)Won (1)	Respondent, Plaintiff, Respondent	2 cases	Dismissed (1)Won (1)
Summit CD Manufacture Pte LtdRespondent, Plaintiff, Respondent Dismissed (1)Won (1)	Respondent, Plaintiff, Respondent	2 cases	Dismissed (1)Won (1)
Caltong (Australia) Pty Ltd (formerly known as Tong Tien See Holding (Austalia) Pty Ltd)Defendant, Appellant Won (1)	Defendant, Appellant	1 case	Won (1)
Chia Siew KengDefendant Dismissed (1)	Defendant	1 case	Dismissed (1)
Koo Yoke FongDefendant, Appellant Lost (1)	Defendant, Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)
Lee Han Chye, AlvinDefendant Dismissed (1)	Defendant	1 case	Dismissed (1)
Tong Development Pte LtdDefendant Won (1)	Defendant	1 case	Won (1)
Tong Hui Chee, AngelaDefendant, Appellant Lost (1)	Defendant, Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)
Tong Hui Chuen, CarolDefendant Dismissed (1)	Defendant	1 case	Dismissed (1)
Tong Hui Fung, CindyDefendant Dismissed (1)	Defendant	1 case	Dismissed (1)
Tong Hui Li, LindaDefendant Dismissed (1)	Defendant	1 case	Dismissed (1)
Tong Joo Aik Construction Pte LtdDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Wei Fong Rasiah, SallyDefendant, Appellant Won (1)	Defendant, Appellant	1 case	Won (1)
Eighth defendantDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Eleventh DefendantDefendant Dismissed (1)	Defendant	1 case	Dismissed (1)
Ninth DefendantDefendant Dismissed (1)	Defendant	1 case	Dismissed (1)
Second defendantDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Seventh defendantDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Sixth defendantDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Tenth DefendantDefendant Dismissed (1)	Defendant	1 case	Dismissed (1)
Third defendantDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Thirteenth DefendantDefendant Dismissed (1)	Defendant	1 case	Dismissed (1)
Twelfth DefendantDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Subbiah PillaiAppellant Lost (1)	Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)
Shoba D/O GunasekaranAppellant, Petitioner Partial (1)	Appellant, Petitioner	1 case	Partial (1)
De Souza Tay & Goh (suing as a firm)Plaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
Teo Seng KiatPlaintiff Partial (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Partial (1)
Combined Overseas Transport Sdn BhdAppellant, Respondent Partial (1)	Appellant, Respondent	1 case	Partial (1)
FriisAppellant, Respondent Partial (1)	Appellant, Respondent	1 case	Partial (1)
Tan Tiang Hin JerryAppellant Won (1)	Appellant	1 case	Won (1)
Goh Eng KeahDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Teo Keng KeongDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)

Case History

Displaying all 17 cases

Case

2001-sghc-382

30 Dec 2001

Caltong (Australia) Pty Ltd (formerly known as Tong Tien See Holding (Austalia) Pty Ltd)Won

Chia Siew KengDismissed

Koo Yoke FongLost

Lee Han Chye, AlvinDismissed

Tong Development Pte LtdWon

Tong Hui Chee, AngelaLost

Tong Hui Chuen, CarolDismissed

Tong Hui Fung, CindyDismissed

Tong Hui Li, LindaDismissed

Tong Joo Aik Construction Pte LtdLost

Tong Tien SeeLost

Wei Fong Rasiah, SallyWon

Won	Caltong (Australia) Pty Ltd (formerly known as Tong Tien See Holding (Austalia) Pty Ltd) (Defendant, Appellant): Declaration GrantedJudgment against the Eighth and the Twelfth Defendants for a declaration that they held $984,899.60 as constructive trustees for the Plaintiff company. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
Dismissed	Chia Siew Keng (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe Plaintiff company’s claims against the Fifth Defendant were dismissed.
Lost	Koo Yoke Fong (Defendant, Appellant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the Second Defendant for the loss/damage suffered by the Plaintiff company by reason of the conspiracy to injure by unlawful means in the sum of $53.3 million. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
Dismissed	Lee Han Chye, Alvin (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe Plaintiff company’s claims against the Thirteenth Defendant were dismissed.
Won	Tong Development Pte Ltd (Defendant): Declaration GrantedThe Plaintiff company was also given a declaration that the Seventh Defendant received $7 million from the Plaintiff company as constructive trustees and it should account for the use of this $7 million including the outstanding amount of $1.5 million. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
Lost	Tong Hui Chee, Angela (Defendant, Appellant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the Third Defendant for the loss/damage suffered by the Plaintiff company by reason of the conspiracy to injure by unlawful means in the sum of $53.3 million. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
Dismissed	Tong Hui Chuen, Carol (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe Plaintiff company’s claims against the Tenth Defendant were dismissed.
Dismissed	Tong Hui Fung, Cindy (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe Plaintiff company’s claims against the Eleventh Defendant were dismissed.
Dismissed	Tong Hui Li, Linda (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe Plaintiff company’s claims against the Ninth Defendant were dismissed.
Lost	Tong Joo Aik Construction Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the Sixth Defendant for the loss/damage suffered by the Plaintiff company by reason of the conspiracy to injure by unlawful means in the sum of $53.3 million. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
Lost	Tong Tien See (Defendant, Appellant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the First Defendant for the loss/damage suffered by the Plaintiff company by reason of the conspiracy to injure by unlawful means in the sum of $53.3 million. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
Won	Wei Fong Rasiah, Sally (Defendant, Appellant): Declaration GrantedJudgment against the Eighth and the Twelfth Defendants for a declaration that they held $984,899.60 as constructive trustees for the Plaintiff company. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.

2001-sghc-381

30 Dec 2001

Eighth defendantLost

Eleventh DefendantDismissed

Ninth DefendantDismissed

Second defendantLost

Seventh defendantLost

Sixth defendantLost

Tenth DefendantDismissed

Third defendantLost

Thirteenth DefendantDismissed

Tong Tien SeeLost

Twelfth DefendantLost

Lost	Eighth defendant (Defendant): Declaration against DefendantJudgment was ordered against the eighth defendant for a declaration that they held $984,899.60 as constructive trustees for the plaintiff company and that they should account to the plaintiff company for the said sum. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
Dismissed	Eleventh Defendant (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff company's claims against the eleventh defendant were dismissed. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
Dismissed	Ninth Defendant (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff company's claims against the ninth defendant were dismissed. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
Lost	Second defendant (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the second defendant for $53.3 million due to conspiracy to injure by unlawful means and breaches of fiduciary duty. Declaration that the second defendant was knowingly a party to the carrying on of the business of the plaintiff company with intent to defraud its creditors and that they were liable to the plaintiff company for the said $53.3m. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
Lost	Seventh defendant (Defendant): Declaration against DefendantThe plaintiff company was given a declaration that the seventh defendant received $7m from the plaintiff company as constructive trustees and it should account for the use of this $7m including the outstanding amount of $1.5m. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
Lost	Sixth defendant (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the sixth defendant for $53.3 million due to conspiracy to injure by unlawful means. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
Dismissed	Tenth Defendant (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff company's claims against the tenth defendant were dismissed. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
Lost	Third defendant (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the third defendant for $53.3 million due to conspiracy to injure by unlawful means and breaches of fiduciary duty. Declaration that the third defendant was knowingly a party to the carrying on of the business of the plaintiff company with intent to defraud its creditors and that they were liable to the plaintiff company for the said $53.3m. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
Dismissed	Thirteenth Defendant (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff company's claims against the thirteenth defendant were dismissed. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
Lost	Tong Tien See (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the first defendant for $53.3 million due to conspiracy to injure by unlawful means and breaches of fiduciary duty. Declaration that the first defendant was knowingly a party to the carrying on of the business of the plaintiff company with intent to defraud its creditors and that they were liable to the plaintiff company for the said $53.3m. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
Lost	Twelfth Defendant (Defendant): Declaration against DefendantJudgment was ordered against the twelfth defendant for a declaration that they held $984,899.60 as constructive trustees for the plaintiff company and that they should account to the plaintiff company for the said sum. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).