Fortis Law Corporation

Fortis Law Corporation is a law firm operating in Singapore. With documented cases from 2014 to 2024. The firm has handled 11 cases in Singapore's courts. Supported by a team of 10 counsels. The firm demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and mareva injunctions. Their track record shows a 9.1% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 18.2% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Fortis Law Corporation has demonstrated expertise across 9 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and property law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	4 cases	25.0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81.67% relevance score	Fortis Law Corporation has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 25.0% of their total caseload.
Property Law	3 cases	18.8% of total caseload	Experienced52.50% relevance score	Fortis Law Corporation has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 18.8% of their total caseload.
Family Law	3 cases	18.8% of total caseload	Experienced51.67% relevance score	Fortis Law Corporation has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 18.8% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	6.3% of total caseload	General Practice40.00% relevance score	Fortis Law Corporation has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6.3% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunctions	1 cases	6.3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95.00% relevance score	Fortis Law Corporation has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6.3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	6.3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75.00% relevance score	Fortis Law Corporation has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6.3% of their total caseload.
Taxation	1 cases	6.3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90.00% relevance score	Fortis Law Corporation has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6.3% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	6.3% of total caseload	Experienced60.00% relevance score	Fortis Law Corporation has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6.3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	6.3% of total caseload	Experienced60.00% relevance score	Fortis Law Corporation has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6.3% of their total caseload.

Legal Team and Representation

Fortis Law Corporation has 10 notable counsels who have represented clients in various cases. The most active counsel has handled 4 cases.

Counsel Name	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Nicholas Yong Yoong Han	4 cases	36.4% of firm's cases	2024 sghcf 9(Feb 2024) 2023 sghc 115(May 2023) 2023 sghc 107(Apr 2023)
Josephus Tan	2 cases	18.2% of firm's cases	2015 sghc 107(Apr 2015) 2015 sgca 1(Jan 2015)
Andrew Wong Wei Kiat	2 cases	18.2% of firm's cases	2024 sghcf 9(Feb 2024) 2021 sghc 138(Jun 2021)
Tan Tse Chia Patrick	2 cases	18.2% of firm's cases	2023 sghc 115(May 2023) 2021 sghc 138(Jun 2021)
Keith Lim	2 cases	18.2% of firm's cases	2015 sgca 1(Jan 2015) 2014 sghc 96(May 2014)
Goh Kim Thong Andrew	2 cases	18.2% of firm's cases	2018 sghc 102(Apr 2018) 2015 sghc 297(Nov 2015)
June Lim	1 cases	9.1% of firm's cases	2014 sghc 132(Jul 2014)
Josehus Tan	1 cases	9.1% of firm's cases	2014 sghc 96(May 2014)
Yip Jian Yang	1 cases	9.1% of firm's cases	2021 sghc 138(Jun 2021)
Caitlyn Wee	1 cases	9.1% of firm's cases	2021 sghc 138(Jun 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Fortis Law Corporation's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.1
Complex Cases: 2 (18.2%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	83.3 parties avg	3.3	72.7%
Dismissed	12.0 parties avg	2.0	9.1%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	9.1%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	9.1%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2014	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	32.6 parties avg	2.6
2018	25.0 parties avg	5.0
2021	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2023	23.3 parties avg	3.3
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Fortis Law Corporation's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	8(72.7%)	72.7%
Dismissed	1(9.1%)	9.1%
Partial	1(9.1%)	9.1%
Won	1(9.1%)	9.1%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	139453.0	23242.173 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2014	011 11	Dismissed: 1 cases (9.1%) Lost: 1 cases (9.1%)
2015	03 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)
2018	011 11	Lost: 1 cases (9.1%) Partial: 1 cases (9.1%)
2021	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	02 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2024	01 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Represented Parties

List of parties represented by Fortis Law Corporation in various cases

Party Name	Role	Cases	Outcomes
WPWRespondent Won (1)	Respondent	1 case	Won (1)
Ho Woon ChunClaimant Lost (1)	Claimant	1 case	Lost (1)
Chen ChangfengDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Chen FangqiDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Lin ShaohuaAppellant Lost (1)	Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)
Jarret PereiraPlaintiff Partial (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Partial (1)
Teo Kuei YangDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Wong Lee Vui @ Willie Wong Lee VuiPlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
MICHEAL ANAK GARINGDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Kho JabingRespondent Lost (1)	Respondent	1 case	Lost (1)
Sinwa SS (HK) Co LtdPlaintiff Dismissed (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Dismissed (1)
Ho Wei YiDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)