G R Law Corporation

G R Law Corporation is a law firm operating in Singapore. With documented cases from 2007 to 2013. The firm has handled 13 cases in Singapore's courts. Supported by a team of 5 counsels. The firm demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and divorce. They have managed 5 complex cases, representing 38.5% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

G R Law Corporation has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in arbitration and civil practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Arbitration	5 cases	19.2% of total caseload	Experienced74.17% relevance score	G R Law Corporation has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 19.2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	3 cases	11.5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80.00% relevance score	G R Law Corporation has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 11.5% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	3 cases	11.5% of total caseload	Experienced68.33% relevance score	G R Law Corporation has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 11.5% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	2 cases	7.7% of total caseload	Experienced70.00% relevance score	G R Law Corporation has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7.7% of their total caseload.
Divorce	2 cases	7.7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87.50% relevance score	G R Law Corporation has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7.7% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	7.7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95.00% relevance score	G R Law Corporation has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7.7% of their total caseload.
Land Law	2 cases	7.7% of total caseload	Experienced73.33% relevance score	G R Law Corporation has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7.7% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	7.7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76.67% relevance score	G R Law Corporation has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7.7% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	3.8% of total caseload	Experienced60.00% relevance score	G R Law Corporation has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3.8% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	3.8% of total caseload	Experienced65.00% relevance score	G R Law Corporation has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3.8% of their total caseload.

Legal Team and Representation

G R Law Corporation has 5 notable counsels who have represented clients in various cases. The most active counsel has handled 5 cases.

Counsel Name	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
G Raman	5 cases	38.5% of firm's cases	2012 sghc 55(Mar 2012) 2009 sghc 258(Nov 2009) 2009 sghc 220(Sep 2009)
Gopalan Raman	4 cases	30.8% of firm's cases	2013 sghc 10(Jan 2013) 2010 sghc 258(Aug 2010) 2009 sghc 154(Jul 2009)
Raman Gopalan	3 cases	23.1% of firm's cases	2008 sghc 200(Nov 2008) 2008 sghc 84(Jun 2008) 2008 sghc 63(Apr 2008)
Khaleel Namazie	1 cases	7.7% of firm's cases	2012 sghc 55(Mar 2012)
G.R. Raman	1 cases	7.7% of firm's cases	2011 sghc 53(Mar 2011)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of G R Law Corporation's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 5 (38.5%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	82.7 parties avg	2.7	61.5%
Partial	33.3 parties avg	3.3	23.1%
Neutral	24.0 parties avg	4.0	15.4%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2007	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2008	44.0 parties avg	4.0
2009	33.3 parties avg	3.3
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of G R Law Corporation's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	8(61.5%)	61.5%
Partial	3(23.1%)	23.1%
Neutral	2(15.4%)	15.4%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	9000	1285.716 cases	6
USD	13165.03	13165.031 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2007	02 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2008	022 22	Lost: 2 cases (9.1%) Neutral: 2 cases (9.1%)
2009	012 12	Lost: 1 cases (8.3%) Partial: 2 cases (16.7%)
2010	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	01 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Represented Parties

List of parties represented by G R Law Corporation in various cases

Party Name	Role	Cases	Outcomes
Khoo Cheng Neo NormaDefendant, Respondent, Defendant, Plaintiff, Appellant Lost (2)Neutral (2)	Defendant, Respondent, Defendant, Plaintiff, Appellant	4 cases	Lost (2)Neutral (2)
O'Connor Rosamund MonicaWife, Appellant, Plaintiff Lost (1)Partial (1)	Wife, Appellant, Plaintiff	2 cases	Lost (1)Partial (1)
Anwar SirajDefendant, Appellant, Plaintiff, Appellant Lost (2)	Defendant, Appellant, Plaintiff, Appellant	2 cases	Lost (2)
Profindo Pte LtdAppellant Partial (1)	Appellant	1 case	Partial (1)
Vijaykumar Nanalal Shah (executor of the estate of Nanalal Shamji Shah, deceased)Defendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Tan Pwee EngAppellant Lost (1)	Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)
DIntervener Partial (1)	Intervener	1 case	Partial (1)
Borissik SvetlanaApplicant Lost (1)	Applicant	1 case	Lost (1)
Husain Safdar AbidallyRespondent Lost (1)	Respondent	1 case	Lost (1)