Gurdip & Gill

Gurdip & Gill is a law firm operating in Singapore. With documented cases from 2006 to 2018. The firm has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Supported by a team of 4 counsels. The firm demonstrates particular expertise in divorce and family law. Their track record shows a 16.7% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Gurdip & Gill has demonstrated expertise across 6 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and divorce.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	2 cases	28.6% of total caseload	Experienced65.00% relevance score	Gurdip & Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 28.6% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	14.3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90.00% relevance score	Gurdip & Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 14.3% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	14.3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95.00% relevance score	Gurdip & Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 14.3% of their total caseload.
Security for Costs	1 cases	14.3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90.00% relevance score	Gurdip & Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 14.3% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	14.3% of total caseload	General Practice40.00% relevance score	Gurdip & Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 14.3% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	14.3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75.00% relevance score	Gurdip & Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 14.3% of their total caseload.

Legal Team and Representation

Gurdip & Gill has 4 notable counsels who have represented clients in various cases. The most active counsel has handled 3 cases.

Counsel Name	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Gurdip Singh	3 cases	50.0% of firm's cases	2014 sghc 100(May 2014) 2007 sghc 169(Oct 2007) 2007 sghc 98(Jun 2007)
Jagjit Singh Gill s/o Harchand Singh	2 cases	33.3% of firm's cases	2018 sghcf 1(Jan 2018) 2010 sghc 355(Dec 2010)
Jagjit Singh	2 cases	33.3% of firm's cases	2014 sghc 100(May 2014) 2007 sghc 169(Oct 2007)
Jagit Singh	1 cases	16.7% of firm's cases	2006 sghc 211(Nov 2006)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Gurdip & Gill's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.1
Complex Cases: 3 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	43.3 parties avg	3.3	66.7%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	16.7%
Won	111.0 parties avg	11.0	16.7%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2006	111.0 parties avg	11.0
2007	24.7 parties avg	4.7
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Gurdip & Gill's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(66.7%)	66.7%
Partial	1(16.7%)	16.7%
Won	1(16.7%)	16.7%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	6984255.10	2328085.032 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2006	01 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	02 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2010	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	01 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Represented Parties

List of parties represented by Gurdip & Gill in various cases

Party Name	Role	Cases	Outcomes
UJGDefendant Partial (1)	Defendant	1 case	Partial (1)
Tan Kim Huat JerryAppellant Lost (1)	Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)
Greenlam Asia Pacific Pte LtdDefendant, Appellant Lost (1)	Defendant, Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)
Mary Ting Chi FongDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Kamal Bin KupliDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Goh RosalineDefendant Won (1)	Defendant	1 case	Won (1)