Haridass Ho and Partners

Haridass Ho and Partners is a law firm operating in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2006. The firm has handled 15 cases in Singapore's courts. Supported by a team of 10 counsels. The firm demonstrates particular expertise in admiralty and maritime law and civil practice. Their track record shows a 35.3% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 8 complex cases, representing 53.3% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Haridass Ho and Partners has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and admiralty and maritime law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Contract	6 cases	15.0% of total caseload	Experienced64.64% relevance score	Haridass Ho and Partners has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 15.0% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	5 cases	12.5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82.78% relevance score	Haridass Ho and Partners has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 12.5% of their total caseload.
Torts	3 cases	7.5% of total caseload	Experienced66.67% relevance score	Haridass Ho and Partners has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7.5% of their total caseload.
Negligence	3 cases	7.5% of total caseload	Experienced73.33% relevance score	Haridass Ho and Partners has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7.5% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	5.0% of total caseload	General Practice42.50% relevance score	Haridass Ho and Partners has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5.0% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	2 cases	5.0% of total caseload	General Practice35.00% relevance score	Haridass Ho and Partners has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5.0% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	5.0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75.00% relevance score	Haridass Ho and Partners has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5.0% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	2.5% of total caseload	General Practice40.00% relevance score	Haridass Ho and Partners has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2.5% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	2.5% of total caseload	Experienced60.00% relevance score	Haridass Ho and Partners has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2.5% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	2.5% of total caseload	General Practice20.00% relevance score	Haridass Ho and Partners has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2.5% of their total caseload.

Legal Team and Representation

Haridass Ho and Partners has 10 notable counsels who have represented clients in various cases. The most active counsel has handled 5 cases.

Counsel Name	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Thomas Tan	5 cases	33.3% of firm's cases	2005 sghc 184(Sep 2005) 2005 sghc 130(Jul 2005) 2004 sgca 42(Sep 2004)
Daryll Ng	5 cases	33.3% of firm's cases	2006 sghc 12(Jan 2006) 2005 sgca 27(May 2005) 2004 sghc 215(Sep 2004)
Nicole Tan	4 cases	26.7% of firm's cases	2006 sghc 20(Feb 2006)
Randhir Ram Chandra	3 cases	20.0% of firm's cases	2006 sghc 20(Feb 2006)
Augustine Liew	2 cases	13.3% of firm's cases	2005 sghc 238(Dec 2005) 2004 sghc 198(Sep 2004)
Desmond Lee	1 cases	6.7% of firm's cases	2004 sghc 163(Aug 2004)
Haridass Ajaib	1 cases	6.7% of firm's cases	2005 sghc 238(Dec 2005)
Subashini Narayanasamy	1 cases	6.7% of firm's cases	2005 sghc 238(Dec 2005)
R Srivathsan	1 cases	6.7% of firm's cases	2002 sghc 263(Nov 2002)
Daryll Richard Ng	1 cases	6.7% of firm's cases	2004 sgca 42(Sep 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Haridass Ho and Partners's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.4
Complex Cases: 8 (53.3%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	74.6 parties avg	4.6	41.2%
Won	63.0 parties avg	3.0	35.3%
Partial	35.6 parties avg	5.6	17.6%
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	5.9%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	63.3 parties avg	3.3
2005	54.7 parties avg	4.7
2006	25.6 parties avg	5.6

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Haridass Ho and Partners's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	7(41.2%)	41.2%
Won	6(35.3%)	35.3%
Partial	3(17.6%)	17.6%
Neutral	1(5.9%)	5.9%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	2000	200.006 cases	6
USD	4000000	1000000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	01 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	01 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	0213 213	Lost: 2 cases (0.9%) Partial: 1 cases (0.5%) Won: 3 cases (1.4%)
2005	0312 312	Lost: 3 cases (1.0%) Partial: 1 cases (0.3%) Won: 2 cases (0.6%)
2006	021 21	Lost: 2 cases (9.5%) Partial: 1 cases (4.8%)

Represented Parties

List of parties represented by Haridass Ho and Partners in various cases

Party Name	Role	Cases	Outcomes
Tan Te Teck GregoryRespondent, Defendant Won (3)	Respondent, Defendant	3 cases	Won (3)
Jet Drilling (S) Pte LtdPlaintiff Lost (2)	Plaintiff	2 cases	Lost (2)
Jet Holding LtdPlaintiff Partial (2)	Plaintiff	2 cases	Partial (2)
Jet Shipping LtdPlaintiff Partial (2)	Plaintiff	2 cases	Partial (2)
Maurel Et PromPlaintiff Lost (2)	Plaintiff	2 cases	Lost (2)
Wellston Financial LtdDefendant, Applicant Lost (1)	Defendant, Applicant	1 case	Lost (1)
Marina Offshore Pte LtdPlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
Asta Rickmers Schiffahrtsgesellschaft mbH & Cie KGPlaintiff Won (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Won (1)
Tan Chin Yeow AlvinDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Cipta Sarana Marine Pte LtdRespondent Won (1)	Respondent	1 case	Won (1)
Acrux Shipping LtdDefendant, Appellant Lost (1)	Defendant, Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)
Hydromaster Pte LtdDefendant Partial (1)	Defendant	1 case	Partial (1)
Pipe Care Pte Ltd formerly known as Veltrup Asia Pacific Pte LtdDefendant Partial (1)	Defendant	1 case	Partial (1)
Intercontinental Specialty Fats BerhadPlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
PristinePlaintiff Won (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Won (1)
Swiss Singapore Overseas Enterprise Pte LtdPlaintiff Neutral (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Neutral (1)