Hilborne & Co
Hilborne & Co is a law firm operating in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2015. The firm has handled 17 cases in Singapore's courts. Supported by a team of 8 counsels. The firm demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and child abuse and neglect. Their track record shows a 17.6% success rate in resolved cases.
Areas of Practice and Expertise
Hilborne & Co has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and theft.
Practice Area | Case Volume |
---|---|
Criminal Law | 10 cases |
Theft | 3 cases |
Criminal Revision | 2 cases |
Property Law | 2 cases |
Breach of Contract | 2 cases |
Family Law | 2 cases |
Child Support | 1 cases |
Child Custody | 1 cases |
Banking Law | 1 cases |
Child Abuse and Neglect | 1 cases |
Legal Team and Representation
Hilborne & Co has 8 notable counsels who have represented clients in various cases. The most active counsel has handled 8 cases.
Counsel Name | Cases Handled |
---|---|
Rajan Supramaniam | 8 cases |
R Narayanan | 3 cases |
Alvin Chia | 2 cases |
Steven Lee | 2 cases |
Zaminder Singh Gill | 2 cases |
Steven Lee Chung Yen | 1 cases |
Zaminder Gill | 1 cases |
Dorothy Chai | 1 cases |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Hilborne & Co's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 2.4
- Complex Cases
- 0 (0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 102.3 parties avg |
Won | 32.3 parties avg |
Neutral | 23.0 parties avg |
Partial | 22.7 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2002 | 13.0 parties avg |
2003 | 32.4 parties avg |
2007 | 12.0 parties avg |
2009 | 22.3 parties avg |
2010 | 52.5 parties avg |
2011 | 32.7 parties avg |
2013 | 12.0 parties avg |
2015 | 12.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Hilborne & Co's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 10(58.8%) |
Won | 3(17.6%) |
Neutral | 2(11.8%) |
Partial | 2(11.8%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 0.005 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2002 | 01 1 |
2003 | 012 12 |
2007 | 01 1 |
2009 | 011 11 |
2010 | 041 41 |
2011 | 021 21 |
2013 | 01 1 |
2015 | 01 1 |
Represented Parties
List of parties represented by Hilborne & Co in various cases
Party Name | Cases |
---|---|
Muhammad bin KadarAppellant, Respondent, Defendant Neutral (2) | 2 cases |
AFRRespondent, Defendant Lost (2) | 2 cases |
Iskandar bin RahmatDefendant Lost (1) | 1 case |
Ravindran AnnamalaiDefendant Lost (1) | 1 case |
Kho JabingAppellant Lost (1) | 1 case |
Xuyi Building Engineering CoAppellant, Respondent Partial (1) | 1 case |
Jabing KhoDefendant Lost (1) | 1 case |
Mohamad Fadzly bin DinDefendant Lost (1) | 1 case |
Kamrul Hasan Abdul QuddusDefendant Lost (1) | 1 case |
Mohamed Ali s/o Abdul RazakPlaintiff Won (1) | 1 case |
Lim Siu LayRespondent, Plaintiff Lost (1) | 1 case |
Endang Utari MokodompitDefendant, Respondent Won (1) | 1 case |
Montien International LimitedDefendant, Respondent Won (1) | 1 case |
Muthusamy Suppiah DavidDefendant Won (1) | 1 case |
Ng Meng HinRespondent, Appellant Partial (1) | 1 case |
Ha Siew SenDefendant Lost (1) | 1 case |
Case History
Displaying all 17 cases
Case |
---|
03 Dec 2015 Iskandar bin RahmatLost |
08 Apr 2013 Ravindran AnnamalaiLost |
25 Aug 2011 Muhammad bin KadarNeutral |
26 May 2011 AFRLost |
23 May 2011 Kho JabingLost |
16 Aug 2010 Xuyi Building Engineering CoPartial |
10 Aug 2010 AFRLost |
29 Jul 2010 Jabing KhoLost |
19 Apr 2010 Mohamad Fadzly bin DinLost |
07 Jan 2010 Kamrul Hasan Abdul QuddusLost |
08 Dec 2009 Mohamed Ali s/o Abdul RazakWon |
06 Apr 2009 Muhammad bin KadarNeutral |
29 Jan 2007 Lim Siu LayLost |
10 Jul 2003 Endang Utari MokodompitWon Montien International LimitedWon |
31 Mar 2003 Muthusamy Suppiah DavidWon |
17 Feb 2003 Ng Meng HinPartial |
10 Nov 2002 Ha Siew SenLost |