Joseph Tan Jude Benny Anne Choo

Joseph Tan Jude Benny Anne Choo is a law firm operating in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2001. The firm has handled 9 cases in Singapore's courts. Supported by a team of 10 counsels. The firm demonstrates particular expertise in negligence and admiralty and maritime law. Their track record shows a 55.6% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 22.2% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Joseph Tan Jude Benny Anne Choo has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in negligence and admiralty and maritime law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Negligence	4 cases	12.9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80.63% relevance score	Joseph Tan Jude Benny Anne Choo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 12.9% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	4 cases	12.9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85.00% relevance score	Joseph Tan Jude Benny Anne Choo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 12.9% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	9.7% of total caseload	General Practice35.45% relevance score	Joseph Tan Jude Benny Anne Choo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9.7% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	6.5% of total caseload	General Practice47.50% relevance score	Joseph Tan Jude Benny Anne Choo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6.5% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	6.5% of total caseload	General Practice20.00% relevance score	Joseph Tan Jude Benny Anne Choo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6.5% of their total caseload.
Insurance	2 cases	6.5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83.33% relevance score	Joseph Tan Jude Benny Anne Choo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6.5% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	6.5% of total caseload	Experienced70.00% relevance score	Joseph Tan Jude Benny Anne Choo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6.5% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	6.5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized86.67% relevance score	Joseph Tan Jude Benny Anne Choo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6.5% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	3.2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75.00% relevance score	Joseph Tan Jude Benny Anne Choo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3.2% of their total caseload.
Trade Finance	1 cases	3.2% of total caseload	General Practice15.00% relevance score	Joseph Tan Jude Benny Anne Choo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3.2% of their total caseload.

Legal Team and Representation

Joseph Tan Jude Benny Anne Choo has 10 notable counsels who have represented clients in various cases. The most active counsel has handled 2 cases.

Counsel Name	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Danny Chua	2 cases	22.2% of firm's cases	2001 sgca 30(Apr 2001) 2001 sgca 31(Apr 2001)
Mohd Goush Marikan	2 cases	22.2% of firm's cases	2001 sgca 30(Apr 2001) 2001 sgca 31(Apr 2001)
Tan Hui Hsing	2 cases	22.2% of firm's cases	2001 sgca 30(Apr 2001) 2001 sgca 31(Apr 2001)
Navinder Singh	2 cases	22.2% of firm's cases	2001 sghc 124(Jun 2001) 2001 sghc 93(May 2001)
Derek Tan	1 cases	11.1% of firm's cases	2001 sghc 378(Dec 2001)
Jeya Putra	1 cases	11.1% of firm's cases	2001 sghc 147(Jun 2001)
Wendy Leong	1 cases	11.1% of firm's cases	2001 sghc 147(Jun 2001)
Tan Hong Seng	1 cases	11.1% of firm's cases	2001 sghc 249(Aug 2001)
Aileen Boey	1 cases	11.1% of firm's cases	2001 sgca 27(Apr 2001)
Katherine Teo	1 cases	11.1% of firm's cases	2001 sghc 93(May 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Joseph Tan Jude Benny Anne Choo's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.7
Complex Cases: 2 (22.2%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	52.7 parties avg	2.7	55.6%
Lost	32.8 parties avg	2.8	33.3%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	11.1%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2001	82.8 parties avg	2.8

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Joseph Tan Jude Benny Anne Choo's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	5(55.6%)	55.6%
Lost	3(33.3%)	33.3%
Partial	1(11.1%)	11.1%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	160000	14545.453 cases	3
USD	0	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2001	0215 215	Lost: 2 cases (0.9%) Partial: 1 cases (0.5%) Won: 5 cases (2.3%)

Represented Parties

List of parties represented by Joseph Tan Jude Benny Anne Choo in various cases

Party Name	Role	Cases	Outcomes
COSCO Container LinesDefendant Won (1)	Defendant	1 case	Won (1)
Wei Sin Construction Pte LtdDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Turegum Insurance CoDefendant Won (1)	Defendant	1 case	Won (1)
Defendant owners of the vessel Arktis FighterDefendant Partial (1)	Defendant	1 case	Partial (1)
Sherridon Exim Pte LtdPlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
Ah Lam IIRespondent Won (1)	Respondent	1 case	Won (1)
'Pu 1804'Respondent Won (1)	Respondent	1 case	Won (1)
The 'Ah Lam II'Respondent Won (1)	Respondent	1 case	Won (1)
Tan Kok Lam (next friend to Teng Eng)Appellant Won (1)	Appellant	1 case	Won (1)
Owners of the cablesRespondent Lost (1)	Respondent	1 case	Lost (1)