K K Cheng Law LLC

K K Cheng Law LLC is a law firm operating in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2022. The firm has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Supported by a team of 2 counsels. The firm demonstrates particular expertise in drug crimes. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

K K Cheng Law LLC has demonstrated expertise across 8 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and constitutional law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	5 cases	26.3% of total caseload	General Practice24.01% relevance score	K K Cheng Law LLC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 26.3% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	4 cases	21.1% of total caseload	Experienced57.93% relevance score	K K Cheng Law LLC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 21.1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	3 cases	15.8% of total caseload	General Practice25.80% relevance score	K K Cheng Law LLC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 15.8% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	3 cases	15.8% of total caseload	Experienced68.70% relevance score	K K Cheng Law LLC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 15.8% of their total caseload.
Civil Rights	1 cases	5.3% of total caseload	Experienced50.00% relevance score	K K Cheng Law LLC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5.3% of their total caseload.
Drug Crimes	1 cases	5.3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90.00% relevance score	K K Cheng Law LLC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5.3% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	5.3% of total caseload	Experienced60.00% relevance score	K K Cheng Law LLC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5.3% of their total caseload.
Pleadings	1 cases	5.3% of total caseload	General Practice40.00% relevance score	K K Cheng Law LLC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5.3% of their total caseload.

Legal Team and Representation

K K Cheng Law LLC has 2 notable counsels who have represented clients in various cases. The most active counsel has handled 6 cases.

Counsel Name	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Ravi s/o Madasamy	6 cases	100.0% of firm's cases	2022 sghc 140(Jun 2022)
Cheng Kim Kuan	2 cases	33.3% of firm's cases	2022 sghc 140(Jun 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of K K Cheng Law LLC's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 17.6
Complex Cases: 3 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	517.8 parties avg	17.8	83.3%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	16.7%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	516.0 parties avg	16.0
2022	120.0 parties avg	20.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of K K Cheng Law LLC's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(83.3%)	83.3%
Partial	1(16.7%)	16.7%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	680000	14468.092 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	041 41	Lost: 4 cases (9.8%) Partial: 1 cases (2.4%)
2022	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Represented Parties

List of parties represented by K K Cheng Law LLC in various cases

Party Name	Role	Cases	Outcomes
Hamzah bin IbrahimPlaintiff Lost (3)	Plaintiff	3 cases	Lost (3)
Ramdhan bin LajisPlaintiff Lost (3)	Plaintiff	3 cases	Lost (3)
Roslan bin BakarPlaintiff Lost (3)	Plaintiff	3 cases	Lost (3)
Rosman bin AbdullahPlaintiff Lost (3)	Plaintiff	3 cases	Lost (3)
Syed Suhail bin Syed ZinPlaintiff Lost (3)	Plaintiff	3 cases	Lost (3)
Zamri bin Mohd TahirPlaintiff Lost (3)	Plaintiff	3 cases	Lost (3)
Abdul Rahim Bin ShapieePlaintiff Lost (2)	Plaintiff	2 cases	Lost (2)
Fazali Bin MohamedPlaintiff Lost (2)	Plaintiff	2 cases	Lost (2)
Jumaat bin Mohamed SayedPlaintiff Lost (2)	Plaintiff	2 cases	Lost (2)
Masoud Rahimi bin MerzadPlaintiff Lost (2)	Plaintiff	2 cases	Lost (2)
Moad Fadzir bin MustaffaPlaintiff Lost (2)	Plaintiff	2 cases	Lost (2)
Mohammad Reduan bin MustaffarPlaintiff Lost (2)	Plaintiff	2 cases	Lost (2)
Muhammad Faizal Bin Mohd ShariffPlaintiff Lost (2)	Plaintiff	2 cases	Lost (2)
Muhammad Salleh bin HamidPlaintiff Lost (2)	Plaintiff	2 cases	Lost (2)
Nazeri bin LajimPlaintiff Lost (2)	Plaintiff	2 cases	Lost (2)
Norasharee Bin GousPlaintiff Lost (2)	Plaintiff	2 cases	Lost (2)
Rahmat Bin KarimonPlaintiff Lost (2)	Plaintiff	2 cases	Lost (2)
Iskandar bin RahmatPlaintiff, Appellant, Applicant Lost (2)	Plaintiff, Appellant, Applicant	2 cases	Lost (2)
Datchinamurthy a/l KataiahPlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
Gobi a/l AvedianPlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
Masoud Rahimi bin MehrzadPlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
Pannir Selvam PranthamanPlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
Saminathan SelvarajuPlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
Tan Kay YongPlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
Kanesan s/o RamasamyAppellant Lost (1)	Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)
Koh Rong GuiAppellant Partial (1)	Appellant	1 case	Partial (1)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

Case

2022-sghc-140

22 Jun 2022

Abdul Rahim Bin ShapieeLost

Fazali Bin MohamedLost

Hamzah bin IbrahimLost

Jumaat bin Mohamed SayedLost

Masoud Rahimi bin MerzadLost

Moad Fadzir bin MustaffaLost

Mohammad Reduan bin MustaffarLost

Muhammad Faizal Bin Mohd ShariffLost

Muhammad Salleh bin HamidLost

Nazeri bin LajimLost

Norasharee Bin GousLost

Rahmat Bin KarimonLost

Ramdhan bin LajisLost

Roslan bin BakarLost

Rosman bin AbdullahLost

Syed Suhail bin Syed ZinLost

Zamri bin Mohd TahirLost

Lost	Abdul Rahim Bin Shapiee (Plaintiff): Costs to be borne by counselCosts of the three applications, fixed at $20,000, are to be borne personally by Mr Cheng and Mr Ravi jointly and severally. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
Lost	Fazali Bin Mohamed (Plaintiff): Costs to be borne by counselCosts of the three applications, fixed at $20,000, are to be borne personally by Mr Cheng and Mr Ravi jointly and severally. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
Lost	Hamzah bin Ibrahim (Plaintiff): Costs to be borne by counselCosts of the three applications, fixed at $20,000, are to be borne personally by Mr Cheng and Mr Ravi jointly and severally. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
Lost	Jumaat bin Mohamed Sayed (Plaintiff): Costs to be borne by counselCosts of the three applications, fixed at $20,000, are to be borne personally by Mr Cheng and Mr Ravi jointly and severally. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
Lost	Masoud Rahimi bin Merzad (Plaintiff): Costs to be borne by counselCosts of the three applications, fixed at $20,000, are to be borne personally by Mr Cheng and Mr Ravi jointly and severally. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
Lost	Moad Fadzir bin Mustaffa (Plaintiff): Costs to be borne by counselCosts of the three applications, fixed at $20,000, are to be borne personally by Mr Cheng and Mr Ravi jointly and severally. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
Lost	Mohammad Reduan bin Mustaffar (Plaintiff): Costs to be borne by counselCosts of the three applications, fixed at $20,000, are to be borne personally by Mr Cheng and Mr Ravi jointly and severally. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
Lost	Muhammad Faizal Bin Mohd Shariff (Plaintiff): Costs to be borne by counselCosts of the three applications, fixed at $20,000, are to be borne personally by Mr Cheng and Mr Ravi jointly and severally. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
Lost	Muhammad Salleh bin Hamid (Plaintiff): Costs to be borne by counselCosts of the three applications, fixed at $20,000, are to be borne personally by Mr Cheng and Mr Ravi jointly and severally. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
Lost	Nazeri bin Lajim (Plaintiff): Costs to be borne by counselCosts of the three applications, fixed at $20,000, are to be borne personally by Mr Cheng and Mr Ravi jointly and severally. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
Lost	Norasharee Bin Gous (Plaintiff): Costs to be borne by counselCosts of the three applications, fixed at $20,000, are to be borne personally by Mr Cheng and Mr Ravi jointly and severally. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
Lost	Rahmat Bin Karimon (Plaintiff): Costs to be borne by counselCosts of the three applications, fixed at $20,000, are to be borne personally by Mr Cheng and Mr Ravi jointly and severally. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
Lost	Ramdhan bin Lajis (Plaintiff): Costs to be borne by counselCosts of the three applications, fixed at $20,000, are to be borne personally by Mr Cheng and Mr Ravi jointly and severally. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
Lost	Roslan bin Bakar (Plaintiff): Costs to be borne by counselCosts of the three applications, fixed at $20,000, are to be borne personally by Mr Cheng and Mr Ravi jointly and severally. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
Lost	Rosman bin Abdullah (Plaintiff): Costs to be borne by counselCosts of the three applications, fixed at $20,000, are to be borne personally by Mr Cheng and Mr Ravi jointly and severally. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
Lost	Syed Suhail bin Syed Zin (Plaintiff): Costs to be borne by counselCosts of the three applications, fixed at $20,000, are to be borne personally by Mr Cheng and Mr Ravi jointly and severally. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
Lost	Zamri bin Mohd Tahir (Plaintiff): Costs to be borne by counselCosts of the three applications, fixed at $20,000, are to be borne personally by Mr Cheng and Mr Ravi jointly and severally. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.

2021-sghc-274

01 Dec 2021

Abdul Rahim Bin ShapieeLost

Fazali Bin MohamedLost

Hamzah bin IbrahimLost

Jumaat bin Mohamed SayedLost

Masoud Rahimi bin MerzadLost

Moad Fadzir bin MustaffaLost

Mohammad Reduan bin MustaffarLost

Muhammad Faizal Bin Mohd ShariffLost

Muhammad Salleh bin HamidLost

Nazeri bin LajimLost

Norasharee Bin GousLost

Rahmat Bin KarimonLost

Ramdhan bin LajisLost

Roslan bin BakarLost

Rosman bin AbdullahLost

Syed Suhail bin Syed ZinLost

Zamri bin Mohd TahirLost

2021-sghc-270

29 Nov 2021

Datchinamurthy a/l KataiahLost

Gobi a/l AvedianLost

Hamzah bin IbrahimLost

Iskandar bin RahmatLost

Masoud Rahimi bin MehrzadLost

Pannir Selvam PranthamanLost

Ramdhan bin LajisLost

Roslan bin BakarLost

Rosman bin AbdullahLost

Saminathan SelvarajuLost

Syed Suhail bin Syed ZinLost

Tan Kay YongLost

Zamri bin Mohd TahirLost

2021-sghc-269

28 Nov 2021

Kanesan s/o RamasamyLost

2021-sgca-107

18 Nov 2021

Iskandar bin RahmatLost

2021-sghc-259

17 Nov 2021

Koh Rong GuiPartial