KK Cheng Law LLC

KK Cheng Law LLC is a law firm operating in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2022. The firm has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Supported by a team of 2 counsels. The firm demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and criminal law. They have managed 1 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

KK Cheng Law LLC has demonstrated expertise across 6 primary practice areas, with significant experience in administrative law and appellate practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Administrative Law	1 cases	16.7% of total caseload	General Practice15.00% relevance score	KK Cheng Law LLC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 16.7% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	16.7% of total caseload	Experienced60.00% relevance score	KK Cheng Law LLC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 16.7% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	16.7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75.00% relevance score	KK Cheng Law LLC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 16.7% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	16.7% of total caseload	Experienced50.00% relevance score	KK Cheng Law LLC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 16.7% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	16.7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90.00% relevance score	KK Cheng Law LLC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 16.7% of their total caseload.
Obstruction of Justice	1 cases	16.7% of total caseload	General Practice25.00% relevance score	KK Cheng Law LLC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 16.7% of their total caseload.

Legal Team and Representation

KK Cheng Law LLC has 2 notable counsels who have represented clients in various cases. The most active counsel has handled 2 cases.

Counsel Name	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Ravi s/o Madasamy	2 cases	100.0% of firm's cases	2022 sghc 184(May 2022)
Cheng Kim Kuan	1 cases	50.0% of firm's cases	2022 sghc 184(May 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of KK Cheng Law LLC's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 17.5
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	217.5 parties avg	17.5	100.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	118.0 parties avg	18.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of KK Cheng Law LLC's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(100.0%)	100.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	340000	10000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Represented Parties

List of parties represented by KK Cheng Law LLC in various cases

Party Name	Role	Cases	Outcomes
Abdul Rahim Bin ShapieePlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
Fazali Bin MohamedPlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
Hamzah bin IbrahimPlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
Jumaat bin Mohamed SayedPlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
Masoud Rahimi bin MerzadPlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
Moad Fadzir bin MustaffaPlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
Mohammad Reduan bin MustaffarPlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
Muhammad Faizal Bin Mohd ShariffPlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
Muhammad Salleh bin HamidPlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
Nazeri bin LajimPlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
Norasharee Bin GousPlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
Rahmat Bin KarimonPlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
Ramdhan bin LajisPlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
Roslan bin BakarPlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
Rosman bin AbdullahPlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
Syed Suhail bin Syed ZinPlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
Zamri bin Mohd TahirPlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
Iskandar bin RahmatApplicant Lost (1)	Applicant	1 case	Lost (1)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

Case

2022-sghc-184

11 May 2022

Abdul Rahim Bin ShapieeLost

Fazali Bin MohamedLost

Hamzah bin IbrahimLost

Jumaat bin Mohamed SayedLost

Masoud Rahimi bin MerzadLost

Moad Fadzir bin MustaffaLost

Mohammad Reduan bin MustaffarLost

Muhammad Faizal Bin Mohd ShariffLost

Muhammad Salleh bin HamidLost

Nazeri bin LajimLost

Norasharee Bin GousLost

Rahmat Bin KarimonLost

Ramdhan bin LajisLost

Roslan bin BakarLost

Rosman bin AbdullahLost

Syed Suhail bin Syed ZinLost

Zamri bin Mohd TahirLost

Lost	Abdul Rahim Bin Shapiee (Plaintiff): Costs ordered against plaintiffs' counselsCosts of OS 1025 and SUM 4742 fixed at $10,000 and reasonable disbursements, to be paid to the Attorney-General (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
Lost	Fazali Bin Mohamed (Plaintiff): Costs ordered against plaintiffs' counselsCosts of OS 1025 and SUM 4742 fixed at $10,000 and reasonable disbursements, to be paid to the Attorney-General (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
Lost	Hamzah bin Ibrahim (Plaintiff): Costs ordered against plaintiffs' counselsCosts of OS 1025 and SUM 4742 fixed at $10,000 and reasonable disbursements, to be paid to the Attorney-General (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
Lost	Jumaat bin Mohamed Sayed (Plaintiff): Costs ordered against plaintiffs' counselsCosts of OS 1025 and SUM 4742 fixed at $10,000 and reasonable disbursements, to be paid to the Attorney-General (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
Lost	Masoud Rahimi bin Merzad (Plaintiff): Costs ordered against plaintiffs' counselsCosts of OS 1025 and SUM 4742 fixed at $10,000 and reasonable disbursements, to be paid to the Attorney-General (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
Lost	Moad Fadzir bin Mustaffa (Plaintiff): Costs ordered against plaintiffs' counselsCosts of OS 1025 and SUM 4742 fixed at $10,000 and reasonable disbursements, to be paid to the Attorney-General (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
Lost	Mohammad Reduan bin Mustaffar (Plaintiff): Costs ordered against plaintiffs' counselsCosts of OS 1025 and SUM 4742 fixed at $10,000 and reasonable disbursements, to be paid to the Attorney-General (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
Lost	Muhammad Faizal Bin Mohd Shariff (Plaintiff): Costs ordered against plaintiffs' counselsCosts of OS 1025 and SUM 4742 fixed at $10,000 and reasonable disbursements, to be paid to the Attorney-General (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
Lost	Muhammad Salleh bin Hamid (Plaintiff): Costs ordered against plaintiffs' counselsCosts of OS 1025 and SUM 4742 fixed at $10,000 and reasonable disbursements, to be paid to the Attorney-General (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
Lost	Nazeri bin Lajim (Plaintiff): Costs ordered against plaintiffs' counselsCosts of OS 1025 and SUM 4742 fixed at $10,000 and reasonable disbursements, to be paid to the Attorney-General (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
Lost	Norasharee Bin Gous (Plaintiff): Costs ordered against plaintiffs' counselsCosts of OS 1025 and SUM 4742 fixed at $10,000 and reasonable disbursements, to be paid to the Attorney-General (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
Lost	Rahmat Bin Karimon (Plaintiff): Costs ordered against plaintiffs' counselsCosts of OS 1025 and SUM 4742 fixed at $10,000 and reasonable disbursements, to be paid to the Attorney-General (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
Lost	Ramdhan bin Lajis (Plaintiff): Costs ordered against plaintiffs' counselsCosts of OS 1025 and SUM 4742 fixed at $10,000 and reasonable disbursements, to be paid to the Attorney-General (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
Lost	Roslan bin Bakar (Plaintiff): Costs ordered against plaintiffs' counselsCosts of OS 1025 and SUM 4742 fixed at $10,000 and reasonable disbursements, to be paid to the Attorney-General (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
Lost	Rosman bin Abdullah (Plaintiff): Costs ordered against plaintiffs' counselsCosts of OS 1025 and SUM 4742 fixed at $10,000 and reasonable disbursements, to be paid to the Attorney-General (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
Lost	Syed Suhail bin Syed Zin (Plaintiff): Costs ordered against plaintiffs' counselsCosts of OS 1025 and SUM 4742 fixed at $10,000 and reasonable disbursements, to be paid to the Attorney-General (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
Lost	Zamri bin Mohd Tahir (Plaintiff): Costs ordered against plaintiffs' counselsCosts of OS 1025 and SUM 4742 fixed at $10,000 and reasonable disbursements, to be paid to the Attorney-General (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).

2021-sgca-89

20 Sep 2021

Iskandar bin RahmatLost