L F Violet Netto

L F Violet Netto is a law firm operating in Singapore. With documented cases from 2007 to 2022. The firm has handled 30 cases in Singapore's courts. Supported by a team of 7 counsels. The firm demonstrates particular expertise in drug crimes and employment law. Their track record shows a 12.9% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 13.3% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

L F Violet Netto has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in constitutional law and criminal law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Constitutional Law	23 cases	27.7% of total caseload	Experienced67.20% relevance score	L F Violet Netto has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 23 cases which represents 27.7% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	21 cases	25.3% of total caseload	Experienced71.46% relevance score	L F Violet Netto has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 21 cases which represents 25.3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	19 cases	22.9% of total caseload	Experienced50.23% relevance score	L F Violet Netto has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 19 cases which represents 22.9% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	2 cases	2.4% of total caseload	General Practice43.33% relevance score	L F Violet Netto has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2.4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	2.4% of total caseload	General Practice16.67% relevance score	L F Violet Netto has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2.4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	2 cases	2.4% of total caseload	Experienced60.00% relevance score	L F Violet Netto has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2.4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	2.4% of total caseload	Experienced73.33% relevance score	L F Violet Netto has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2.4% of their total caseload.
Drug Crimes	2 cases	2.4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85.00% relevance score	L F Violet Netto has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2.4% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	1.2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85.00% relevance score	L F Violet Netto has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1.2% of their total caseload.
Immigration	1 cases	1.2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90.00% relevance score	L F Violet Netto has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1.2% of their total caseload.

Legal Team and Representation

L F Violet Netto has 7 notable counsels who have represented clients in various cases. The most active counsel has handled 20 cases.

Counsel Name	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
M Ravi	20 cases	66.7% of firm's cases	2015 sgca 11(Mar 2015) 2014 sghc 230(Nov 2014) 2014 sgca 53(Oct 2014)
Ravi s/o Madasamy	5 cases	16.7% of firm's cases	2015 sghc 48(Feb 2015) 2015 sghc 7(Jan 2015) 2014 sghc 253(Nov 2014)
L F Violet Netto	2 cases	6.7% of firm's cases	2022 sgca 26(Mar 2022) 2007 sghc 19(Feb 2007)
Charles Yeo Yao Hui	2 cases	6.7% of firm's cases	2022 sgca 57(Jul 2022) 2022 sgca 18(Mar 2022)
Violet Netto	1 cases	3.3% of firm's cases	2014 sghc 247(Nov 2014)
Colin Phan	1 cases	3.3% of firm's cases	2014 sghc 247(Nov 2014)
Louis Joseph	1 cases	3.3% of firm's cases	2012 sghc 210(Oct 2012)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of L F Violet Netto's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 4 (13.3%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	242.4 parties avg	2.4	77.4%
Won	42.8 parties avg	2.8	12.9%
Dismissed	23.0 parties avg	3.0	6.5%
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	3.2%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2007	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2009	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	52.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	42.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	82.2 parties avg	2.2
2015	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	34.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of L F Violet Netto's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	24(77.4%)	77.4%
Won	4(12.9%)	12.9%
Dismissed	2(6.5%)	6.5%
Neutral	1(3.2%)	3.2%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	24000.00	1846.159 cases	9

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2007	01 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	02 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2010	041 41	Lost: 4 cases (9.8%) Won: 1 cases (2.4%)
2011	02 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2012	031 31	Lost: 3 cases (9.7%) Neutral: 1 cases (3.2%)
2013	02 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2014	017 17	Dismissed: 1 cases (5.9%) Lost: 7 cases (41.2%)
2015	03 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)
2022	013 13	Dismissed: 1 cases (7.7%) Lost: 3 cases (23.1%)

Represented Parties

List of parties represented by L F Violet Netto in various cases

Party Name	Role	Cases	Outcomes
Yong Vui KongAppellant, Applicant Lost (5)Won (2)	Appellant, Applicant	7 cases	Lost (5)Won (2)
Pausi bin JefridinApplicant, Appellant, Plaintiff, Applicant Lost (2)	Applicant, Appellant, Plaintiff, Applicant	2 cases	Lost (2)
Roslan bin BakarApplicant, Appellant, Plaintiff, Applicant Lost (2)	Applicant, Appellant, Plaintiff, Applicant	2 cases	Lost (2)
Tey Tsun HangApplicant Lost (1)Dismissed (1)	Applicant	2 cases	Lost (1)Dismissed (1)
Tan Eng HongAppellant, Plaintiff Lost (2)	Appellant, Plaintiff	2 cases	Lost (2)
James Raj s/o ArokiasamyApplicant Lost (2)	Applicant	2 cases	Lost (2)
Ramalingam RavinthranApplicant, Plaintiff Lost (2)	Applicant, Plaintiff	2 cases	Lost (2)
Shadrake AlanRespondent Lost (2)	Respondent	2 cases	Lost (2)
Nagaenthran a/l K DharmalingamAppellant Lost (1)	Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)
Lawyers for LibertyApplicant Dismissed (1)	Applicant	1 case	Dismissed (1)
Madan Mohan SinghApplicant Lost (1)	Applicant	1 case	Lost (1)
Ten Leu Jiun Jeanne-MariePlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
ROY NGERNG YI LINGDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
PRABAGARAN A/L SRIVIJAYANDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Cheong Chun YinApplicant Lost (1)	Applicant	1 case	Lost (1)
Selvi d/o NarayanasamyApplicant Lost (1)	Applicant	1 case	Lost (1)
Vellama d/o Marie MuthuRespondent Neutral (1)	Respondent	1 case	Neutral (1)
Jeyaretnam Kenneth AndrewApplicant Lost (1)	Applicant	1 case	Lost (1)
AKDAppellant Won (1)	Appellant	1 case	Won (1)
Tan Khim HengDefendant Won (1)	Defendant	1 case	Won (1)
Tan Whay EngDefendant Won (1)	Defendant	1 case	Won (1)