Lim & Lim

Lim & Lim is a law firm operating in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2011. The firm has handled 22 cases in Singapore's courts. Supported by a team of 10 counsels. Their track record shows a 17.4% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 7 complex cases, representing 31.8% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lim & Lim has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in arbitration and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Arbitration	5 cases	9.8% of total caseload	General Practice36.88% relevance score	Lim & Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 9.8% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	5 cases	9.8% of total caseload	Experienced61.11% relevance score	Lim & Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 9.8% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunctions	3 cases	5.9% of total caseload	Experienced52.50% relevance score	Lim & Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5.9% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	3 cases	5.9% of total caseload	Experienced73.00% relevance score	Lim & Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5.9% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	3 cases	5.9% of total caseload	Experienced67.50% relevance score	Lim & Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5.9% of their total caseload.
Litigation	3 cases	5.9% of total caseload	General Practice34.00% relevance score	Lim & Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5.9% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	2 cases	3.9% of total caseload	General Practice40.00% relevance score	Lim & Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3.9% of their total caseload.
Asset Protection	2 cases	3.9% of total caseload	General Practice35.00% relevance score	Lim & Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3.9% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	2 cases	3.9% of total caseload	Experienced60.00% relevance score	Lim & Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3.9% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	2.0% of total caseload	General Practice20.00% relevance score	Lim & Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Team and Representation

Lim & Lim has 10 notable counsels who have represented clients in various cases. The most active counsel has handled 7 cases.

Counsel Name	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Chopra Sarbjit Singh	7 cases	31.8% of firm's cases	2011 sghc 207(Sep 2011) 2011 sgca 30(Jun 2011) 2011 sghc 22(Jan 2011)
Sarbjit Singh	5 cases	22.7% of firm's cases	2010 sghc 108(Apr 2010) 2008 sghc 48(Apr 2008) 2008 sghc 31(Feb 2008)
Sarbjit Singh Chopra	4 cases	18.2% of firm's cases	2010 sgca 35(Sep 2010) 2007 sghc 43(Mar 2007)
Suja Michelle Sasidharan	3 cases	13.6% of firm's cases	2008 sghc 38(Mar 2008) 2007 sgca 45(Sep 2007) 2006 sghc 240(Dec 2006)
Cheryl Monteiro	2 cases	9.1% of firm's cases	2010 sghc 108(Apr 2010) 2009 sghc 96(Apr 2009)
Anil Changaroth	2 cases	9.1% of firm's cases	2000 sghc 288(Nov 2000) 2000 sghc 257(Nov 2000)
Cheryl Monterio	1 cases	4.5% of firm's cases	2009 sgca 62(Dec 2009)
Anil M Changaroth	1 cases	4.5% of firm's cases	2003 sghc 20(Feb 2003)
Anil Murkoth Changaroth	1 cases	4.5% of firm's cases	2000 sghc 279(Dec 2000)
Sarbit Singh Chopra	1 cases	4.5% of firm's cases	2009 sgca 62(Dec 2009)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lim & Lim's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.5
Complex Cases: 7 (31.8%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	163.4 parties avg	3.4	69.6%
Won	43.5 parties avg	3.5	17.4%
Neutral	22.5 parties avg	2.5	8.7%
Partial	16.0 parties avg	6.0	4.3%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	62.4 parties avg	2.4
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2006	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2007	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2008	33.0 parties avg	3.0
2009	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2010	34.6 parties avg	4.6
2011	32.7 parties avg	2.7

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lim & Lim's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	16(69.6%)	69.6%
Won	4(17.4%)	17.4%
Neutral	2(8.7%)	8.7%
Partial	1(4.3%)	4.3%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
EUR	1473215.3	491071.772 cases	2
SGD	8543972.15	533998.2611 cases	11

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	0411 411	Lost: 4 cases (1.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (0.2%) Won: 1 cases (0.2%)
2002	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	011 11	Partial: 1 cases (9.1%) Won: 1 cases (9.1%)
2006	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	011 11	Lost: 1 cases (9.1%) Won: 1 cases (9.1%)
2008	03 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)
2009	02 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2010	021 21	Lost: 2 cases (9.5%) Neutral: 1 cases (4.8%)
2011	021 21	Lost: 2 cases (9.5%) Won: 1 cases (4.8%)

Represented Parties

List of parties represented by Lim & Lim in various cases

Party Name	Role	Cases	Outcomes
TWIN ENTERPRISES PTE LTDPlaintiff, Plaintiff, Respondent Lost (2)Neutral (1)	Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Respondent	3 cases	Lost (2)Neutral (1)
Ultrapolis 3000 Investments Ltd (formerly known as Ultrapolis 3000 Theme Park Investments Ltd)Respondent Lost (2)	Respondent	2 cases	Lost (2)
Chan Chin CheungAppellant, Plaintiff, Respondent Lost (2)	Appellant, Plaintiff, Respondent	2 cases	Lost (2)
Ngu Tieng UngAppellant, Defendant Lost (2)	Appellant, Defendant	2 cases	Lost (2)
Kitnasamy s/o MarudapanAppellant, Plaintiff Won (1)Lost (1)	Appellant, Plaintiff	2 cases	Won (1)Lost (1)
Notandas s/o Premchand Jamnadas Udasi @ Nari PremchandRespondent Lost (1)	Respondent	1 case	Lost (1)
AnotherDefendant Won (1)	Defendant	1 case	Won (1)
Scandinavian Boiler Service (Asia) Pte LtdRespondent Neutral (1)	Respondent	1 case	Neutral (1)
Café Aquarium Pte LtdPlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
Chiang Sing JeongPlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
Vallinayagam DheenathayalavelSecond Defendant Lost (1)	Second Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
V Jayaraman a/l V A VellasamyDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Gay Choon IngDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Dallas Entertainment Pte LtdDefendant Won (1)	Defendant	1 case	Won (1)
Sim Kay TeckDefendant Won (1)	Defendant	1 case	Won (1)
Irene NairDefendant Won (1)	Defendant	1 case	Won (1)
Nair Sudhir KrishnanDefendant Partial (1)	Defendant	1 case	Partial (1)
Niranjan Dolly KPlaintiff, Respondent Lost (1)	Plaintiff, Respondent	1 case	Lost (1)
Victory Industrial Co Pte LtdDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)