Lisa Sam & Company

Lisa Sam & Company is a law firm operating in Singapore. With documented cases from 2012 to 2024. The firm has handled 12 cases in Singapore's courts. Supported by a team of 3 counsels. The firm demonstrates particular expertise in family law and divorce. Their track record shows a 58.3% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 33.3% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lisa Sam & Company has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in family law and corporate law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Family Law	7 cases	30.4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77.14% relevance score	Lisa Sam & Company has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 30.4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	3 cases	13.0% of total caseload	General Practice22.00% relevance score	Lisa Sam & Company has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 13.0% of their total caseload.
Divorce	2 cases	8.7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80.00% relevance score	Lisa Sam & Company has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8.7% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	8.7% of total caseload	Experienced57.50% relevance score	Lisa Sam & Company has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8.7% of their total caseload.
Proprietary Estoppel	1 cases	4.3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75.00% relevance score	Lisa Sam & Company has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4.3% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	4.3% of total caseload	General Practice20.00% relevance score	Lisa Sam & Company has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4.3% of their total caseload.
Spousal Support	1 cases	4.3% of total caseload	Experienced50.00% relevance score	Lisa Sam & Company has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4.3% of their total caseload.
Trusts and Estates	1 cases	4.3% of total caseload	Experienced60.00% relevance score	Lisa Sam & Company has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4.3% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	4.3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80.00% relevance score	Lisa Sam & Company has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4.3% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	4.3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95.00% relevance score	Lisa Sam & Company has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4.3% of their total caseload.

Legal Team and Representation

Lisa Sam & Company has 3 notable counsels who have represented clients in various cases. The most active counsel has handled 9 cases.

Counsel Name	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Sam Hui Min Lisa	9 cases	75.0% of firm's cases	2024 sghcf 36(Oct 2024) 2023 sghca 32(Oct 2023) 2022 sghcf 28(Dec 2022)
Lisa Sam	2 cases	16.7% of firm's cases	2019 sghc 97(Apr 2019) 2013 sghc 216(Oct 2013)
Lisa Sam Hui Min	1 cases	8.3% of firm's cases	2012 sghc 65(Mar 2012)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lisa Sam & Company's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.7
Complex Cases: 4 (33.3%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	73.9 parties avg	3.9	58.3%
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	16.7%
Partial	22.0 parties avg	2.0	16.7%
Neutral	19.0 parties avg	9.0	8.3%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	33.5 parties avg	3.5
2020	33.5 parties avg	3.5
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	19.0 parties avg	9.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lisa Sam & Company's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	7(58.3%)	58.3%
Lost	2(16.7%)	16.7%
Partial	2(16.7%)	16.7%
Neutral	1(8.3%)	8.3%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	3118833.32	779708.334 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2012	01 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	01 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	01 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	012 12	Partial: 1 cases (8.3%) Won: 2 cases (16.7%)
2020	021 21	Lost: 2 cases (9.5%) Won: 1 cases (4.8%)
2022	01 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	01 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	01 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Represented Parties

List of parties represented by Lisa Sam & Company in various cases

Party Name	Role	Cases	Outcomes
UZMRespondent, Plaintiff, Plaintiff Lost (1)Partial (1)	Respondent, Plaintiff, Plaintiff	2 cases	Lost (1)Partial (1)
Ding Auto Pte LtdRespondent, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim Won (2)	Respondent, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim	2 cases	Won (2)
Ding Tang LingRespondent, Third Party, Third Party in Counterclaim Won (2)	Respondent, Third Party, Third Party in Counterclaim	2 cases	Won (2)
XBOPlaintiff, Defendant in counterclaim Won (1)	Plaintiff, Defendant in counterclaim	1 case	Won (1)
Koh Choon HeongRespondent Neutral (1)	Respondent	1 case	Neutral (1)
WJGPlaintiff Partial (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Partial (1)
VGYAppellant, Plaintiff Lost (1)	Appellant, Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
Wong Kit KeePlaintiff Won (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Won (1)
CWXDefendant Won (1)	Defendant	1 case	Won (1)
Sim City Technology LtdPlaintiff Won (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Won (1)
Neo Hui LingPlaintiff Won (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Won (1)