Loo and Partners

Loo and Partners is a law firm operating in Singapore. With documented cases from 2004 to 2006. The firm has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Supported by a team of 5 counsels. The firm demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract and forum non conveniens. Their track record shows a 20.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 40% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Loo and Partners has demonstrated expertise across 5 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and forum non conveniens.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Contract	3 cases	42.9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81.25% relevance score	Loo and Partners has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 42.9% of their total caseload.
Forum Non Conveniens	1 cases	14.3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85.00% relevance score	Loo and Partners has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 14.3% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	14.3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90.00% relevance score	Loo and Partners has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 14.3% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	14.3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75.00% relevance score	Loo and Partners has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 14.3% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	14.3% of total caseload	Experienced60.00% relevance score	Loo and Partners has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 14.3% of their total caseload.

Legal Team and Representation

Loo and Partners has 5 notable counsels who have represented clients in various cases. The most active counsel has handled 5 cases.

Counsel Name	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Lim Tong Chuan	5 cases	100.0% of firm's cases	2006 sghc 33(Mar 2006) 2005 sghc 56(Mar 2005) 2005 sghc 46(Mar 2005)
Loo Choon Chiaw	2 cases	40.0% of firm's cases	2004 sghc 263(Nov 2004) 2004 sgca 3(Jan 2004)
Michael Hwang	1 cases	20.0% of firm's cases	2004 sgca 3(Jan 2004)
Awyong Leong Hwee	1 cases	20.0% of firm's cases	2006 sghc 33(Mar 2006)
Goh Hui Nee	1 cases	20.0% of firm's cases	2004 sgca 3(Jan 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Loo and Partners's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.8
Complex Cases: 2 (40%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	44.0 parties avg	4.0	80.0%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	20.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2004	22.3 parties avg	2.3
2005	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2006	19.0 parties avg	9.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Loo and Partners's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(80.0%)	80.0%
Won	1(20.0%)	20.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0	0.002 cases	2
USD	0	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2004	011 11	Lost: 1 cases (9.1%) Won: 1 cases (9.1%)
2005	02 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2006	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Represented Parties

List of parties represented by Loo and Partners in various cases

Party Name	Role	Cases	Outcomes
Civil Aeronautics AdministrationThird Party, Respondent, Appellant Won (1)Lost (1)	Third Party, Respondent, Appellant	2 cases	Won (1)Lost (1)
Fornet Enterprise Co LtdPlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
Chun Cheng Fishery Enterprise Pte LtdDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Stahltec Metallhandels GmbHPlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)