Mallal and Namazie

Mallal and Namazie is a law firm operating in Singapore. With documented cases from 2003 to 2006. The firm has handled 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Supported by a team of 7 counsels. The firm demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Mallal and Namazie has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and civil practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Contract	3 cases	17.6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75.00% relevance score	Mallal and Namazie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 17.6% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	11.8% of total caseload	Experienced73.33% relevance score	Mallal and Namazie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11.8% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	2 cases	11.8% of total caseload	Experienced67.50% relevance score	Mallal and Namazie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11.8% of their total caseload.
Negligence	2 cases	11.8% of total caseload	Experienced72.50% relevance score	Mallal and Namazie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11.8% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	5.9% of total caseload	General Practice30.00% relevance score	Mallal and Namazie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5.9% of their total caseload.
Medical Malpractice	1 cases	5.9% of total caseload	General Practice30.00% relevance score	Mallal and Namazie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5.9% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	5.9% of total caseload	Experienced50.00% relevance score	Mallal and Namazie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5.9% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	5.9% of total caseload	General Practice30.00% relevance score	Mallal and Namazie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5.9% of their total caseload.
Pleadings	1 cases	5.9% of total caseload	General Practice20.00% relevance score	Mallal and Namazie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5.9% of their total caseload.
Ship Management	1 cases	5.9% of total caseload	General Practice45.00% relevance score	Mallal and Namazie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5.9% of their total caseload.

Legal Team and Representation

Mallal and Namazie has 7 notable counsels who have represented clients in various cases. The most active counsel has handled 6 cases.

Counsel Name	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tan Teng Muan	6 cases	75.0% of firm's cases	2006 sghc 20(Feb 2006) 2006 sghc 2(Jan 2006)
Wong Khai Leng	3 cases	37.5% of firm's cases	2006 sghc 20(Feb 2006) 2005 sghc 149(Aug 2005) 2005 sghc 116(Jun 2005)
Mirza Namazie	2 cases	25.0% of firm's cases	2005 sghc 116(Jun 2005) 2004 sghc 210(Sep 2004)
Chua Boon Beng	2 cases	25.0% of firm's cases	2004 sghc 228(Oct 2004) 2004 sghc 210(Sep 2004)
Loh Li Qin	1 cases	12.5% of firm's cases	2006 sghc 2(Jan 2006)
Mirza Mohamed Namazie	1 cases	12.5% of firm's cases	2004 sghc 228(Oct 2004)
Deanna Kwok	1 cases	12.5% of firm's cases	2003 sghc 165(Jul 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Mallal and Namazie's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.3
Complex Cases: 2 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.3 parties avg	2.3	37.5%
Partial	35.0 parties avg	5.0	37.5%
Won	22.8 parties avg	2.8	25.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2005	33.3 parties avg	3.3
2006	24.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Mallal and Namazie's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(37.5%)	37.5%
Partial	3(37.5%)	37.5%
Won	2(25.0%)	25.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0	0.003 cases	3
USD	2310385.01	770128.342 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2003	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	011 11	Lost: 1 cases (9.1%) Partial: 1 cases (9.1%)
2005	0111 111	Lost: 1 cases (0.9%) Partial: 1 cases (0.9%) Won: 1 cases (0.9%)
2006	011 11	Partial: 1 cases (9.1%) Won: 1 cases (9.1%)

Represented Parties

List of parties represented by Mallal and Namazie in various cases

Party Name	Role	Cases	Outcomes
Stork Technology Services Asia Pte LtdDefendant Partial (2)	Defendant	2 cases	Partial (2)
Mohammad Taha bin IbrahimDefendant Partial (1)Lost (1)	Defendant	2 cases	Partial (1)Lost (1)
Gnau Lye ChanDefendant Won (1)	Defendant	1 case	Won (1)
Teo Phui HengDefendant Won (1)	Defendant	1 case	Won (1)
IPTE Asia Pacific Pte LtdPlaintiff Won (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Won (1)
Neocorp Innovations Pte LtdDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
DPlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)