Martin & Partners

Martin & Partners is a law firm operating in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2013. The firm has handled 11 cases in Singapore's courts. Supported by a team of 10 counsels. The firm demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and enforcement of foreign judgments. Their track record shows a 27.3% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 5 complex cases, representing 45.5% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Martin & Partners has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil practice and personal injury.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Practice	4 cases	10.3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82.22% relevance score	Martin & Partners has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 10.3% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	4 cases	10.3% of total caseload	General Practice47.78% relevance score	Martin & Partners has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 10.3% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	3 cases	7.7% of total caseload	Experienced61.67% relevance score	Martin & Partners has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7.7% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	5.1% of total caseload	General Practice28.00% relevance score	Martin & Partners has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5.1% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	2 cases	5.1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87.50% relevance score	Martin & Partners has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5.1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	5.1% of total caseload	General Practice45.00% relevance score	Martin & Partners has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5.1% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	2 cases	5.1% of total caseload	Experienced67.50% relevance score	Martin & Partners has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5.1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	5.1% of total caseload	General Practice15.00% relevance score	Martin & Partners has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5.1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	2 cases	5.1% of total caseload	Experienced65.00% relevance score	Martin & Partners has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5.1% of their total caseload.
Work Injury Compensation	2 cases	5.1% of total caseload	Experienced55.00% relevance score	Martin & Partners has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5.1% of their total caseload.

Legal Team and Representation

Martin & Partners has 10 notable counsels who have represented clients in various cases. The most active counsel has handled 4 cases.

Counsel Name	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Roderick Edward Martin	4 cases	36.4% of firm's cases	2013 sghcr 27(Nov 2013) 2011 sghc 100(Apr 2011) 2011 sghc 26(Jan 2011)
Mohamed Baiross	3 cases	27.3% of firm's cases	2012 sgca 17(Mar 2012) 2011 sghc 100(Apr 2011) 2011 sghc 26(Jan 2011)
Roderick E Martin	2 cases	18.2% of firm's cases	2007 sghc 172(Nov 2007) 2003 sgca 9(Mar 2003)
Eugene Nai	2 cases	18.2% of firm's cases	2013 sghcr 27(Nov 2013) 2012 sghcr 4(May 2012)
R E Martin	2 cases	18.2% of firm's cases	2003 sghc 121(May 2003) 2003 sghc 65(Mar 2003)
Gerald Sim	2 cases	18.2% of firm's cases	2003 sghc 65(Mar 2003) 2003 sgca 9(Mar 2003)
Trinel Chakraborty	1 cases	9.1% of firm's cases	2007 sghc 172(Nov 2007)
Loh Kim Kee	1 cases	9.1% of firm's cases	2002 sghc 135(Jun 2002)
Ooi Jian Yuan	1 cases	9.1% of firm's cases	2013 sghcr 27(Nov 2013)
Martin Roderick Edward	1 cases	9.1% of firm's cases	2012 sgca 17(Mar 2012)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Martin & Partners's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.3
Complex Cases: 5 (45.5%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	63.7 parties avg	3.7	54.5%
Won	32.4 parties avg	2.4	27.3%
Partial	14.0 parties avg	4.0	9.1%
Stayed	13.0 parties avg	3.0	9.1%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2003	33.3 parties avg	3.3
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2012	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2013	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Martin & Partners's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	6(54.5%)	54.5%
Won	3(27.3%)	27.3%
Partial	1(9.1%)	9.1%
Stayed	1(9.1%)	9.1%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	755000	41944.448 cases	8

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	021 21	Lost: 2 cases (9.5%) Partial: 1 cases (4.8%)
2007	01 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	01 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	02 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2012	011 11	Lost: 1 cases (9.1%) Stayed: 1 cases (9.1%)
2013	01 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Represented Parties

List of parties represented by Martin & Partners in various cases

Party Name	Role	Cases	Outcomes
Li Siu LunPlaintiff Won (1)Stayed (1)	Plaintiff	2 cases	Won (1)Stayed (1)
Lee Tong Boon trading as Rango Machinery ServicesRespondent, Defendant Lost (2)	Respondent, Defendant	2 cases	Lost (2)
Tokuhon (Private) LimitedPlaintiff Partial (1)Lost (1)	Plaintiff	2 cases	Partial (1)Lost (1)
Ong Pang WeeAppellant, Applicant, Defendant Lost (2)	Appellant, Applicant, Defendant	2 cases	Lost (2)
Ang JeanetteAppellant Lost (1)	Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)
Yong Kim Yoong RaymondRespondent Won (1)	Respondent	1 case	Won (1)
Raymond Yong Kim YoongRespondent, Appellant Won (1)	Respondent, Appellant	1 case	Won (1)
Kang Yoke PingApplicant, Defendant Lost (1)	Applicant, Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Ong Oon TeckApplicant, Defendant Lost (1)	Applicant, Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)