Ong, Tan and Nair

Ong, Tan and Nair is a law firm operating in Singapore. With documented cases from 2005 to 2005. The firm has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Supported by a team of 2 counsels. The firm demonstrates particular expertise in chancery and equity and credit and security. They have managed 1 complex cases, representing 33.3% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ong, Tan and Nair has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in appellate litigation and banking law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Appellate Litigation	1 cases	9.1% of total caseload	General Practice30.00% relevance score	Ong, Tan and Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9.1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	9.1% of total caseload	Experienced50.00% relevance score	Ong, Tan and Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9.1% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	9.1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75.00% relevance score	Ong, Tan and Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9.1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	9.1% of total caseload	Experienced70.00% relevance score	Ong, Tan and Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9.1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	9.1% of total caseload	Experienced60.00% relevance score	Ong, Tan and Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9.1% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	9.1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75.00% relevance score	Ong, Tan and Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9.1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	9.1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90.00% relevance score	Ong, Tan and Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9.1% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	9.1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80.00% relevance score	Ong, Tan and Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9.1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	9.1% of total caseload	General Practice20.00% relevance score	Ong, Tan and Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9.1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	9.1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80.00% relevance score	Ong, Tan and Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9.1% of their total caseload.

Legal Team and Representation

Ong, Tan and Nair has 2 notable counsels who have represented clients in various cases. The most active counsel has handled 2 cases.

Counsel Name	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Sarjeet Singh	2 cases	66.7% of firm's cases	2005 sghc 73(Apr 2005) 2005 sghc 1(Jan 2005)
Prabhakaran Nair	1 cases	33.3% of firm's cases	2005 sghc 61(Mar 2005)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ong, Tan and Nair's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 1 (33.3%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	14.0 parties avg	4.0	33.3%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	33.3%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33.3%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2005	33.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ong, Tan and Nair's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33.3%)	33.3%
Neutral	1(33.3%)	33.3%
Partial	1(33.3%)	33.3%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1538858.8	512952.933 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2005	0111 111	Lost: 1 cases (0.9%) Neutral: 1 cases (0.9%) Partial: 1 cases (0.9%)

Represented Parties

List of parties represented by Ong, Tan and Nair in various cases

Party Name	Role	Cases	Outcomes
Leong Choon KumPetitioner, Appellant, Defendant, Respondent, Appellant Partial (1)Neutral (1)	Petitioner, Appellant, Defendant, Respondent, Appellant	2 cases	Partial (1)Neutral (1)
Tan Teck Khong and Another (committee of the estate of Pang Jong Wan, mentally disordered)Defendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

Case

2005-sghc-73

18 Apr 2005

Leong Choon KumPartial

2005-sghc-61

29 Mar 2005

Tan Teck Khong and Another (committee of the estate of Pang Jong Wan, mentally disordered)Lost

2005-sghc-1

03 Jan 2005

Leong Choon KumNeutral