Salem Ibrahim & Partners

Salem Ibrahim & Partners is a law firm operating in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2009. The firm has handled 9 cases in Singapore's courts. Supported by a team of 6 counsels. The firm demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract and civil practice. Their track record shows a 44.4% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 33.3% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Salem Ibrahim & Partners has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and civil practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Contract	3 cases	15.0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75.00% relevance score	Salem Ibrahim & Partners has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 15.0% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	3 cases	15.0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75.00% relevance score	Salem Ibrahim & Partners has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 15.0% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	10.0% of total caseload	Experienced67.50% relevance score	Salem Ibrahim & Partners has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10.0% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	2 cases	10.0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92.50% relevance score	Salem Ibrahim & Partners has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10.0% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	10.0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80.00% relevance score	Salem Ibrahim & Partners has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10.0% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	2 cases	10.0% of total caseload	Experienced55.00% relevance score	Salem Ibrahim & Partners has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10.0% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	5.0% of total caseload	Experienced70.00% relevance score	Salem Ibrahim & Partners has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5.0% of their total caseload.
Performance Bonds	1 cases	5.0% of total caseload	General Practice30.00% relevance score	Salem Ibrahim & Partners has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5.0% of their total caseload.
Forum Non Conveniens	1 cases	5.0% of total caseload	General Practice45.00% relevance score	Salem Ibrahim & Partners has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5.0% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Contracts	1 cases	5.0% of total caseload	Experienced70.00% relevance score	Salem Ibrahim & Partners has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Team and Representation

Salem Ibrahim & Partners has 6 notable counsels who have represented clients in various cases. The most active counsel has handled 4 cases.

Counsel Name	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Ooi Oon Tat	4 cases	44.4% of firm's cases	2009 sghc 198(Aug 2009) 2009 sghc 183(Aug 2009) 2009 sghc 13(Jan 2009)
Yap Teong Liang	2 cases	22.2% of firm's cases	2002 sghc 60(Mar 2002) 2002 sghc 62(Mar 2002)
Salem Ibrahim	1 cases	11.1% of firm's cases	2009 sghc 123(May 2009)
Masayu Norashikin Bte Mohamad Amin	1 cases	11.1% of firm's cases	2009 sghc 123(May 2009)
Leong Why Kong	1 cases	11.1% of firm's cases	2000 sghc 253(Nov 2000)
Michelle Lim	1 cases	11.1% of firm's cases	2003 sghc 155(Jul 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Salem Ibrahim & Partners's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.9
Complex Cases: 3 (33.3%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	57.0 parties avg	7.0	55.6%
Won	42.8 parties avg	2.8	44.4%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	110.0 parties avg	10.0
2009	43.4 parties avg	3.4

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Salem Ibrahim & Partners's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(55.6%)	55.6%
Won	4(44.4%)	44.4%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	368205.34	24547.028 cases	8

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	02 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2003	01 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	031 31	Lost: 3 cases (9.7%) Won: 1 cases (3.2%)

Represented Parties

List of parties represented by Salem Ibrahim & Partners in various cases

Party Name	Role	Cases	Outcomes
Absolut Events & Marketing Pte LtdDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Vijayalakshmi SivaprakasapillaiPlaintiff, Appellant Won (1)	Plaintiff, Appellant	1 case	Won (1)
XFactor Consolidated (M) Sdn BhdPlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
P. T. Tri-M.G. Intra Asia AirlinesPlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
Duncan Samuel Rothwell MerrinDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Eastwest Management Ltd (Singapore Branch)Defendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Fullcircle Pte LtdDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Impact Pacific Consultants Pte LtdDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Impact Pacific Management Pte LtdDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Mark Justin BaileDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Norhayati Bt MalekDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Victor Adam IbrahimPlaintiff, Appellant Won (1)	Plaintiff, Appellant	1 case	Won (1)
WifeDefendant, Plaintiff Won (1)	Defendant, Plaintiff	1 case	Won (1)
BRespondent Won (1)	Respondent	1 case	Won (1)
Sin Yam Huat Investment Holding Pte LtdDefendant, Respondent Lost (1)	Defendant, Respondent	1 case	Lost (1)

Case History

Displaying all 9 cases

Case

2009-sghc-198

31 Aug 2009

Absolut Events & Marketing Pte LtdLost

2009-sghc-183

12 Aug 2009

Vijayalakshmi SivaprakasapillaiWon

2009-sghc-123

19 May 2009

XFactor Consolidated (M) Sdn BhdLost

2009-sghc-13

11 Jan 2009

P. T. Tri-M.G. Intra Asia AirlinesLost

2008-sghc-180

20 Oct 2008

Duncan Samuel Rothwell MerrinLost

Eastwest Management Ltd (Singapore Branch)Lost

Fullcircle Pte LtdLost

Impact Pacific Consultants Pte LtdLost

Impact Pacific Management Pte LtdLost

Mark Justin BaileLost

Norhayati Bt MalekLost

Lost	Duncan Samuel Rothwell Merrin (Defendant): Costs to be paidCosts of the claim and counterclaim in Suit 834/2004 to be taxed and paid forthwith. Costs of the originating summons fixed at $5,000 to be paid by the first to eighth defendants (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
Lost	Eastwest Management Ltd (Singapore Branch) (Defendant): Costs to be paidCosts of the claim and counterclaim in Suit 834/2004 to be taxed and paid forthwith. Costs of the originating summons fixed at $5,000 to be paid by the first to eighth defendants (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
Lost	Fullcircle Pte Ltd (Defendant): Costs to be paidCosts of the claim and counterclaim in Suit 834/2004 to be taxed and paid forthwith. Costs of the originating summons fixed at $5,000 to be paid by the first to eighth defendants (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
Lost	Impact Pacific Consultants Pte Ltd (Defendant): Costs to be paidCosts of the claim and counterclaim in Suit 834/2004 to be taxed and paid forthwith. Costs of the originating summons fixed at $5,000 to be paid by the first to eighth defendants (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
Lost	Impact Pacific Management Pte Ltd (Defendant): Costs to be paidCosts of the claim and counterclaim in Suit 834/2004 to be taxed and paid forthwith. Costs of the originating summons fixed at $5,000 to be paid by the first to eighth defendants (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
Lost	Mark Justin Baile (Defendant): Costs to be paidCosts of the claim and counterclaim in Suit 834/2004 to be taxed and paid forthwith. Costs of the originating summons fixed at $5,000 to be paid by the first to eighth defendants (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
Lost	Norhayati Bt Malek (Defendant): Costs to be paidCosts of the claim and counterclaim in Suit 834/2004 to be taxed and paid forthwith. Costs of the originating summons fixed at $5,000 to be paid by the first to eighth defendants (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).

2003-sghc-155

17 Jul 2003

Victor Adam IbrahimWon

2002-sghc-60

27 Mar 2002

WifeWon

2002-sghc-62

27 Mar 2002

BWon

2000-sghc-253

27 Nov 2000

Sin Yam Huat Investment Holding Pte LtdLost