Sant Singh Partnership

Sant Singh Partnership is a law firm operating in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2008. The firm has handled 10 cases in Singapore's courts. Supported by a team of 8 counsels. The firm demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and criminal law. Their track record shows a 20.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex cases, representing 10% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Sant Singh Partnership has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in personal injury and automobile accidents.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Personal Injury	3 cases	11.5% of total caseload	General Practice48.00% relevance score	Sant Singh Partnership has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 11.5% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	3 cases	11.5% of total caseload	Experienced54.00% relevance score	Sant Singh Partnership has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 11.5% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	3 cases	11.5% of total caseload	General Practice41.00% relevance score	Sant Singh Partnership has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 11.5% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	3 cases	11.5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78.00% relevance score	Sant Singh Partnership has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 11.5% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	3 cases	11.5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80.00% relevance score	Sant Singh Partnership has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 11.5% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	2 cases	7.7% of total caseload	Experienced60.00% relevance score	Sant Singh Partnership has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7.7% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	7.7% of total caseload	General Practice22.50% relevance score	Sant Singh Partnership has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7.7% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Death	2 cases	7.7% of total caseload	Experienced51.67% relevance score	Sant Singh Partnership has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7.7% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	3.8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75.00% relevance score	Sant Singh Partnership has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3.8% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	3.8% of total caseload	General Practice30.00% relevance score	Sant Singh Partnership has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3.8% of their total caseload.

Legal Team and Representation

Sant Singh Partnership has 8 notable counsels who have represented clients in various cases. The most active counsel has handled 5 cases.

Counsel Name	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Siva Murugaiyan	5 cases	50.0% of firm's cases	2005 sghc 4(Jan 2005) 2004 sgca 10(Mar 2004) 2003 sghc 176(Aug 2003)
Parveen Kaur Nagpal	3 cases	30.0% of firm's cases	2004 sgca 10(Mar 2004) 2003 sghc 171(Aug 2003) 2002 sghc 281(Nov 2002)
Foo Cheow Ming	3 cases	30.0% of firm's cases	2003 sghc 116(May 2003) 2002 sghc 199(Aug 2002) 2001 sghc 212(Aug 2001)
Sant Singh	3 cases	30.0% of firm's cases	2003 sghc 116(May 2003) 2002 sghc 199(Aug 2002) 2001 sghc 212(Aug 2001)
Kenneth Tan	2 cases	20.0% of firm's cases	2006 sghc 98(Jun 2006) 2003 sghc 171(Aug 2003)
Cheah Kok Lim	1 cases	10.0% of firm's cases	2008 sgca 6(Feb 2008)
Murugaiyan Sivakumar	1 cases	10.0% of firm's cases	2006 sghc 98(Jun 2006)
Parveen Kaur	1 cases	10.0% of firm's cases	2006 sghc 98(Jun 2006)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Sant Singh Partnership's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 1 (10%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	52.4 parties avg	2.4	50.0%
Partial	22.7 parties avg	2.7	20.0%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	20.0%
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	10.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2003	32.7 parties avg	2.7
2004	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Sant Singh Partnership's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(50.0%)	50.0%
Partial	2(20.0%)	20.0%
Won	2(20.0%)	20.0%
Neutral	1(10.0%)	10.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	01 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	011 11	Lost: 1 cases (9.1%) Partial: 1 cases (9.1%)
2003	021 21	Lost: 2 cases (9.5%) Neutral: 1 cases (4.8%)
2004	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	01 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	01 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Represented Parties

List of parties represented by Sant Singh Partnership in various cases

Party Name	Role	Cases	Outcomes
Lal HiranandPlaintiff, Defendant Lost (1)Neutral (1)	Plaintiff, Defendant	2 cases	Lost (1)Neutral (1)
Lassiter Ann MastersAppellant, Plaintiff Lost (2)	Appellant, Plaintiff	2 cases	Lost (2)
Yii Chee MingRespondent Won (1)	Respondent	1 case	Won (1)
Lassiter Ann Masters (suing as the widow and dependant of Lassiter Henry Adolphus, deceased)Plaintiff, Respondent Partial (1)	Plaintiff, Respondent	1 case	Partial (1)
Shapy Khan s/o Sher KhanAppellant Lost (1)	Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)
Mah Wand HewPlaintiff Partial (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Partial (1)
Low Lin LinAppellant Lost (1)	Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)
Tubbs Julia ElizabethRespondent Won (1)	Respondent	1 case	Won (1)