T L Yap Law Chambers LLC

T L Yap Law Chambers LLC is a law firm operating in Singapore. With documented cases from 2015 to 2025. The firm has handled 18 cases in Singapore's courts. Supported by a team of 3 counsels. The firm demonstrates particular expertise in family law and divorce. Their track record shows a 38.9% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

T L Yap Law Chambers LLC has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in family law and child custody.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Family Law	17 cases	32.1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized94.48% relevance score	T L Yap Law Chambers LLC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 17 cases which represents 32.1% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	13 cases	24.5% of total caseload	Experienced71.43% relevance score	T L Yap Law Chambers LLC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 13 cases which represents 24.5% of their total caseload.
Child Support	7 cases	13.2% of total caseload	Experienced58.18% relevance score	T L Yap Law Chambers LLC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 13.2% of their total caseload.
Divorce	6 cases	11.3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81.00% relevance score	T L Yap Law Chambers LLC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 11.3% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	2 cases	3.8% of total caseload	Experienced63.33% relevance score	T L Yap Law Chambers LLC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3.8% of their total caseload.
Relocation Disputes	2 cases	3.8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90.00% relevance score	T L Yap Law Chambers LLC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3.8% of their total caseload.
Restraining Orders	1 cases	1.9% of total caseload	Experienced70.00% relevance score	T L Yap Law Chambers LLC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1.9% of their total caseload.
Adoptions	1 cases	1.9% of total caseload	General Practice10.00% relevance score	T L Yap Law Chambers LLC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1.9% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	1.9% of total caseload	Experienced60.00% relevance score	T L Yap Law Chambers LLC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1.9% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	1.9% of total caseload	General Practice30.00% relevance score	T L Yap Law Chambers LLC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1.9% of their total caseload.

Legal Team and Representation

T L Yap Law Chambers LLC has 3 notable counsels who have represented clients in various cases. The most active counsel has handled 18 cases.

Counsel Name	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Yap Teong Liang	18 cases	100.0% of firm's cases	2025 sghcf 7(Jan 2025) 2024 sghcf 16(Mar 2024) 2024 sghcf 5(Jan 2024)
Tan Hui Qing	11 cases	61.1% of firm's cases	2022 sghca 31(Aug 2022) 2022 sghcf 21(Aug 2022) 2022 sghcf 16(Jul 2022)
Huang Liang Jun Russell	1 cases	5.6% of firm's cases	2025 sghcf 7(Jan 2025)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of T L Yap Law Chambers LLC's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	72.0 parties avg	2.0	38.9%
Partial	62.0 parties avg	2.0	33.3%
Lost	52.0 parties avg	2.0	27.8%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2015	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	52.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2025	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of T L Yap Law Chambers LLC's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	7(38.9%)	38.9%
Partial	6(33.3%)	33.3%
Lost	5(27.8%)	27.8%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	30378771.14	1898673.2010 cases	10

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2015	011 11	Partial: 1 cases (9.1%) Won: 1 cases (9.1%)
2016	01 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	011 11	Lost: 1 cases (9.1%) Won: 1 cases (9.1%)
2019	01 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	01 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	011 11	Partial: 1 cases (9.1%) Won: 1 cases (9.1%)
2022	0212 212	Lost: 2 cases (0.9%) Partial: 1 cases (0.5%) Won: 2 cases (0.9%)
2023	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	011 11	Partial: 1 cases (9.1%) Won: 1 cases (9.1%)
2025	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Represented Parties

List of parties represented by T L Yap Law Chambers LLC in various cases

Party Name	Role	Cases	Outcomes
VUGAppellant Lost (1)Won (1)	Appellant	2 cases	Lost (1)Won (1)
VYQAppellant, Defendant, Defendant Partial (1)Won (1)	Appellant, Defendant, Defendant	2 cases	Partial (1)Won (1)
CLCDefendant Won (1)Partial (1)	Defendant	2 cases	Won (1)Partial (1)
XBVAppellant Lost (1)	Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)
VZKDefendant Partial (1)	Defendant	1 case	Partial (1)
WQHRespondent Won (1)	Respondent	1 case	Won (1)
UKSAppellant, Mother Lost (1)	Appellant, Mother	1 case	Lost (1)
VEVRespondent Lost (1)	Respondent	1 case	Lost (1)
BZDAppellant Partial (1)	Appellant	1 case	Partial (1)
USAPlaintiff Partial (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Partial (1)
ULAAppellant Won (1)	Appellant	1 case	Won (1)
UFZAppellant Lost (1)	Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)
TOVRespondent, Plaintiff Won (1)	Respondent, Plaintiff	1 case	Won (1)
TDXAppellant Won (1)	Appellant	1 case	Won (1)
AQBPlaintiff Partial (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Partial (1)