Tan See Swan & Co.

Tan See Swan & Co. is a law firm operating in Singapore. With documented cases from 2003 to 2023. The firm has handled 24 cases in Singapore's courts. Supported by a team of 3 counsels. The firm demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law. Their track record shows a 12.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 7 complex cases, representing 29.2% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan See Swan & Co. has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and property law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	12 cases	27.3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80.00% relevance score	Tan See Swan & Co. has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 12 cases which represents 27.3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	7 cases	15.9% of total caseload	Experienced59.09% relevance score	Tan See Swan & Co. has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 15.9% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	4.5% of total caseload	Experienced70.00% relevance score	Tan See Swan & Co. has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4.5% of their total caseload.
Litigation	2 cases	4.5% of total caseload	General Practice38.33% relevance score	Tan See Swan & Co. has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4.5% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	4.5% of total caseload	General Practice40.00% relevance score	Tan See Swan & Co. has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4.5% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	2 cases	4.5% of total caseload	Experienced50.00% relevance score	Tan See Swan & Co. has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4.5% of their total caseload.
Theft	2 cases	4.5% of total caseload	General Practice40.00% relevance score	Tan See Swan & Co. has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4.5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	2.3% of total caseload	General Practice20.00% relevance score	Tan See Swan & Co. has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2.3% of their total caseload.
Harassment	1 cases	2.3% of total caseload	Experienced70.00% relevance score	Tan See Swan & Co. has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2.3% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	2.3% of total caseload	General Practice30.00% relevance score	Tan See Swan & Co. has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2.3% of their total caseload.

Legal Team and Representation

Tan See Swan & Co. has 3 notable counsels who have represented clients in various cases. The most active counsel has handled 14 cases.

Counsel Name	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tan Hee Joek	14 cases	58.3% of firm's cases	2023 sghc 190(Jul 2023) 2021 sghci 11(Sep 2021) 2021 sgca 65(Jun 2021)
Diana Foo	8 cases	33.3% of firm's cases	2023 sgca 12(Apr 2023) 2022 sgca 68(Oct 2022) 2021 sghcr 6(Aug 2021)
Tan Hee Liang	6 cases	25.0% of firm's cases	2012 sghc 174(Aug 2012)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan See Swan & Co.'s case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.7
Complex Cases: 7 (29.2%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	173.9 parties avg	3.9	68.0%
Partial	42.8 parties avg	2.8	16.0%
Won	33.5 parties avg	3.5	12.0%
Neutral	14.0 parties avg	4.0	4.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2003	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2012	54.6 parties avg	4.6
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2019	32.7 parties avg	2.7
2020	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	42.5 parties avg	2.5
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	23.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan See Swan & Co.'s case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	17(68.0%)	68.0%
Partial	4(16.0%)	16.0%
Won	3(12.0%)	12.0%
Neutral	1(4.0%)	4.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	36500	5214.296 cases	6

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2003	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	02 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2012	0312 312	Lost: 3 cases (1.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (0.3%) Partial: 2 cases (0.6%)
2013	01 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	02 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2019	021 21	Lost: 2 cases (9.5%) Partial: 1 cases (4.8%)
2020	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	04 4	Lost: 4 cases (100.0%)
2022	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	011 11	Lost: 1 cases (9.1%) Partial: 1 cases (9.1%)

Represented Parties

List of parties represented by Tan See Swan & Co. in various cases

Party Name	Role	Cases	Outcomes
Skyventure VWT Singapore Pte LtdAppellant, Respondent, Respondent Lost (2)	Appellant, Respondent, Respondent	2 cases	Lost (2)
Liang and Sons Holdings (S) Pte LtdRespondent, Plaintiff Partial (1)Won (1)	Respondent, Plaintiff	2 cases	Partial (1)Won (1)
Loh Cheok SanRespondent Lost (1)	Respondent	1 case	Lost (1)
Abdoll Mutaleb bin RaffikAppellant Partial (1)	Appellant	1 case	Partial (1)
Muhamad Azmi bin KamilAppellant Lost (1)	Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)
Then FengDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Ng Shu Yi (alias Wu Shuyi)Plaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
Teo Seng TiongApplicant Lost (1)	Applicant	1 case	Lost (1)
GCOAppellant Partial (1)	Appellant	1 case	Partial (1)
Mohd Soberi Bin PakariDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Aishamudin bin JamaludinDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Ali bin Mohamad BahashwanAppellant Lost (1)	Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)
MOHD AZIZ BIN HUSSAINDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Muhammad Nur bin AbdullahApplicant Lost (1)	Applicant	1 case	Lost (1)
Kee Yau ChongAppellant Won (1)	Appellant	1 case	Won (1)
Public ProsecutorAppellant Lost (1)	Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)
Hu Yen-ChengPlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
Lee Chang-RungPlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
Lee Huey-JenPlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
Lee Sung-RongPlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
Giok Bie JaoRespondent Neutral (1)	Respondent	1 case	Neutral (1)
Jimmy JonathanRespondent Partial (1)	Respondent	1 case	Partial (1)
Lee Kun EnRespondent Lost (1)	Respondent	1 case	Lost (1)
Foo Jhee TuangDefendant Won (1)	Defendant	1 case	Won (1)
Lee Ngiap HanAppellant Lost (1)	Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)
Lim ChangDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Tock Siok ChengDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)