Tito Isaac & Co

Tito Isaac & Co is a law firm operating in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2007. The firm has handled 11 cases in Singapore's courts. Supported by a team of 10 counsels. The firm demonstrates particular expertise in construction law and banking law. Their track record shows a 36.4% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 27.3% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tito Isaac & Co has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and construction law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Contract	3 cases	11.1% of total caseload	Experienced74.00% relevance score	Tito Isaac & Co has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 11.1% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	2 cases	7.4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75.00% relevance score	Tito Isaac & Co has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7.4% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	7.4% of total caseload	General Practice26.00% relevance score	Tito Isaac & Co has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7.4% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	2 cases	7.4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81.00% relevance score	Tito Isaac & Co has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7.4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3.7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75.00% relevance score	Tito Isaac & Co has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3.7% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	3.7% of total caseload	Experienced65.00% relevance score	Tito Isaac & Co has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3.7% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	3.7% of total caseload	General Practice30.00% relevance score	Tito Isaac & Co has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3.7% of their total caseload.
Conveyancing	1 cases	3.7% of total caseload	General Practice30.00% relevance score	Tito Isaac & Co has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3.7% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	3.7% of total caseload	General Practice20.00% relevance score	Tito Isaac & Co has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3.7% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	3.7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75.00% relevance score	Tito Isaac & Co has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3.7% of their total caseload.

Legal Team and Representation

Tito Isaac & Co has 10 notable counsels who have represented clients in various cases. The most active counsel has handled 6 cases.

Counsel Name	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tito Shane Isaac	6 cases	54.5% of firm's cases	2007 sghc 194(Nov 2007) 2007 sgca 12(Mar 2007)
P Padman	2 cases	18.2% of firm's cases	2007 sgca 12(Mar 2007)
Justin Chan Yew Loong	2 cases	18.2% of firm's cases	2007 sghc 194(Nov 2007) 2006 sghc 92(Jun 2006)
Tito Shane Issac	2 cases	18.2% of firm's cases	2002 sghc 222(Sep 2002) 2001 sghc 2(Jan 2001)
Sadique Marican	2 cases	18.2% of firm's cases	2003 sghc 187(Aug 2003) 2003 sghc 104(May 2003)
Kenneth Tan	1 cases	9.1% of firm's cases	2002 sgca 53(Dec 2002)
David Morais	1 cases	9.1% of firm's cases	2002 sghc 54(Mar 2002)
Tito Isaac	1 cases	9.1% of firm's cases	2003 sghc 187(Aug 2003)
Mustaffa bin Abu Bakar	1 cases	9.1% of firm's cases	2001 sghc 2(Jan 2001)
Niko Arthur Isaac	1 cases	9.1% of firm's cases	2002 sgca 53(Dec 2002)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tito Isaac & Co's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.5
Complex Cases: 3 (27.3%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	52.9 parties avg	2.9	45.5%
Won	44.1 parties avg	4.1	36.4%
Dismissed	13.0 parties avg	3.0	9.1%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	9.1%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	32.5 parties avg	2.5
2003	22.7 parties avg	2.7
2006	24.2 parties avg	4.2
2007	34.1 parties avg	4.1

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tito Isaac & Co's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(45.5%)	45.5%
Won	4(36.4%)	36.4%
Dismissed	1(9.1%)	9.1%
Partial	1(9.1%)	9.1%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	304950.00	13861.367 cases	7

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	01 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	021 21	Lost: 2 cases (9.5%) Won: 1 cases (4.8%)
2003	011 11	Dismissed: 1 cases (9.1%) Lost: 1 cases (9.1%)
2006	011 11	Lost: 1 cases (9.1%) Won: 1 cases (9.1%)
2007	012 12	Lost: 1 cases (8.3%) Won: 2 cases (16.7%)

Represented Parties

List of parties represented by Tito Isaac & Co in various cases

Party Name	Role	Cases	Outcomes
Scanlon Graeme JohnRespondent, Defendant Won (2)	Respondent, Defendant	2 cases	Won (2)
Stanley Adam ZagrodnikRespondent, Defendant Won (2)	Respondent, Defendant	2 cases	Won (2)
Beam Technology (Mfg) Pte LtdAppellant, Appellant, Plaintiff Won (1)Lost (1)	Appellant, Appellant, Plaintiff	2 cases	Won (1)Lost (1)
VHPetitioner Lost (1)	Petitioner	1 case	Lost (1)
Revitech Pte LtdDefendant Won (1)	Defendant	1 case	Won (1)
Bulkpak Pte LtdRespondent Won (1)	Respondent	1 case	Won (1)
Bulpak Pte LtdDefendant Won (1)	Defendant	1 case	Won (1)
Chua Kwee Chen, Lim Kah Nee and Lim Chah In (as New Westlake Eating House)Plaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
Chua Kwee Chen, Lim Kah Nee and Lim Chah In (as Westlake Eating House)Plaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
Asia Business Forum Pte LtdPlaintiff Dismissed (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Dismissed (1)
Oh Thai NanDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Rahmatullah s/o Oli MohamedPlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
Triple Five Transportation & Engineering Construction Pte LtdDefendant Partial (1)	Defendant	1 case	Partial (1)