Troy Yeo & Co

Troy Yeo & Co is a law firm operating in Singapore. With documented cases from 2010 to 2014. The firm has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Supported by a team of 1 counsel. The firm demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract. Their track record shows a 33.3% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Troy Yeo & Co has demonstrated expertise across 4 primary practice areas, with significant experience in corporate law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Corporate Law	2 cases	40.0% of total caseload	Experienced55.00% relevance score	Troy Yeo & Co has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 40.0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	20.0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75.00% relevance score	Troy Yeo & Co has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 20.0% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	20.0% of total caseload	Experienced50.00% relevance score	Troy Yeo & Co has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 20.0% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	20.0% of total caseload	General Practice30.00% relevance score	Troy Yeo & Co has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 20.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Team and Representation

Troy Yeo & Co has 1 notable counsels who have represented clients in various cases. The most active counsel has handled 3 cases.

Counsel Name	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Troy Yeo	3 cases	100.0% of firm's cases	2014 sghc 83(Apr 2014)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Troy Yeo & Co's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.8
Complex Cases: 3 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	25.0 parties avg	5.0	33.3%
Won	24.7 parties avg	4.7	33.3%
Dismissed	14.0 parties avg	4.0	16.7%
Lost	16.0 parties avg	6.0	16.7%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2014	25.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Troy Yeo & Co's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	2(33.3%)	33.3%
Won	2(33.3%)	33.3%
Dismissed	1(16.7%)	16.7%
Lost	1(16.7%)	16.7%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	393399.7	393399.701 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	01 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	01121 1121	Dismissed: 1 cases (0.1%) Lost: 1 cases (0.1%) Partial: 2 cases (0.2%) Won: 1 cases (0.1%)

Represented Parties

List of parties represented by Troy Yeo & Co in various cases

Party Name	Role	Cases	Outcomes
Albert Hong Hin KayDefendant Dismissed (1)Lost (1)	Defendant	2 cases	Dismissed (1)Lost (1)
Edward Hong Hin KitDefendant Dismissed (1)Lost (1)	Defendant	2 cases	Dismissed (1)Lost (1)
PT Nusautama MedicalindoDefendant Dismissed (1)Won (1)	Defendant	2 cases	Dismissed (1)Won (1)
Columbia Asia Healthcare Sdn BhdPlaintiff Partial (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Partial (1)
Thermal Industries & Supplies (Pte) LtdPlaintiff Partial (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Partial (1)
Thermal International (S) Pte LtdPlaintiff Won (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Won (1)
Columbia AsiaDefendant Won (1)	Defendant	1 case	Won (1)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

Case

2014-sghc-83

21 Apr 2014

Albert Hong Hin KayDismissed

Columbia Asia Healthcare Sdn BhdPartial

Edward Hong Hin KitDismissed

PT Nusautama MedicalindoDismissed

2014-sghc-65

09 Apr 2014

Albert Hong Hin KayLost

Edward Hong Hin KitLost

Thermal Industries & Supplies (Pte) LtdPartial

Thermal International (S) Pte LtdWon

Lost	Albert Hong Hin Kay (Defendant): Partial Judgment against DefendantJudgment for damages to be assessed for the reasonable costs of taking measures to remove the MEC Charge from the land title certificate. The assessment of such costs is to be conducted by me or another judge (including a judicial commissioner) of the High Court. The Hongs are liable to indemnify Columbia for any claim by DVI in relation to the transfer of the DVI Shares, including reasonable costs of defending any claim that DVI may bring against Columbia and/or PTNM. The Hongs to indemnify Columbia for the sum of IDR 7,027,522,992 being the additional taxes that were paid to the ITA in respect of the years 2004 to 2007; and The Hongs are liable to indemnify Columbia for any future tax assessments on PTNM for the period before 22 January 2008, as well as any penalties which may be imposed and/or any reasonable costs (including legal costs) which may be incurred in dealing with any investigation and/or prosecution by the tax authorities. The Hongs to indemnify Columbia for the sum of S$262,934.48. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
Lost	Edward Hong Hin Kit (Defendant): Partial Judgment against DefendantJudgment for damages to be assessed for the reasonable costs of taking measures to remove the MEC Charge from the land title certificate. The assessment of such costs is to be conducted by me or another judge (including a judicial commissioner) of the High Court. The Hongs are liable to indemnify Columbia for any claim by DVI in relation to the transfer of the DVI Shares, including reasonable costs of defending any claim that DVI may bring against Columbia and/or PTNM. The Hongs to indemnify Columbia for the sum of IDR 7,027,522,992 being the additional taxes that were paid to the ITA in respect of the years 2004 to 2007; and The Hongs are liable to indemnify Columbia for any future tax assessments on PTNM for the period before 22 January 2008, as well as any penalties which may be imposed and/or any reasonable costs (including legal costs) which may be incurred in dealing with any investigation and/or prosecution by the tax authorities. The Hongs to indemnify Columbia for the sum of S$262,934.48. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
Partial	Thermal Industries & Supplies (Pte) Ltd (Plaintiff): Partial Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment against PTNM for S$262,934.48 and for S$10,000. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
Won	Thermal International (S) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment against PTNM for S$393,399.70. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.

2010-sghc-192

05 Jul 2010

Columbia AsiaWon

PT Nusautama MedicalindoWon