A Rajandran

A Rajandran is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 35 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 5 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in construction law and criminal procedure. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 11 complex cases, representing 31% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

A Rajandran has demonstrated expertise across 138 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	22 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 22 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	13 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice39% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 13 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Company Law	11 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 11 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	8 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	7 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	7 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized84% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	5 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Family Law	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized86% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized79% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice41% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Partnership Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Offences	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice26% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conversion	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Security of Payment	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Lifting corporate veil	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duress	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice36% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Theft	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Guidelines	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Will Interpretation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Children's Maintenance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Wills	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Property	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Attempted Rape	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets Division	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duty	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Principle of Parity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Proceedings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Measurement contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Workplace Safety and Health	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 2004	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Illegal moneylending	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Anton Piller Order	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Human Trafficking Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sexual assault	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Guarantor	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sham Transaction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Identification Evidence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Compromise Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Claims by sub-contractor	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Void marriage	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Moneylending Business	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Trustee de son tort	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Investment Management	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Guarantee	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Tax Evasion	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Constructive Dismissal	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Accounting Records	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
No Case Submission	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Opportunity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Agency and Distributorships	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Child Support	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Forum Non Conveniens	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Security for Costs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Unconscionability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Care and Control	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Access to Children	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Home	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Non est factum	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Wife)	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Child)	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Stay of Execution	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Extension of Time	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Culpable Homicide	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Moneylenders Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Stay of Proceedings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Proceedings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Statutory Demand	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Money and moneylenders	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Warranty of Authority	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Trust	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Young Offenders	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Illegality	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Termination of Leases	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Specific performance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Forum conveniens	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Show cause action	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	A Rajandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

A Rajandran has been affiliated with 5 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 20 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
A Rajandran	20 cases	57% of cases	Law Society of Singapore v Kasturibai: Disciplinary Proceedings for False Attestation in Property Sale(Feb 2024) Hsu Hsueh Hui v Foong Yook Kooi: Tenancy Termination & Tort of Conversion(May 2022) Lakshmanan Shanmuganathan v L Manimuthu: Bankruptcy Appeal on Statutory Demand Compliance(Oct 2021)
A Rajandran Joseph and Nayar	6 cases	17% of cases	Transbilt Engineering v Finebuild Systems: Garnishee Order and Winding Up in Insolvency Law(Jul 2005) Finebuild Systems v Transbilt Engineering: Garnishee Order & Winding Up in Insolvency Law(Jan 2005) Tan Eng Chye v The Director of Prisons: Judicial Review of Medical Certification for Caning(Sep 2004)
A Rajandran Joseph & Nayar	5 cases	14% of cases	G v R: Custody Dispute - Welfare of Child, Parental Mental Health, and Tender Years Doctrine(Sep 2003) Lim Eng Beng v Siow Soon Kim: Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal(Jul 2003) Lim Eng Beng v Siow Soon Kim: Partnership Dispute Over Undistributed Assets and Profits(Jul 2003)
M/S A. Rajandran	3 cases	9% of cases	WNE v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against JRC Order Allowed, Home Probation Granted Based on Parity(Jun 2023) Lim Beng Cheng v Lim Ngee Sing: Breach of Contract, Specific Performance, Moneylending Act(Oct 2015) VBH Singapore Pte Ltd v Technobuilt Construction: Striking Out Claim for Lack of Reasonable Cause of Action(May 2013)
A Rajandran Joseph & Nair	1 cases	3% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Jamal anak Nyalau: Culpable Homicide Sentencing(Apr 2002)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of A Rajandran's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.6
Complex Cases: 11 (31%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	183.6 parties avg	3.6	51%
Partial	64.0 parties avg	4.0	17%
Won	123.3 parties avg	3.3	34%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2001	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2002	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2003	45.0 parties avg	5.0
2004	35.0 parties avg	5.0
2005	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2014	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	32.5 parties avg	2.5
2016	33.3 parties avg	3.3
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	25.2 parties avg	5.2
2020	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2021	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2022	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of A Rajandran's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	18(50%)	50%
Partial	6(17%)	17%
Won	12(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,020,166.51	48,579.3621 cases	21

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2001	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	4 13	Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 3 cases (75.0%)
2004	4 22	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2005	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2007	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2015	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2016	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2022	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 35 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Law Society of Singapore v Kasturibai: Disciplinary Proceedings for False Attestation in Property Sale 27 Feb 2024 Kasturibai d/o Manickam (Respondent)Lost	27 Feb 2024	Kasturibai d/o Manickam (Respondent): Suspension for 12 monthsMs. Kasturibai was suspended for a period of 12 months and ordered to pay costs of $10,000 inclusive of disbursements to the Law Society. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore)
2	WNE v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against JRC Order Allowed, Home Probation Granted Based on Parity 04 Jun 2023 WNE (Appellant)Won	04 Jun 2023	WNE (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal against the District Judge's order was allowed, and the order was substituted with home probation for 21 months, with a 12-month voluntary stay in the Singapore Boys' Hostel.
3	Hsu Hsueh Hui v Foong Yook Kooi: Tenancy Termination & Tort of Conversion 12 May 2022 Hsu Hsueh Hui (alias Jenny Hsu) (Plaintiff)Partial	12 May 2022	Hsu Hsueh Hui (alias Jenny Hsu) (Plaintiff): Claims dismissed, except for the return of the security depositPlaintiff's claims for wrongful termination, wrongful eviction, and wrongful detention of belongings were dismissed. The court ordered the return of the security deposit of $4,600 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Lakshmanan Shanmuganathan v L Manimuthu: Bankruptcy Appeal on Statutory Demand Compliance 06 Oct 2021 Lakshmanan Shanmuganathan (also known as L Shanmuganathan) (Appellant)Lost	06 Oct 2021	Lakshmanan Shanmuganathan (also known as L Shanmuganathan) (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; appellant ordered to pay respondents costs fixed at $30,000, inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	VBS v VBR: Appeal on Variation of Child Maintenance Order 29 Sep 2021 VBR (Respondent)Won	29 Sep 2021	VBR (Respondent): Variation Order UpheldHusband's variation order regarding the children's maintenance was upheld. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Lakshmanan Shanmuganathan v L Manimuthu: Bankruptcy Appeal on Statutory Demand 30 Nov 2020 Lakshmanan Shanmuganathan (alias L Shanmuganathan) (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	30 Nov 2020	Lakshmanan Shanmuganathan (alias L Shanmuganathan) (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe plaintiff's appeal against the decision to dismiss his application to set aside the statutory demand was dismissed.
7	Liew Kum Chong v SVM International Trading: Sham Transaction, Mistake, Non Est Factum, Unconscionability, Illegal Moneylending 10 Jul 2019 Scarlett Merida Xi Wei Yuan (Defendant)Lost	10 Jul 2019	Scarlett Merida Xi Wei Yuan (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against Scarlett in the sum of $400,000. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	SCK Serijadi Sdn Bhd v Artison Interior Pte Ltd: Winding Up & Stay of Proceedings 14 Jan 2019 Artison Interior Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant)Won	14 Jan 2019	Artison Interior Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal UpheldAppeal dismissed with costs fixed at $25,000 (all-in) to the respondent. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	Mansource Interior v CSG Group: Overpayment Dispute in Construction Subcontracts 07 Mar 2017 CSG Group Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim)Lost	07 Mar 2017	CSG Group Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim): Counterclaim DismissedDefendant's counterclaim dismissed in its entirety. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	Ng Jun Xian v Public Prosecutor: Appeal on Sexual Assault by Penetration Sentence 28 Dec 2016 Ng Jun Xian (Appellant, Respondent)Lost	28 Dec 2016	Ng Jun Xian (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe offender's appeal against the sentence was dismissed.
11	Soon Ah See v Diao Yanmei: Sham Marriage & Revocation of CPF Nomination 05 Sep 2016 Soon Ah Choon (Plaintiff)Won	05 Sep 2016	Soon Ah Choon (Plaintiff): Declaration grantedDeclaration granted that the nomination made by the deceased on 5 January 2009 had not been revoked and is therefore valid.
12	L Manimuthu v L Shanmuganathan: Dispute over Family Assets, Compromise Agreement, and Illegality Defense 05 Sep 2016 L Shanmuganathan (Defendant)Partial	05 Sep 2016	L Shanmuganathan (Defendant): Counterclaim allowed in partThe Plaintiffs were to transfer to the Defendant the outstanding assets owing to the Defendant pursuant to the Compromise Agreement, as well as the entire sale proceeds of the property in Coimbatore District, Tamil Nadu. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
13	City Harvest Church v AMAC Capital Partners: Unenforceability of Loan Agreements under Moneylenders Act 16 Nov 2015 Chew Eng Han (Defendant, Appellant)Partial	16 Nov 2015	Chew Eng Han (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeals allowed in part. The order setting aside the judgment against AMAC Capital Partners and the order giving Chew Eng Han leave to defend were unconditional for the First to Third Outstanding Tranches. For the Fourth Outstanding Tranche, the orders were conditional upon AMAC Capital Partners and/or Chew Eng Han furnishing security in the sum of $1.5m.
14	Lim Beng Cheng v Lim Ngee Sing: Breach of Contract, Specific Performance, Moneylending Act 28 Oct 2015 LIM NGEE SING (Defendant)Lost	28 Oct 2015	LIM NGEE SING (Defendant): Damages to be assessedDamages to be assessed, interest from the date of judgment and/or assessment (as decided at the assessment) and costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
15	Citiwall Safety Glass v Mansource Interior: SOPA Adjudication Response Deadline Dispute 19 Aug 2015 Citiwall Safety Glass Pte Ltd (Appellant)Won	19 Aug 2015	Citiwall Safety Glass Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed. Costs of the appeal and the proceedings below fixed at $35,000 inclusive of disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
16	Citiwall Safety Glass v Mansource Interior: Security of Payment Act & Leave to Appeal 26 Nov 2014 Citiwall Safety Glass Pte Ltd (Appellant)Partial	26 Nov 2014	Citiwall Safety Glass Pte Ltd (Appellant): Additional security for costs orderedAppellant ordered to furnish additional security in the sum of $5,000 within seven days of the date of this judgment. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
17	Mansource Interior v Citiwall Safety Glass: Setting Aside Adjudication Determination Under SOP Act 24 Apr 2014 Citiwall Safety Glass Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	24 Apr 2014	Citiwall Safety Glass Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; required to pay costs of $5,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
18	Qingjian v Capstone: Setting Aside Adjudication Determination Under SOPA for Payment Claim Dispute 17 Feb 2014 Capstone Engineering Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	17 Feb 2014	Capstone Engineering Pte Ltd (Defendant): Adjudication determination upheldThe defendant's adjudication determination was upheld. The amount due pursuant to the adjudication determination in AA 126/2013 was $80,566.51. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
19	VBH Singapore Pte Ltd v Technobuilt Construction: Striking Out Claim for Lack of Reasonable Cause of Action 06 May 2013 VBH Singapore Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	06 May 2013	VBH Singapore Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim against the second defendant struck outThe plaintiff's claim against the second defendant was struck out for lack of a reasonable cause of action. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
20	Sun Jin Engineering v Hwang Jae Woo: Forum Non Conveniens & Stay of Proceedings 20 Jan 2011 Sun Jin Engineering Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	20 Jan 2011	Sun Jin Engineering Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs.
21	Sun Jin Engineering v Hwang Jae Woo: Forum Non Conveniens & Stay of Proceedings 12 Apr 2010 Sun Jin Engineering Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	12 Apr 2010	Sun Jin Engineering Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
22	Ang Sin Hock v Khoo Eng Lim: Conversion, Deceit & Limitation Act 06 Aug 2009 Ang Sin Hock (Plaintiff)Lost	06 Aug 2009	Ang Sin Hock (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim against Khoo Eng Lim was dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
23	Fibresteel Industries v Radovic Dragoslav: Security for Costs Application in Contract Dispute 19 Sep 2007 Fibresteel Industries Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	19 Sep 2007	Fibresteel Industries Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant): Security for costs orderedSecurity for costs in the amount of $30,000 be furnished by the plaintiff within 4 weeks (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
24	Transbilt Engineering v Finebuild Systems: Garnishee Order and Winding Up in Insolvency Law 10 Jul 2005 Finebuild Systems Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	10 Jul 2005	Finebuild Systems Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed.
25	Finebuild Systems v Transbilt Engineering: Garnishee Order & Winding Up in Insolvency Law 26 Jan 2005 Finebuild Systems Pte Ltd (Applicant, Plaintiff)Won	26 Jan 2005	Finebuild Systems Pte Ltd (Applicant, Plaintiff): Application AllowedFinebuild's application to proceed with its garnishee proceedings notwithstanding the liquidation of the company was allowed.
26	Tan Eng Chye v The Director of Prisons: Judicial Review of Medical Certification for Caning 05 Sep 2004 Tan Eng Chye (Applicant)Lost	05 Sep 2004	Tan Eng Chye (Applicant): Application dismissedThe application for an order of certiorari to quash the medical officer's certification was dismissed.
27	Govindaraj Perumalsamy v PP: Identification Parade Irregularities and Sentencing in Robbery with Hurt Case 03 Feb 2004 Soupramaniane D Jeamany (Appellant)Won	03 Feb 2004	Soupramaniane D Jeamany (Appellant): Appeal allowedThe appellant's appeal was allowed by the court.
28	Siow Soon Kim v Lim Eng Beng: Partnership Assets, Tax Evasion, and Illegality in Contract 29 Jan 2004 Lim Eng Beng alias Lim Jia Le (Respondent)Won	29 Jan 2004	Lim Eng Beng alias Lim Jia Le (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentHigh Court ruled in favour of the respondent, including making an order for the taking of accounts to determine his rightful share. Appeal dismissed.
29	G v R: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Maintenance Dispute in Divorce Proceedings 26 Nov 2003 R (Respondent)Won	26 Nov 2003	R (Respondent): Judgment upheldThe decisions of the district judge were upheld. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
30	G v R: Custody Dispute - Welfare of Child, Parental Mental Health, and Tender Years Doctrine 08 Sep 2003 R (Respondent)Won	08 Sep 2003	R (Respondent): Custody GrantedSole custody, care and control of the son granted to the respondent (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
31	Lim Eng Beng v Siow Soon Kim: Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal 16 Jul 2003 Lim Eng Beng @ Lim Jia Le (Plaintiff)Partial	16 Jul 2003	Lim Eng Beng @ Lim Jia Le (Plaintiff): Extension granted for document delivery; payment already madeExtension granted for document delivery; payment of $221,894.75 already made. (Currency assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
32	Lim Eng Beng v Siow Soon Kim: Partnership Dispute Over Undistributed Assets and Profits 08 Jul 2003 Lim Eng Beng alias Lim Jia Le (Plaintiff)Won	08 Jul 2003	Lim Eng Beng alias Lim Jia Le (Plaintiff): Interlocutory Judgment for PlaintiffInterlocutory judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff with damages to be assessed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.
33	Public Prosecutor v Jamal anak Nyalau: Culpable Homicide Sentencing 18 Apr 2002 Jawi Anak Bukok (Defendant)Lost	18 Apr 2002	Jawi Anak Bukok (Defendant): ConvictedSentenced to six years and six months imprisonment; sentence backdated to the date of arrest ie 7 July 2001.
34	Zheng Song Bo v Tien Chee Tee: Breach of Trust over Desker Road Property Sale Proceeds 27 Sep 2001 Teh Siew Hoong (Defendant)Lost	27 Sep 2001	Teh Siew Hoong (Defendant): Claim DismissedClaim against the defendant was successful (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
35	Personal Automation Mart v Tan Swe Sang: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Negligence 05 Apr 2000 Tan Swe Sang (Defendant)Partial	05 Apr 2000	Tan Swe Sang (Defendant): Counterclaim Allowed in PartDefendant's counterclaim for unconsumed leave and arrears of salary was partially allowed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.