A Revi Shanker

A Revi Shanker is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in misuse of drugs act and appeal.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

A Revi Shanker has demonstrated expertise across 17 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal procedure and misuse of drugs act.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Procedure	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	A Revi Shanker has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	A Revi Shanker has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	A Revi Shanker has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	A Revi Shanker has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Witnesses	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	A Revi Shanker has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Abetment	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	A Revi Shanker has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	A Revi Shanker has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	A Revi Shanker has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	A Revi Shanker has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	A Revi Shanker has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	A Revi Shanker has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Inadequate Legal Assistance	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	A Revi Shanker has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Deficient Legal Services	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	A Revi Shanker has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	A Revi Shanker has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	A Revi Shanker has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Application for Adjournment	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	A Revi Shanker has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	A Revi Shanker has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

A Revi Shanker has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Independent Practitioner	1 cases	50% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Haridass: Conspiracy to Traffic Diamorphine & Inadequate Legal Assistance(Nov 2022)
ARShanker Law Chambers	1 cases	50% of cases	Hamzah bin Ibrahim v Public Prosecutor: Adjournment Application in Drug Trafficking Appeal(Aug 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of A Revi Shanker's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	50%
Other	13.0 parties avg	3.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2022	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of A Revi Shanker's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Neutral	1(50%)	50%
Other	1(50%)	50%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Other: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Public Prosecutor v Haridass: Conspiracy to Traffic Diamorphine & Inadequate Legal Assistance 15 Nov 2022 Haridass s/o Mohan (Defendant)Other	15 Nov 2022	Haridass s/o Mohan (Defendant): Application AllowedAccused allowed to recall Prosecution witnesses and give further evidence.
2	Hamzah bin Ibrahim v Public Prosecutor: Adjournment Application in Drug Trafficking Appeal 01 Aug 2018 Hamzah bin Ibrahim (Appellant)Neutral	01 Aug 2018	Hamzah bin Ibrahim (Appellant): Appeal AdjournedAppeal adjourned to an early date to be fixed, such date not to be before 16 August 2018.