A Sangeetha

A Sangeetha is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2015 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and misuse of drugs act. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 20% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

A Sangeetha has demonstrated expertise across 17 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal procedure and sentencing.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Procedure	4 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	A Sangeetha has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	4 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	A Sangeetha has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	4 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized79% relevance score	A Sangeetha has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized97% relevance score	A Sangeetha has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	A Sangeetha has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	A Sangeetha has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	A Sangeetha has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Culpable Homicide	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	A Sangeetha has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Murder	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	A Sangeetha has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Witnesses	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	A Sangeetha has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	A Sangeetha has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	A Sangeetha has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	A Sangeetha has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	A Sangeetha has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Transportation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	A Sangeetha has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	A Sangeetha has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	A Sangeetha has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

A Sangeetha has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Trident Law Corporation	5 cases	100% of cases	Public Prosecutor v S K Murugan: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Mar 2018) Tan Eck Hong v Maxz Universal: Minority Shareholder Oppression & Director's Duties(Nov 2017) Public Prosecutor v Govindasamy: Culpable Homicide Conviction for Death by Fire(Apr 2016)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of A Sangeetha's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.4
Complex Cases: 1 (20%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.0 parties avg	2.0	60%
Neutral	19.0 parties avg	9.0	20%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	19.0 parties avg	9.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of A Sangeetha's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(60%)	60%
Neutral	1(20%)	20%
Partial	1(20%)	20%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2017	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Public Prosecutor v S K Murugan: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 26 Mar 2018 S K Murugan Subrawmanian (Defendant)Lost	26 Mar 2018	S K Murugan Subrawmanian (Defendant): GuiltyThe accused was found guilty of trafficking diamorphine and sentenced to death.
2	Tan Eck Hong v Maxz Universal: Minority Shareholder Oppression & Director's Duties 30 Nov 2017 Lim Kwee Wah (Defendant)Neutral	30 Nov 2017	Lim Kwee Wah (Defendant): NeutralThe court made findings against Lim Kwee Wah, but did not make any orders directly against him. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Public Prosecutor v Govindasamy: Culpable Homicide Conviction for Death by Fire 18 Apr 2016 Govindasamy s/o Nallaiah (Defendant)Lost	18 Apr 2016	Govindasamy s/o Nallaiah (Defendant): LostConvicted of culpable homicide and sentenced to 10 years of imprisonment.
4	Koh Bak Kiang v Public Prosecutor: Revision of Conviction for Drug Trafficking 25 Feb 2016 Koh Bak Kiang (Applicant)Partial	25 Feb 2016	Koh Bak Kiang (Applicant): Convictions on the Disputed Charges set asideConvictions for trafficking in diamorphine were set aside and substituted with convictions for attempted trafficking in a Class A controlled drug other than diamorphine.
5	Public Prosecutor v Yogaras Poongavanam: Drug Importation, Courier Defence 23 Jul 2015 Yogaras Poongavanam (Defendant)Lost	23 Jul 2015	Yogaras Poongavanam (Defendant): Convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment and 15 strokes of the caneThe accused was found guilty and sentenced to life imprisonment and caning.