A Shahiran Anis Bin Mohamed Ibrahim

A Shahiran Anis Bin Mohamed Ibrahim is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2011 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in negligence and property law. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

A Shahiran Anis Bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated expertise across 21 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contracts and torts.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contracts	2 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	A Shahiran Anis Bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	A Shahiran Anis Bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	A Shahiran Anis Bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	A Shahiran Anis Bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	A Shahiran Anis Bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Damage	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	A Shahiran Anis Bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	A Shahiran Anis Bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Liquidated Damages	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	A Shahiran Anis Bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	A Shahiran Anis Bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	A Shahiran Anis Bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	A Shahiran Anis Bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	A Shahiran Anis Bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	A Shahiran Anis Bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Interest in land	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	A Shahiran Anis Bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	A Shahiran Anis Bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Tenancy in Common	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	A Shahiran Anis Bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trespass	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	A Shahiran Anis Bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Private nuisance	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	A Shahiran Anis Bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	A Shahiran Anis Bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Rylands v Fletcher Rule	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	A Shahiran Anis Bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	A Shahiran Anis Bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

A Shahiran Anis Bin Mohamed Ibrahim has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Asia Law Corporation	2 cases	100% of cases	Goh Rosaline v Goh Nellie: Trespass, Conspiracy & Land Rights Dispute(Jun 2021) Ho See Jui v Liquid Advertising: Negligence, Nuisance & Rylands v Fletcher in Water Damage Claim(Apr 2011)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of A Shahiran Anis Bin Mohamed Ibrahim's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.7
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	50%
Won	17.0 parties avg	7.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2011	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	17.0 parties avg	7.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of A Shahiran Anis Bin Mohamed Ibrahim's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	180,000.00	180,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Goh Rosaline v Goh Nellie: Trespass, Conspiracy & Land Rights Dispute 27 Jun 2021 Low Diau Ai (Defendant)Won	27 Jun 2021	Low Diau Ai (Defendant): Judgment in favor of DefendantJudgment in favor of the third defendant, Low Diau Ai. Costs fixed at $90,000, as well as reasonable disbursements to be fixed by me if not agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Ho See Jui v Liquid Advertising: Negligence, Nuisance & Rylands v Fletcher in Water Damage Claim 28 Apr 2011 Goh Sin Huat Electrical Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	28 Apr 2011	Goh Sin Huat Electrical Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the Defendant; damages to be assessed by the Registrar (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).