Abdul Rahman Bin Mohd Hanipah

Abdul Rahman Bin Mohd Hanipah is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2013 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 10 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and trust law. Their track record shows a 10.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 30% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Abdul Rahman Bin Mohd Hanipah has demonstrated expertise across 55 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	5 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Abdul Rahman Bin Mohd Hanipah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	4 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Abdul Rahman Bin Mohd Hanipah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	4 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Abdul Rahman Bin Mohd Hanipah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	4 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Abdul Rahman Bin Mohd Hanipah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	3 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Abdul Rahman Bin Mohd Hanipah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Abdul Rahman Bin Mohd Hanipah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Law	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Abdul Rahman Bin Mohd Hanipah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Abdul Rahman Bin Mohd Hanipah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Family Law	3 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice36% relevance score	Abdul Rahman Bin Mohd Hanipah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice17% relevance score	Abdul Rahman Bin Mohd Hanipah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Abdul Rahman Bin Mohd Hanipah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Equity	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Abdul Rahman Bin Mohd Hanipah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trusts	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Abdul Rahman Bin Mohd Hanipah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Presumed Resulting Trusts	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Abdul Rahman Bin Mohd Hanipah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Abdul Rahman Bin Mohd Hanipah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Abdul Rahman Bin Mohd Hanipah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Presumption of Advancement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Abdul Rahman Bin Mohd Hanipah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Abdul Rahman Bin Mohd Hanipah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Abdul Rahman Bin Mohd Hanipah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Quistclose trusts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Abdul Rahman Bin Mohd Hanipah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Proprietary restitution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Abdul Rahman Bin Mohd Hanipah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Property	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Abdul Rahman Bin Mohd Hanipah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Abdul Rahman Bin Mohd Hanipah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Common intention constructive trusts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Abdul Rahman Bin Mohd Hanipah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Abdul Rahman Bin Mohd Hanipah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Abdul Rahman Bin Mohd Hanipah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Abdul Rahman Bin Mohd Hanipah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Gifts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Abdul Rahman Bin Mohd Hanipah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Beneficial Ownership	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Abdul Rahman Bin Mohd Hanipah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Share Transfer	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Abdul Rahman Bin Mohd Hanipah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interest in land	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Abdul Rahman Bin Mohd Hanipah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Common intention	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Abdul Rahman Bin Mohd Hanipah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Abdul Rahman Bin Mohd Hanipah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary relationships	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Abdul Rahman Bin Mohd Hanipah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Abdul Rahman Bin Mohd Hanipah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unlawful trusts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Abdul Rahman Bin Mohd Hanipah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Consideration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Abdul Rahman Bin Mohd Hanipah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Courier	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Abdul Rahman Bin Mohd Hanipah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholder's Meeting	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Abdul Rahman Bin Mohd Hanipah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Resolution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Abdul Rahman Bin Mohd Hanipah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Blanket Authorisation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Abdul Rahman Bin Mohd Hanipah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Abdul Rahman Bin Mohd Hanipah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Abdul Rahman Bin Mohd Hanipah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Abdul Rahman Bin Mohd Hanipah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Abdul Rahman Bin Mohd Hanipah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sex Crimes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Abdul Rahman Bin Mohd Hanipah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Abdul Rahman Bin Mohd Hanipah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Forgery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Abdul Rahman Bin Mohd Hanipah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Minority Shareholder Rights	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Abdul Rahman Bin Mohd Hanipah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Abdul Rahman Bin Mohd Hanipah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Burden of proof	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Abdul Rahman Bin Mohd Hanipah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Oral Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Abdul Rahman Bin Mohd Hanipah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constructive trusts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Abdul Rahman Bin Mohd Hanipah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Abdul Rahman Bin Mohd Hanipah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Abdul Rahman Bin Mohd Hanipah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Abdul Rahman Bin Mohd Hanipah has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 8 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Abdul Rahman Law Corporation	8 cases	80% of cases	Zaiton v Nafsiah: Unjust Enrichment & Constructive Trusts in Family Dispute(Aug 2022) Public Prosecutor v BQD: Sexual Offences Against a Minor - Intra-Familial Abuse(Jul 2021) Lim Kieuh Huat v Lim Teck Leng: HDB Flat Ownership Dispute Involving Resulting and Constructive Trusts(Aug 2020)
J.R.B. Law LLP	2 cases	20% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Abdul Kahar bin Othman: Sentencing under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Oct 2013) Public Prosecutor v Abdul Kahar bin Othman: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Aug 2013)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Abdul Rahman Bin Mohd Hanipah's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.9
Complex Cases: 3 (30%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	13.0 parties avg	3.0	10%
Lost	63.0 parties avg	3.0	60%
Partial	23.0 parties avg	3.0	20%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	10%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2013	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	34.0 parties avg	4.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Abdul Rahman Bin Mohd Hanipah's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(10%)	10%
Lost	6(60%)	60%
Partial	2(20%)	20%
Won	1(10%)	10%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2013	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Dismissed: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 10 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Zaiton v Nafsiah: Unjust Enrichment & Constructive Trusts in Family Dispute 21 Aug 2022 Nafsiah bte Wagiman (Defendant)Dismissed	21 Aug 2022	Nafsiah bte Wagiman (Defendant): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed against the first defendant.
2	Public Prosecutor v BQD: Sexual Offences Against a Minor - Intra-Familial Abuse 26 Jul 2021 BQD (Defendant)Lost	26 Jul 2021	BQD (Defendant): Convicted on all chargesSentenced to 29 years' imprisonment and 24 strokes of the cane.
3	Lim Kieuh Huat v Lim Teck Leng: HDB Flat Ownership Dispute Involving Resulting and Constructive Trusts 31 Aug 2020 Leong Ah Chue (Plaintiff)Lost	31 Aug 2020	Leong Ah Chue (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiffs' claim for beneficial ownership of the Kim Tian Flat was dismissed. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Low Yin Ni v Tay Yuan Wei: Resulting Trusts, Presumption of Advancement & Family Law 08 Jun 2020 Tay Yuan Wei, Jaycie (formerly known as Tay Yeng Choo Jessy) (Respondent)Lost	08 Jun 2020	Tay Yuan Wei, Jaycie (formerly known as Tay Yeng Choo Jessy) (Respondent): Appeal LostAppeal lost; the parties hold their shares in the Flat in accordance with their direct financial contributions.
5	Mohammad Azli v PP: Trafficking, Misuse of Drugs Act & Abetment 22 Apr 2020 Roszaidi bin Osman (Appellant)Partial	22 Apr 2020	Roszaidi bin Osman (Appellant): Appeal against conviction dismissed; issue of sentence remittedRoszaidi's appeal against conviction was dismissed, but the issue of whether he qualified for alternative sentencing was remitted to the Judge.
6	Pereira v. Faridah: Resulting & Constructive Trusts in Property Dispute 12 Jul 2017 Faridah bte V Abdul Latiff (Defendant)Partial	12 Jul 2017	Faridah bte V Abdul Latiff (Defendant): Partial JudgmentThe Defendant and Plaintiff are joint tenants in equity in respect of the Changi Court property and the Toh Crescent property. The Plaintiff was declared the sole beneficial owner of the Aston Residence and the Queen’s Road HDB. The Plaintiff’s claim for losses or damages allegedly caused on occasion of the Defendant’s refusal to sign the re-financing documents was declined.
7	Tng Swee Seng v Lau Kim Swee: Dispute over Share Transfer Consideration and Alleged Forgery 03 Jul 2016 Tng Swee Seng (Plaintiff)Lost	03 Jul 2016	Tng Swee Seng (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim for $655,900.07 was dismissed due to failure to discharge the burden of proof.
8	PP v Chum Tat Suan: Statutory Relief for Drug Couriers under Misuse of Drugs Act 27 Nov 2014 Abdul Kahar bin Othman (Respondent)Lost	27 Nov 2014	Abdul Kahar bin Othman (Respondent): Finding quashedThe Judge’s findings that Abdul Kahar’s involvement in committing the offences under ss 5(1) and 7 of the MDA respectively fell within the ambit of ss 33B(2)(a) and 33B(3)(a) ought to be quashed.
9	Public Prosecutor v Abdul Kahar bin Othman: Sentencing under the Misuse of Drugs Act 23 Oct 2013 Abdul Kahar bin Othman (Defendant)Won	23 Oct 2013	Abdul Kahar bin Othman (Defendant): Benefit of the doubt givenThe accused was given the benefit of the doubt and treated as a courier under the new sentencing provisions of the Misuse of Drugs Act.
10	Public Prosecutor v Abdul Kahar bin Othman: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 26 Aug 2013 Abdul Kahar bin Othman (Defendant)Lost	26 Aug 2013	Abdul Kahar bin Othman (Defendant): GuiltyThe accused was found guilty of the two charges.