Abhinav Ratan Mohan

Abhinav Ratan Mohan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2019 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and criminal law. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Abhinav Ratan Mohan has demonstrated expertise across 13 primary practice areas, with significant experience in arbitration and commercial law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Arbitration	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Abhinav Ratan Mohan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Abhinav Ratan Mohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Abhinav Ratan Mohan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Abhinav Ratan Mohan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Abhinav Ratan Mohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized100% relevance score	Abhinav Ratan Mohan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Abhinav Ratan Mohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Abhinav Ratan Mohan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Abhinav Ratan Mohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Abhinav Ratan Mohan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Party Autonomy	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Abhinav Ratan Mohan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Joinder of Parties	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Abhinav Ratan Mohan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Double Separability	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Abhinav Ratan Mohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Abhinav Ratan Mohan has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP	1 cases	50% of cases	Moad Fadzir v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking, Common Intention, and Abetment under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Nov 2019)
Shook Lin & Bok LLP	1 cases	50% of cases	CJD v CJE and CJF: Dispute over Joinder of Third Parties in Arbitration under LCIA Rules(Mar 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Abhinav Ratan Mohan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	50%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2019	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Abhinav Ratan Mohan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	23,000.00	23,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	CJD v CJE and CJF: Dispute over Joinder of Third Parties in Arbitration under LCIA Rules 18 Mar 2021 CJF (Defendant)Won	18 Mar 2021	CJF (Defendant): Successful defenseSuccessful defense against the originating summons. The plaintiff was ordered to pay costs to the defendants fixed at $11,500 together with reasonable disbursements (to be agreed and failing agreement, taxed) for OS 1446 and SUM 1075. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Moad Fadzir v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking, Common Intention, and Abetment under the Misuse of Drugs Act 24 Nov 2019 Moad Fadzir bin Mustaffa (Appellant)Lost	24 Nov 2019	Moad Fadzir bin Mustaffa (Appellant): Appeal DismissedMoad Fadzir's appeal against his conviction for drug trafficking was dismissed.