Abigail Tang En-Ping

Abigail Tang En-Ping is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and insolvency law. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Abigail Tang En-Ping has demonstrated expertise across 19 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Abigail Tang En-Ping has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Abigail Tang En-Ping has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Abigail Tang En-Ping has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Abigail Tang En-Ping has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Abigail Tang En-Ping has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Abigail Tang En-Ping has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Abigail Tang En-Ping has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Abigail Tang En-Ping has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Abigail Tang En-Ping has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Abigail Tang En-Ping has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Abigail Tang En-Ping has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Abigail Tang En-Ping has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Abigail Tang En-Ping has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Abigail Tang En-Ping has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Abigail Tang En-Ping has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Abigail Tang En-Ping has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Legal Advice Privilege	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Abigail Tang En-Ping has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Abigail Tang En-Ping has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Abigail Tang En-Ping has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Abigail Tang En-Ping has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rev Law LLC	3 cases	100% of cases	RB Investments v Kardachi: Legal Advice Privilege & Bankruptcy Investigation(Sep 2023) Agency for Policy Coordination v Batbold: Freezing Order Dispute in Mongolia Secret Profit Scheme(Apr 2021) Agency for Policy Coordination v Batbold: Authority to Act & Warrant in Civil Procedure(Feb 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Abigail Tang En-Ping's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 9.1
Complex Cases: 3 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Neutral	28.5 parties avg	8.5	67%
Partial	110.0 parties avg	10.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	210.0 parties avg	10.0
2023	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Abigail Tang En-Ping's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Neutral	2(67%)	67%
Partial	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2023	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	RB Investments v Kardachi: Legal Advice Privilege & Bankruptcy Investigation 28 Sep 2023 Wong Shaw Mooi (Respondent)Neutral	28 Sep 2023	Wong Shaw Mooi (Respondent): NeutralMs. Wong did not object to RBI's prayers.
2	Agency for Policy Coordination v Batbold: Freezing Order Dispute in Mongolia Secret Profit Scheme 15 Apr 2021 Erdenes Oyu Tolgoi LLC (Plaintiff)Partial	15 Apr 2021	Erdenes Oyu Tolgoi LLC (Plaintiff): Freezing order discharged against the fifth and sixth defendantsThe freezing order was discharged against the fifth and sixth defendants, but remains in place against the other defendants.
3	Agency for Policy Coordination v Batbold: Authority to Act & Warrant in Civil Procedure 25 Feb 2021 Erdenes Oyu Tolgoi LLC (Plaintiff)Neutral	25 Feb 2021	Erdenes Oyu Tolgoi LLC (Plaintiff): Plaintiffs are duly and properly representedThe court held that the plaintiffs are duly and properly represented by Rev Law. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.