Abirame S

Abirame S is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2022 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in costs and security for costs. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Abirame S has demonstrated expertise across 15 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil practice and costs.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Practice	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Abirame S has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Abirame S has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Abirame S has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Abirame S has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Abirame S has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Security for Costs	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized98% relevance score	Abirame S has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Abirame S has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Abirame S has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Abirame S has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Debt Recovery	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Abirame S has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Abirame S has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Abirame S has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Abirame S has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Abirame S has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Abirame S has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Abirame S has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
DennisMathiew	1 cases	33% of cases	VMax Marine v Singapore Salvage: Appeal on Salvage Contract & Costs Order Dispute(Aug 2024)
Asia Ascent Law Corporation	1 cases	33% of cases	Cova Group v Advanced Submarine Networks: Security for Costs in Construction Equipment Rental Dispute(Jun 2023)
Metropolitan Law Corporation	1 cases	33% of cases	Song Jianbo v Sunmax Global Capital Fund 1 Pte Ltd: Winding Up Order for Inability to Pay Debts(Sep 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Abirame S's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.7
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	24.0 parties avg	4.0	67%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2022	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2023	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Abirame S's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(67%)	67%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	25,000.00	12,500.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	VMax Marine v Singapore Salvage: Appeal on Salvage Contract & Costs Order Dispute 14 Aug 2024 VMax Marine Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	14 Aug 2024	VMax Marine Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal to vary the District Judge's costs order declinedThe court declined to exercise its discretion to vary the District Judge's costs order.
2	Cova Group v Advanced Submarine Networks: Security for Costs in Construction Equipment Rental Dispute 26 Jun 2023 Tiong Woon Offshore Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Won	26 Jun 2023	Tiong Woon Offshore Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Security for Costs GrantedSecurity for costs granted in the amount of $25,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Song Jianbo v Sunmax Global Capital Fund 1 Pte Ltd: Winding Up Order for Inability to Pay Debts 19 Sep 2022 Sunmax Global Capital Fund 1 Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	19 Sep 2022	Sunmax Global Capital Fund 1 Pte Ltd (Defendant): Winding up order grantedWinding up order granted against the defendant. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of the jurisdiction.