Adam Maniam

Type of Practice: General Practice
Total Cases Handled: 3 judgments

Adam Maniam is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2010 to 2012. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in contract law and rent review. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Adam Maniam has demonstrated expertise across 14 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and arbitration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	16% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Adam Maniam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 16% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Adam Maniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	2 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Adam Maniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Rent Review	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Adam Maniam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Good Faith	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Adam Maniam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Adam Maniam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Adam Maniam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Investment Agreement	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Adam Maniam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Adam Maniam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Valuation	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Adam Maniam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Adam Maniam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Valuation Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Adam Maniam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Leasing	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Adam Maniam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Forum Non Conveniens	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Adam Maniam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Adam Maniam has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	3 cases	100% of cases	HSBC v Toshin: Good Faith, Rent Review, and Valuer Independence(Aug 2012) HSBC v Toshin: Rent Review Mechanism Dispute in Ngee Ann City Lease(Jan 2012) JIO Minerals FZC v Mineral Enterprises Ltd: Forum Non Conveniens & Misrepresentation(Nov 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Adam Maniam's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.2
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	33.2 parties avg	3.2	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2012	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Adam Maniam's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	3(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	HSBC v Toshin: Good Faith, Rent Review, and Valuer Independence 26 Aug 2012 Toshin Development Singapore Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	26 Aug 2012	Toshin Development Singapore Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; each party to bear its own costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	HSBC v Toshin: Rent Review Mechanism Dispute in Ngee Ann City Lease 12 Jan 2012 Toshin Development Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	12 Jan 2012	Toshin Development Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application DismissedPlaintiff's application was dismissed with costs to the defendant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	JIO Minerals FZC v Mineral Enterprises Ltd: Forum Non Conveniens & Misrepresentation 10 Nov 2010 JIO Minerals FZC (Appellant, Defendant)Won	10 Nov 2010	JIO Minerals FZC (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed with costs.