Adeline Chong Seow Ming

Adeline Chong Seow Ming is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2003 to 2010. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in insurance and personal injury. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Adeline Chong Seow Ming has demonstrated expertise across 30 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and automobile accidents.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Adeline Chong Seow Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Adeline Chong Seow Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Adeline Chong Seow Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Adeline Chong Seow Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Construction Accidents	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Adeline Chong Seow Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Adeline Chong Seow Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Construction Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Adeline Chong Seow Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Insurance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Adeline Chong Seow Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Adeline Chong Seow Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Patents	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Adeline Chong Seow Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Adeline Chong Seow Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Pleadings	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Adeline Chong Seow Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Work Injury Compensation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Adeline Chong Seow Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Adeline Chong Seow Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Adeline Chong Seow Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Adeline Chong Seow Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contributory negligence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Adeline Chong Seow Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Vicarious liability	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Adeline Chong Seow Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Witnesses	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Adeline Chong Seow Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Adeline Chong Seow Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Adeline Chong Seow Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Adeline Chong Seow Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Adeline Chong Seow Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Workplace accident	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Adeline Chong Seow Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Law of Pleadings	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Adeline Chong Seow Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Double Insurance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Adeline Chong Seow Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Cross Liability	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Adeline Chong Seow Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Employer's Liability	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Adeline Chong Seow Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Adeline Chong Seow Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Principles governing extension of time	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Adeline Chong Seow Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Adeline Chong Seow Ming has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Infinitus Law Corporation	2 cases	67% of cases	SHC Capital Ltd v NTUC Income: Double Insurance & Workmen's Compensation(Aug 2010) Main-Line Corporate Holdings Ltd v United Overseas Bank Ltd: Patent Infringement & Interim Payment(Mar 2010)
Harry Elias Partnership	1 cases	33% of cases	Hua Sheng Tao v Welltech Construction: Leave to Appeal & Amount in Dispute(Feb 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Adeline Chong Seow Ming's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	33%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	33%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2003	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2010	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Adeline Chong Seow Ming's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(25%)	25%
Neutral	1(25%)	25%
Won	2(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	2,280,089.00	760,029.673 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2003	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%)
2010	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	SHC Capital Ltd v NTUC Income: Double Insurance & Workmen's Compensation 04 Aug 2010 SHC Capital Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	04 Aug 2010	SHC Capital Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffNTUC is legally obligated to reimburse SHC for the sum of $317,664.70 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore), which was paid by SHC to indemnify EIN and Simei for their liability arising out of Suit 527 of 2006.
2	Main-Line Corporate Holdings Ltd v United Overseas Bank Ltd: Patent Infringement & Interim Payment 02 Mar 2010 Main-Line Corporate Holdings Ltd (Appellant)Won	02 Mar 2010	Main-Line Corporate Holdings Ltd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; UOB to pay Main-Line $1,962,424.30 as interim payment (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Hua Sheng Tao v Welltech Construction: Leave to Appeal & Amount in Dispute 23 Feb 2003 Transbilt Engineering Pte Ltd (Defendant)Neutral	23 Feb 2003	Transbilt Engineering Pte Ltd (Defendant): Leave to Appeal GrantedLeave was granted to the second defendant to appeal. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.