Adeline Foo

Adeline Foo is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2001. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in charitable giving and causation. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Adeline Foo has demonstrated expertise across 17 primary practice areas, with significant experience in specific performance and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Specific performance	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Adeline Foo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Adeline Foo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Adeline Foo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Charitable Giving	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Adeline Foo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Adeline Foo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Adeline Foo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Adeline Foo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Adeline Foo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Adeline Foo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty of Care	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Adeline Foo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Adeline Foo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Medical Negligence	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Adeline Foo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Charity Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Adeline Foo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Power of Sale	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Adeline Foo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Citizenship	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice1% relevance score	Adeline Foo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Adeline Foo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Adeline Foo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Adeline Foo has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Lee & Lee	4 cases	100% of cases	Yeo Peng Hock Henry v Pai Lily: Costs Settlement in Appeal(Nov 2001) Yeo Peng Hock Henry v Pai Lily: Medical Negligence, Doctor's Duty of Care & Causation(Oct 2001) Chileon v Choong Wai Phwee: Trustees' Power to Sell Property & Equitable Estoppel(Mar 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Adeline Foo's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2001	32.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Adeline Foo's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(50%)	50%
Neutral	1(25%)	25%
Won	1(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2001	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Yeo Peng Hock Henry v Pai Lily: Costs Settlement in Appeal 06 Nov 2001 Yeo Peng Hock Henry (Appellant)Neutral	06 Nov 2001	Yeo Peng Hock Henry (Appellant): Refund of deposit in courtOrder for the refund of the deposit in court, with interest, if any, to Dr Yeo or his solicitors (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Yeo Peng Hock Henry v Pai Lily: Medical Negligence, Doctor's Duty of Care & Causation 25 Oct 2001 Yeo Peng Hock Henry (Appellant)Won	25 Oct 2001	Yeo Peng Hock Henry (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; the judgment below was set aside, and Ms. Pai's claim was dismissed.
3	Chileon v Choong Wai Phwee: Trustees' Power to Sell Property & Equitable Estoppel 06 Mar 2001 Chileon Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	06 Mar 2001	Chileon Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. The deposit as security for costs, with interest, if any, is to be paid to the respondents or their solicitors to account of costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Choong Wai Phwee v Chileon: Charity Trustees' Power of Sale & Specific Performance 25 Jul 2000 Chileon Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	25 Jul 2000	Chileon Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment against the Defendant; specific performance of the agreement to sell was ordered (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).