Adeline Lee Huay Yen

Adeline Lee Huay Yen is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2007 to 2008. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil procedure and res judicata.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Adeline Lee Huay Yen has demonstrated expertise across 7 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and jurisdiction.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	2 cases	25% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Adeline Lee Huay Yen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 25% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Adeline Lee Huay Yen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Adeline Lee Huay Yen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Adeline Lee Huay Yen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Adeline Lee Huay Yen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Third Party Claims	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Adeline Lee Huay Yen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Adeline Lee Huay Yen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Adeline Lee Huay Yen has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
TSMP Law Corporation	2 cases	100% of cases	Ng Kit Har v Yii Chee Ming: Third-Party Proceedings & Validity of Third-Party Notice Service(Feb 2008) Banque Nationale de Paris v Ng Kit Har: Third-Party Notice, Res Judicata & Delay(Jun 2007)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Adeline Lee Huay Yen's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.5 parties avg	2.5	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2007	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Adeline Lee Huay Yen's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2007	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ng Kit Har v Yii Chee Ming: Third-Party Proceedings & Validity of Third-Party Notice Service 25 Feb 2008 Ng Kit Har (Appellant)Lost	25 Feb 2008	Ng Kit Har (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Banque Nationale de Paris v Ng Kit Har: Third-Party Notice, Res Judicata & Delay 27 Jun 2007 Ng Kit Har (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	27 Jun 2007	Ng Kit Har (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal against the order setting aside the reinstatement of third party notices was dismissed.