Adrian Aw

Adrian Aw is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2008 to 2012. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in easements and insurance bad faith. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Adrian Aw has demonstrated expertise across 17 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and construction law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Adrian Aw has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Adrian Aw has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Easements	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Adrian Aw has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Insurance	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Adrian Aw has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Insurance Bad Faith	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Adrian Aw has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Adrian Aw has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Adrian Aw has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Workers Compensation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Adrian Aw has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Adrian Aw has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Adrian Aw has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Adrian Aw has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Statutory Duty	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Adrian Aw has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Occupiers' Liability	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Adrian Aw has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Declaratory relief	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Adrian Aw has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Ship Repair	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Adrian Aw has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Adrian Aw has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Shipbuilding	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Adrian Aw has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Adrian Aw has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Gurbani & Co.	2 cases	67% of cases	Rahman v Lim Keenly Builders: Workmen's Compensation & Insurance Coverage for Subcontractor Employees(May 2010) Penguin Boat v Royal & Sun Alliance: Shiprepairers Policy & Liability for Cradle Failure(Jun 2008)
Incisive Law LLC	1 cases	33% of cases	Botanica Pte Ltd v Management Corporation: Realignment of Easement & Injunctive Relief(May 2012)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Adrian Aw's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Won	22.5 parties avg	2.5	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Adrian Aw's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Won	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	10,000.00	10,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2008	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Botanica Pte Ltd v Management Corporation: Realignment of Easement & Injunctive Relief 07 May 2012 Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 2040 (Defendant)Lost	07 May 2012	Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 2040 (Defendant): Striking Out Application DismissedThe defendant's application to strike out the plaintiff's claim was dismissed with costs of $10,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Rahman v Lim Keenly Builders: Workmen's Compensation & Insurance Coverage for Subcontractor Employees 06 May 2010 Tokio Marine Insurance Singapore Ltd (Respondent)Won	06 May 2010	Tokio Marine Insurance Singapore Ltd (Respondent): WonThe claim by the defendant against the Insurer is dismissed with costs.
3	Penguin Boat v Royal & Sun Alliance: Shiprepairers Policy & Liability for Cradle Failure 05 Jun 2008 Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance (Singapore) Ltd (Defendant)Won	05 Jun 2008	Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance (Singapore) Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe court found in favor of the defendant, dismissing the plaintiff's claim.