Adrian Loo Yu Hao

Adrian Loo Yu Hao is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2013 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in misuse of drugs act and costs. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 20% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Adrian Loo Yu Hao has demonstrated expertise across 28 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and administrative law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	4 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Adrian Loo Yu Hao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Adrian Loo Yu Hao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Adrian Loo Yu Hao has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Adrian Loo Yu Hao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Adrian Loo Yu Hao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Adrian Loo Yu Hao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Appeal	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Adrian Loo Yu Hao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Adrian Loo Yu Hao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Adrian Loo Yu Hao has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Adrian Loo Yu Hao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Adrian Loo Yu Hao has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Discovery of documents	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Adrian Loo Yu Hao has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Adrian Loo Yu Hao has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Appeals	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Adrian Loo Yu Hao has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Adrian Loo Yu Hao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Adrian Loo Yu Hao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bail Review	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Adrian Loo Yu Hao has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Principles	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Adrian Loo Yu Hao has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Leave	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Adrian Loo Yu Hao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Adrian Loo Yu Hao has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Leave to commence judicial review	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Adrian Loo Yu Hao has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Adrian Loo Yu Hao has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Appeals	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Adrian Loo Yu Hao has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Adrian Loo Yu Hao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Adrian Loo Yu Hao has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Dispute Resolution	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Adrian Loo Yu Hao has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Adrian Loo Yu Hao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Adrian Loo Yu Hao has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Adrian Loo Yu Hao has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	5 cases	100% of cases	PP v Low Sze Song: Trafficking of Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act(Apr 2023) Roslan bin Bakar v Public Prosecutor: Costs for Frivolous Criminal Motion and Judicial Review Appeal(Jul 2022) Pannir Selvam v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of Public Prosecutor's Decision on Certificate of Substantive Assistance(Apr 2020)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Adrian Loo Yu Hao's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.2
Complex Cases: 1 (20%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	53.2 parties avg	3.2	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2023	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Adrian Loo Yu Hao's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	5(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	9,000.00	9,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	PP v Low Sze Song: Trafficking of Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act 13 Apr 2023 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	13 Apr 2023	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionThe court found both accused guilty of the charges.
2	Roslan bin Bakar v Public Prosecutor: Costs for Frivolous Criminal Motion and Judicial Review Appeal 26 Jul 2022 Attorney-General (Respondent, Defendant)Won	26 Jul 2022	Attorney-General (Respondent, Defendant): Costs awardedCosts of $4,000 awarded against Mr. Yeo. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Pannir Selvam v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of Public Prosecutor's Decision on Certificate of Substantive Assistance 23 Apr 2020 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	23 Apr 2020	Attorney-General (Respondent): Application dismissedThe application for leave to commence judicial review proceedings was dismissed.
4	Pannir Selvam v Attorney-General: Application for Discovery of Documents in Judicial Review Proceedings 16 Sep 2019 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	16 Sep 2019	Attorney-General (Respondent): Application DismissedApplication for discovery and leave to serve interrogatories dismissed.
5	Public Prosecutor v Hang Tuah bin Jumaat: Sexual Offence and Road Traffic Act Violation 28 Jan 2013 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	28 Jan 2013	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused convicted on both charges.