Adrian Ng

Adrian Ng is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2003 to 2004. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and family law. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Adrian Ng has demonstrated expertise across 22 primary practice areas, with significant experience in chancery and equity and civil practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Adrian Ng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Adrian Ng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Adrian Ng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Adrian Ng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Security for Costs	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Adrian Ng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Adrian Ng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Adrian Ng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Adrian Ng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Adrian Ng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Drink Driving	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Adrian Ng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Adrian Ng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Adrian Ng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Adrian Ng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Adrian Ng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Adrian Ng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Disclosure of documents	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Adrian Ng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Adrian Ng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Variation of Order	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Adrian Ng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Adrian Ng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Interim Preservation Order	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Adrian Ng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Interim Orders	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Adrian Ng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breathalyser Test	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Adrian Ng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Adrian Ng has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tan Peng Chin LLC	2 cases	67% of cases	Lim Kaling v Hangchi Valerie: Interim Preservation Order for US$1.5 Million Transferred Before Marriage(Nov 2004) Sakata v Naruse: Security for Costs Appeal After Change of Solicitors(May 2004)
Rajah and Tann	1 cases	33% of cases	Lim Eng Guan Derek v Public Prosecutor: Failure to Provide Breath Specimen & Driving Without Due Care(Dec 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Adrian Ng's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 13.3
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	67%
Partial	119.0 parties avg	19.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	215.6 parties avg	15.6

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Adrian Ng's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(67%)	67%
Partial	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lim Kaling v Hangchi Valerie: Interim Preservation Order for US$1.5 Million Transferred Before Marriage 11 Nov 2004 Lim Kaling (Plaintiff)Lost	11 Nov 2004	Lim Kaling (Plaintiff): Application disallowedPlaintiff's application for an interim preservation order was disallowed.
2	Sakata v Naruse: Security for Costs Appeal After Change of Solicitors 13 May 2004 Netlock Technologies Japan KK (Plaintiff)Partial	13 May 2004	Netlock Technologies Japan KK (Plaintiff): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part; the court varied the assistant registrar’s orders by apportioning $50,000 (to cover the second defendant’s costs) from the sum of $375,000 and by setting aside the order for the provision of a further sum of $300,000. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Lim Eng Guan Derek v Public Prosecutor: Failure to Provide Breath Specimen & Driving Without Due Care 02 Dec 2003 Lim Eng Guan Derek (Appellant)Lost	02 Dec 2003	Lim Eng Guan Derek (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.