Adrian Teo

Adrian Teo is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2014 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in building and construction contracts and construction law.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Adrian Teo has demonstrated expertise across 21 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and torts.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Adrian Teo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Adrian Teo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Adrian Teo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Business Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Adrian Teo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Adrian Teo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Adrian Teo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Adrian Teo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Adrian Teo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Adrian Teo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Adrian Teo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Adrian Teo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Adrian Teo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Adrian Teo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Lump sum contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Adrian Teo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Variations	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Adrian Teo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Unincorporated Associations	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Adrian Teo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Scope of Works	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Adrian Teo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Sub-contracts	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Adrian Teo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Adrian Teo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Club Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Adrian Teo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Adrian Teo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Adrian Teo has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
DL Law Corporation	1 cases	50% of cases	Comfort Management v OGSP Engineering: Building Contract Dispute over Lump Sum Contract and Sub-contractor Claims(Aug 2020)
ACIES Law Corporation	1 cases	50% of cases	Lawrence Khong v Singapore Polo Club: Apparent Bias in Disciplinary Proceedings(Apr 2014)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Adrian Teo's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	13.0 parties avg	3.0	50%
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Adrian Teo's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(50%)	50%
Lost	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	8,000.00	4,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Dismissed: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Comfort Management v OGSP Engineering: Building Contract Dispute over Lump Sum Contract and Sub-contractor Claims 05 Aug 2020 PINTU KUMAR SARKER (Defendant)Dismissed	05 Aug 2020	PINTU KUMAR SARKER (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff’s claim against the second defendant is dismissed.
2	Lawrence Khong v Singapore Polo Club: Apparent Bias in Disciplinary Proceedings 20 Apr 2014 Singapore Polo Club (Defendant)Lost	20 Apr 2014	Singapore Polo Club (Defendant): Decision to suspend Plaintiff's membership set asideThe court set aside the decision to suspend the Plaintiff's membership and awarded costs of $8,000 inclusive of disbursements to the Plaintiff. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.