Aedit Abdullah

Aedit Abdullah is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2014. The lawyer has handled 26 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 6 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and constitutional law. Their track record shows a 69.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 15% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Aedit Abdullah has demonstrated expertise across 50 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	22 cases	16% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Aedit Abdullah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 22 cases which represents 16% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	18 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Aedit Abdullah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 18 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	10 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Aedit Abdullah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	9 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized94% relevance score	Aedit Abdullah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	8 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Aedit Abdullah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 8 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence	6 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Aedit Abdullah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Aedit Abdullah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Aedit Abdullah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Aedit Abdullah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Aedit Abdullah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Theft	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Aedit Abdullah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Aedit Abdullah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Human Sexuality	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Aedit Abdullah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Aedit Abdullah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Locus Standi	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Aedit Abdullah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Aedit Abdullah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Aedit Abdullah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Aedit Abdullah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Corruption Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Aedit Abdullah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Aedit Abdullah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Money and moneylenders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Aedit Abdullah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Aedit Abdullah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Aedit Abdullah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abetment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Aedit Abdullah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Aedit Abdullah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Aedit Abdullah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Aedit Abdullah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of Statements	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Aedit Abdullah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Aedit Abdullah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Aedit Abdullah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Money Laundering	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Aedit Abdullah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraudulent Trading	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Aedit Abdullah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Cheating	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Aedit Abdullah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Hearsay	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Aedit Abdullah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Declaratory relief	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Aedit Abdullah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mens rea	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Aedit Abdullah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Multi-Level Marketing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Aedit Abdullah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Voluntariness of Statements	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Aedit Abdullah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Human Rights	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Aedit Abdullah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contingent Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Aedit Abdullah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Presidential Clemency	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Aedit Abdullah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commutation of Sentence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Aedit Abdullah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Life Imprisonment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Aedit Abdullah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Undercover Operations	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Aedit Abdullah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Aedit Abdullah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Ad Hoc Admission	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized100% relevance score	Aedit Abdullah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Aedit Abdullah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
White Collar Crime	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Aedit Abdullah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Outrage of Modesty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized99% relevance score	Aedit Abdullah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Aedit Abdullah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Aedit Abdullah has been affiliated with 6 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 18 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	18 cases	69% of cases	PP v Chum Tat Suan: Statutory Relief for Drug Couriers under Misuse of Drugs Act(Nov 2014) Lim Meng Suang v Attorney-General: Constitutionality of Section 377A and Equal Protection(Oct 2014) Jeyaretnam v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of Loan to IMF under Article 144 of Constitution(Oct 2013)
Deputy Public Prosecutor	4 cases	15% of cases	Yip Min-Ting v Public Prosecutor: Theft Conviction Appeal & Probation Order(Jan 2010) PP v Muhammad Ali Hashim: Trafficking Diamorphine - Misuse of Drugs Act(Apr 2001) Yusof bin A Samad v PP: Corruption by Police Hearse Driver & Admissibility of Statements(Sep 2000)
Public Prosecutor	1 cases	4% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Khor Soon Lee: Importation of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Dec 2009)
Deputy Public Prosecutors	1 cases	4% of cases	Muhammad Afzal Khan v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking Conspiracy(Jun 2001)
Attorney-General Chambers	1 cases	4% of cases	Tan Eng Hong v Attorney-General: Constitutionality of Section 377A of Penal Code(Mar 2011)
Deputy Public Proseutor	1 cases	4% of cases	Teo Kian Leong v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Law, Statutory Interpretation(Dec 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Aedit Abdullah's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 4 (15%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	33.0 parties avg	3.0	12%
Neutral	23.5 parties avg	3.5	8%
Partial	23.0 parties avg	3.0	8%
Remanded	13.0 parties avg	3.0	4%
Won	182.2 parties avg	2.2	69%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2001	32.7 parties avg	2.7
2009	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	72.9 parties avg	2.9
2012	52.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	42.5 parties avg	2.5
2014	23.5 parties avg	3.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Aedit Abdullah's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(12%)	12%
Neutral	2(8%)	8%
Partial	2(8%)	8%
Remanded	1(4%)	4%
Won	18(69%)	69%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.007 cases	7

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2001	3 12	Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2009	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	7 223	Lost: 2 cases (28.6%) Neutral: 2 cases (28.6%) Won: 3 cases (42.9%)
2012	5 14	Lost: 1 cases (20.0%) Won: 4 cases (80.0%)
2013	4 4	Won: 4 cases (100.0%)
2014	2 11	Remanded: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 26 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	PP v Chum Tat Suan: Statutory Relief for Drug Couriers under Misuse of Drugs Act 27 Nov 2014 Public Prosecutor (Applicant)Remanded	27 Nov 2014	Public Prosecutor (Applicant): Cases remitted to the JudgeThe cases concerning Abdul Kahar and Chum were remitted to the Judge, who shall determine whether Abdul Kahar’s and Chum’s involvement in the offences under ss 5(1) and 7 of the MDA respectively was restricted to the activities under ss 33B(2)(a) and 33B(3)(a).
2	Lim Meng Suang v Attorney-General: Constitutionality of Section 377A and Equal Protection 27 Oct 2014 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	27 Oct 2014	Attorney-General (Respondent): Appeals DismissedAppeals dismissed; no order as to costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Jeyaretnam v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of Loan to IMF under Article 144 of Constitution 30 Oct 2013 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	30 Oct 2013	Attorney-General (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Tan Eng Hong v Attorney-General: Constitutionality of Section 377A Penal Code & LGBTQ Rights 01 Oct 2013 Attorney-General (Defendant)Won	01 Oct 2013	Attorney-General (Defendant): Application dismissedThe Plaintiff's application was dismissed.
5	Re Lord Goldsmith: Ad Hoc Admission & Constitutionality of Section 377A Penal Code 18 Sep 2013 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	18 Sep 2013	Attorney-General (Respondent): Opposition UpheldThe Attorney-General's opposition to the application was upheld.
6	Lim Meng Suang v Attorney-General: Constitutionality of Section 377A & LGBTQ+ Rights 08 Apr 2013 Attorney-General (Defendant)Won	08 Apr 2013	Attorney-General (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim that s 377A is unconstitutional and infringes their rights under Art 12 was dismissed.
7	Phang Wah v PP: Fraudulent Trading under Companies Act & Public Interest Law 22 Oct 2012 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	22 Oct 2012	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal; the reference was dismissed.
8	Jeyaretnam v Attorney-General: MAS Loan to IMF & Constitutionality 21 Oct 2012 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	21 Oct 2012	Attorney-General (Respondent): WonApplication for leave to apply for prerogative orders and declarations was dismissed with costs.
9	Dinesh Pillai v PP: Misuse of Drugs Act & Presumption of Knowledge in Drug Importation 28 Aug 2012 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	28 Aug 2012	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Application DismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended against the application to set aside the conviction and sentence.
10	Dinesh Pillai v PP: Importation of Diamorphine and Rebuttal of Statutory Presumption 03 Apr 2012 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	03 Apr 2012	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the conviction for importing diamorphine.
11	Mathavakannan v Attorney-General: Interpretation of 'Life Imprisonment' in Presidential Clemency 26 Feb 2012 Attorney-General (Defendant)Lost	26 Feb 2012	Attorney-General (Defendant): Unfavourable Interpretation of Commutation OrderThe court declared that the President’s commutation order for the Plaintiff to be “imprisoned for life” referred to an imprisonment term of 20 years, contrary to the Defendant's position.
12	Phang Wah v Public Prosecutor: Fraudulent Trading, CBT, Falsification of Accounts 20 Nov 2011 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Neutral	20 Nov 2011	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Cross-appeal dismissedCross-appeal against sentences dismissed.
13	PP v Koh Seah Wee & Lim Chai Meng: Public Servants' Corruption & Cheating 03 Nov 2011 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Lost	03 Nov 2011	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Sentenced to imprisonmentThe accused were sentenced to imprisonment.
14	Muhammad bin Kadar v Public Prosecutor: Clarification of Prosecution's Duty to Disclose Unused Material 25 Aug 2011 Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Applicant)Neutral	25 Aug 2011	Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Applicant): Clarification of judgmentThe court clarified the scope of the Prosecution's duty of disclosure.
15	Ramalingam Ravinthran v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of Drug Trafficking Conviction Based on Alleged Discriminatory Prosecution 30 May 2011 Attorney-General (Defendant)Won	30 May 2011	Attorney-General (Defendant): Application dismissedThe plaintiff's application for a mandatory order against the Attorney-General was dismissed. No order was made with respect to costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
16	Khor Soon Lee v PP: Rebutting Presumption of Knowledge in Drug Importation 14 Apr 2011 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	14 Apr 2011	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal AllowedThe Court of Appeal allowed the appeal.
17	Yong Vui Kong v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of Clemency Power 03 Apr 2011 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	03 Apr 2011	Attorney-General (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal.
18	Tan Eng Hong v Attorney-General: Constitutionality of Section 377A of Penal Code 14 Mar 2011 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	14 Mar 2011	Attorney-General (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs to the Attorney-General. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
19	Yip Min-Ting v Public Prosecutor: Theft Conviction Appeal & Probation Order 18 Jan 2010 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	18 Jan 2010	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): PartialAppeal against conviction dismissed; fine of $1,500 substituted with a probation order of six months and 40 hours of community service.
20	Public Prosecutor v Khor Soon Lee: Importation of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 30 Dec 2009 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	30 Dec 2009	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionThe accused was convicted.
21	Public Prosecutor v Heng Swee Weng: Outrage of Modesty & Sentencing Principles for Public Transport Users 02 Dec 2009 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won	02 Dec 2009	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe Prosecution's appeal was allowed, and the sentence of the District Judge was set aside.
22	Teo Kian Leong v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Law, Statutory Interpretation 06 Dec 2001 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	06 Dec 2001	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed; the Public Prosecutor prevailed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
23	Muhammad Afzal Khan v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking Conspiracy 18 Jun 2001 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	18 Jun 2001	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Conviction and sentence upheldThe Court of Appeal upheld the conviction and sentence imposed by the High Court.
24	PP v Muhammad Ali Hashim: Trafficking Diamorphine - Misuse of Drugs Act 20 Apr 2001 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Partial	20 Apr 2001	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): PartialConviction of the first and second accused, but acquittal of the third accused.
25	Yusof bin A Samad v PP: Corruption by Police Hearse Driver & Admissibility of Statements 03 Sep 2000 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	03 Sep 2000	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal by Yusof bin A Samad was dismissed.
26	Selvarajan James v PP: Abetment of Theft, Adducing Fresh Evidence, Criminal Procedure, Sentencing 20 Aug 2000 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	20 Aug 2000	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against conviction and sentence was dismissed.