Aileen Boey

Type of Practice: General Practice
Total Cases Handled: 6 judgments

Aileen Boey is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2003. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in bills of lading act and letters of credit. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Aileen Boey has demonstrated expertise across 27 primary practice areas, with significant experience in bills of lading act and shipping law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Bills of Lading Act	4 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Aileen Boey has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	4 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Aileen Boey has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	4 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Aileen Boey has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Aileen Boey has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Aileen Boey has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Aileen Boey has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Forum Non Conveniens	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Aileen Boey has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Letters of Credit	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Aileen Boey has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Aileen Boey has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Aileen Boey has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Aileen Boey has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Aileen Boey has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Natural forum	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Aileen Boey has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Set-off	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Aileen Boey has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Aileen Boey has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Aileen Boey has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Aileen Boey has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Aileen Boey has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Loss of Amenities	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Aileen Boey has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Pain and Suffering	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Aileen Boey has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Aileen Boey has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Documentary Credit	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Aileen Boey has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Aileen Boey has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Aileen Boey has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Aileen Boey has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Aileen Boey has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Aileen Boey has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Aileen Boey has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann	3 cases	50% of cases	Golden Shore Transportation v UCO Bank: Stay of Proceedings & Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause(Oct 2003) UCO Bank v Golden Shore Transportation: Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause & Forum Non Conveniens(Jun 2003) UCO Bank v Golden Orient Maritime: Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause & Forum Non Conveniens(Jun 2003)
Joseph Tan Jude Benny	2 cases	33% of cases	PT Adaro Indonesia v Rabobank: Dispute over Letter of Credit & Refusal of Payment(May 2002) The Patraikos 2: Cargo Damage Claim - Breach of Hague Rules & Seaworthiness(May 2002)
Joseph Tan Jude Benny Anne Choo	1 cases	17% of cases	Tan Kok Lam v Hong Choon Peng: Damages for Loss of Amenities for Unconscious Plaintiff in Negligence Claim(Apr 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Aileen Boey's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	42.0 parties avg	2.0	67%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	32.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Aileen Boey's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(67%)	67%
Won	2(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	80,000.00	26,666.673 cases	3
USD	1,297,255.06	1,297,255.061 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2003	3 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Golden Shore Transportation v UCO Bank: Stay of Proceedings & Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause 22 Oct 2003 Golden Shore Transportation Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	22 Oct 2003	Golden Shore Transportation Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs.
2	UCO Bank v Golden Shore Transportation: Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause & Forum Non Conveniens 24 Jun 2003 Golden Shore Transportation Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Lost	24 Jun 2003	Golden Shore Transportation Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Stay of action soughtGolden Shore Transportation Pte Ltd sought a stay of action, but the appeal was allowed. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
3	UCO Bank v Golden Orient Maritime: Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause & Forum Non Conveniens 24 Jun 2003 Golden Orient Maritime Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Lost	24 Jun 2003	Golden Orient Maritime Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedDefendant's appeal was dismissed.
4	PT Adaro Indonesia v Rabobank: Dispute over Letter of Credit & Refusal of Payment 27 May 2002 Rabobank (Defendant)Lost	27 May 2002	Rabobank (Defendant): Claim DismissedJudgment against the Defendant for US$1,297,255.06 with interest at 6% per annum from the date of the writ till payment.
5	The Patraikos 2: Cargo Damage Claim - Breach of Hague Rules & Seaworthiness 08 May 2002 shippers of cargo (Plaintiff)Won	08 May 2002	shippers of cargo (Plaintiff): Claim AllowedInterlocutory judgment for the plaintiffs on their claim, with costs on a standard basis. The registrar is directed to assess the plaintiffs' claim with the costs of such assessment to be reserved to the registrar. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Tan Kok Lam v Hong Choon Peng: Damages for Loss of Amenities for Unconscious Plaintiff in Negligence Claim 18 Apr 2001 Tan Kok Lam (next friend to Teng Eng) (Appellant)Won	18 Apr 2001	Tan Kok Lam (next friend to Teng Eng) (Appellant): Appeal allowedAppeal allowed, restoring the assistant registrar's award of $80,000 for loss of amenities. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.