Ajaib Haridass

Type of Practice: General Practice
Total Cases Handled: 7 judgments

Ajaib Haridass is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in conspiracy by unlawful means and fraud and deceit. Their track record shows a 57.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 43% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ajaib Haridass has demonstrated expertise across 28 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	6 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Ajaib Haridass has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Ajaib Haridass has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Ajaib Haridass has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Conversion	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Ajaib Haridass has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence	3 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Ajaib Haridass has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Ajaib Haridass has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Ajaib Haridass has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Ajaib Haridass has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ajaib Haridass has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Ajaib Haridass has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Bailment	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ajaib Haridass has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Ajaib Haridass has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Ajaib Haridass has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Voyage Charterparty	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ajaib Haridass has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Lien	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ajaib Haridass has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bills of Lading Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ajaib Haridass has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Collections	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ajaib Haridass has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ajaib Haridass has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ajaib Haridass has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ajaib Haridass has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ajaib Haridass has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ajaib Haridass has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ajaib Haridass has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Carriage of goods by sea	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ajaib Haridass has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ajaib Haridass has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Demurrage	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ajaib Haridass has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bills of Lading	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ajaib Haridass has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shipbuilding Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ajaib Haridass has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ajaib Haridass has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 7 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Haridass Ho & Partners	7 cases	100% of cases	Oro Negro Drilling v Integradora: Anti-Suit Injunction, Director's Duties & Concurso Proceedings(Feb 2019) EFT Holdings v Marinteknik: Conspiracy, Unlawful Means, and Investment Loss(Dec 2012) Raiffeisen Zentralbank v Archer Daniels Midland: Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Conspiracy Claim(Oct 2006)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ajaib Haridass's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.8
Complex Cases: 3 (43%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	28.9 parties avg	8.9	29%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	14%
Won	44.8 parties avg	4.8	57%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2002	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2012	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2019	110.0 parties avg	10.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ajaib Haridass's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(29%)	29%
Partial	1(14%)	14%
Won	4(57%)	57%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2002	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2006	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Oro Negro Drilling v Integradora: Anti-Suit Injunction, Director's Duties & Concurso Proceedings 14 Feb 2019 Oro Negro Impetus Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	14 Feb 2019	Oro Negro Impetus Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Setting Aside Application granted againstThe Setting Aside Application was granted against the Plaintiff.
2	EFT Holdings v Marinteknik: Conspiracy, Unlawful Means, and Investment Loss 10 Dec 2012 Marinteknik Shipbuilders (S) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	10 Dec 2012	Marinteknik Shipbuilders (S) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the Defendant; Plaintiff's claim dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Raiffeisen Zentralbank v Archer Daniels Midland: Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Conspiracy Claim 31 Oct 2006 Toepfer International-Asia Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	31 Oct 2006	Toepfer International-Asia Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Faith Maritime v Feoso: Demurrage, Bills of Lading & Cargo Conversion Dispute 30 Sep 2002 Feoso (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	30 Sep 2002	Feoso (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claims DismissedFeoso’s claims against the Owner of the Vessel are dismissed.
5	Keppel Tatlee Bank v Bandung Shipping: Striking Out Claim for Breach of Contract of Carriage 08 Mar 2002 Keppel Tatlee Bank Limited (Plaintiff, Appellant)Partial	08 Mar 2002	Keppel Tatlee Bank Limited (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartAppeal allowed in part; certain parts of the statement of claim to be struck out instead. Costs of the appeal and the hearing below awarded to the Plaintiffs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Abani Trading v PT Delta Karina & Poh Fang: Inducement of Breach of Contract & Conversion 11 Oct 2001 Abani Trading Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	11 Oct 2001	Abani Trading Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages to be assessed by the Registrar (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Abani Trading v PT Delta Karina: Inducement of Breach & Conversion in Charterparty Dispute 11 Oct 2001 Abani Trading Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	11 Oct 2001	Abani Trading Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim allowedThe court found in favor of Abani Trading Pte Ltd, with damages to be assessed by the Registrar.