Alagappan s/o Arunasalam

Type of Practice: General Practice
Total Cases Handled: 5 judgments

Alagappan s/o Arunasalam is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2007 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in matrimonial assets and division of assets. Their track record shows a 40.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Alagappan s/o Arunasalam has demonstrated expertise across 26 primary practice areas, with significant experience in family law and matrimonial assets.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Family Law	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Alagappan s/o Arunasalam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Alagappan s/o Arunasalam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Alagappan s/o Arunasalam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Alagappan s/o Arunasalam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Alagappan s/o Arunasalam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Alagappan s/o Arunasalam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Proprietary Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Alagappan s/o Arunasalam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trusts and Estates	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Alagappan s/o Arunasalam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Gifts Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Alagappan s/o Arunasalam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Alagappan s/o Arunasalam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Wife)	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Alagappan s/o Arunasalam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Child)	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Alagappan s/o Arunasalam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Alagappan s/o Arunasalam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Alagappan s/o Arunasalam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Alagappan s/o Arunasalam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Strata Titles	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Alagappan s/o Arunasalam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Alagappan s/o Arunasalam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Alagappan s/o Arunasalam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Alagappan s/o Arunasalam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trust	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Alagappan s/o Arunasalam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Alagappan s/o Arunasalam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Gifts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Alagappan s/o Arunasalam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Alagappan s/o Arunasalam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Alagappan s/o Arunasalam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Alagappan s/o Arunasalam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Alagappan s/o Arunasalam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Alagappan s/o Arunasalam has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
A Alagappan Law Corporation	4 cases	80% of cases	WHM v WHN: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Wife Maintenance Dispute(Jan 2018) BMM v BMN: Resulting Trusts, Gifts, and Proprietary Estoppel in Property Ownership Dispute(May 2017) TLB v TLC: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Child Maintenance Dispute(Mar 2016)
A Alagappan & Co	1 cases	20% of cases	Management Corporation v Hyundai: Strata Titles, Common Property & Window Rectification(May 2007)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Alagappan s/o Arunasalam's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.2
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	20%
Partial	22.0 parties avg	2.0	40%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	40%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2007	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Alagappan s/o Arunasalam's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(20%)	20%
Partial	2(40%)	40%
Won	2(40%)	40%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2007	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	WHM v WHN: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Wife Maintenance Dispute 23 Jan 2018 WHN (Respondent, Plaintiff)Partial	23 Jan 2018	WHN (Respondent, Plaintiff): Appeal dismissed in partThe respondent's claim that the appellant had taken $232,600 worth of antiques was not fully accepted. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	BMM v BMN: Resulting Trusts, Gifts, and Proprietary Estoppel in Property Ownership Dispute 28 May 2017 BMM (Plaintiff, Respondent)Won	28 May 2017	BMM (Plaintiff, Respondent): Originating Summons No 240 of 2015 AllowedBMM's claim that BMN holds her share as joint tenant in a property on resulting trust for him is allowed.
3	TLB v TLC: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Child Maintenance Dispute 03 Mar 2016 TLB (Appellant, Wife)Partial	03 Mar 2016	TLB (Appellant, Wife): Appeal allowed in partThe wife's appeal was allowed in part, varying the order for division of the matrimonial flat such that the wife would receive 45% of the net sale proceeds.
4	Thu Aung Zaw v Norb Creative Studio: Guarantee, Consideration, and Setting Aside Statutory Demand 14 Apr 2014 Thu Aung Zaw (Appellant)Won	14 Apr 2014	Thu Aung Zaw (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed, statutory demand set aside (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Management Corporation v Hyundai: Strata Titles, Common Property & Window Rectification 10 May 2007 K.S.M. Engineering Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	10 May 2007	K.S.M. Engineering Pte Ltd (Defendant): Declaration AgainstDeclaration made against the defendant that the management corporation had a duty to maintain the windows until 1 April 2005 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).