Albert Teo

Albert Teo is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2007 to 2011. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in land law and property law. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Albert Teo has demonstrated expertise across 13 primary practice areas, with significant experience in land law and property law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Land Law	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Albert Teo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Albert Teo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Albert Teo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Albert Teo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Trust	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Albert Teo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Albert Teo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Right of Pre-emption	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Albert Teo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Albert Teo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Albert Teo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Right of first refusal	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Albert Teo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Funeral Expenses	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Albert Teo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Caveatable Interest	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Albert Teo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Albert Teo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Albert Teo has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
PKWA Law Practice LLC	2 cases	67% of cases	Oh Chun Moy v Oh Bee Bee: Trustees Act - Accounting and Distribution of Estate Assets(Sep 2011) Ong Chay Tong & Sons v Ong Hoo Eng: Variation of Contract & Caveatable Interest for Right of Pre-emption(Oct 2008)
PKWA Law Practive LLC	1 cases	33% of cases	Ong Chay Tong & Sons v Ong Hoo Eng: Caveat Dispute over Right of First Refusal(Oct 2007)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Albert Teo's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.4
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	33.4 parties avg	3.4	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2007	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Albert Teo's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	3(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	2,400.00	800.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2007	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Oh Chun Moy v Oh Bee Bee: Trustees Act - Accounting and Distribution of Estate Assets 29 Sep 2011 Oh Chun Moy (Plaintiff)Won	29 Sep 2011	Oh Chun Moy (Plaintiff): Orders grantedOrders granted in terms of prayers (a), (b), (c) and (d) and awarded costs of $800 to the plaintiffs excluding disbursements which would be paid on a reimbursement basis by the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Ong Chay Tong & Sons v Ong Hoo Eng: Variation of Contract & Caveatable Interest for Right of Pre-emption 23 Oct 2008 Ong Hoo Eng (Respondent)Won	23 Oct 2008	Ong Hoo Eng (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; respondent awarded one-third of the costs of the appeal (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Ong Chay Tong & Sons v Ong Hoo Eng: Caveat Dispute over Right of First Refusal 18 Oct 2007 Ong Hoo Eng (Defendant)Won	18 Oct 2007	Ong Hoo Eng (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the Defendant; costs awarded against the Plaintiff. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.