Alcina Chew

Alcina Chew is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2014 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and resulting trusts. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Alcina Chew has demonstrated expertise across 48 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	7 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice36% relevance score	Alcina Chew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	4 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Alcina Chew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Alcina Chew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contracts	3 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice22% relevance score	Alcina Chew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice31% relevance score	Alcina Chew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Alcina Chew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Alcina Chew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Alcina Chew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Alcina Chew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Alcina Chew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Alcina Chew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trusts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Alcina Chew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Alcina Chew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Alcina Chew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Alcina Chew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Alcina Chew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Knowing Receipt	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Alcina Chew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Alcina Chew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Alcina Chew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Alcina Chew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Further and better particulars	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Alcina Chew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Presumption of Advancement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Alcina Chew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Alcina Chew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Crossclaims	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Alcina Chew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Alcina Chew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Dishonest assistance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Alcina Chew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Alcina Chew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual Interpretation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Alcina Chew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Joint bank accounts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Alcina Chew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Alcina Chew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Accessory liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Alcina Chew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Workplace Safety and Health	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Alcina Chew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Alcina Chew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Res ipsa loquitur	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Alcina Chew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unlawful means conspiracy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Alcina Chew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fire Safety Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Alcina Chew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Pleading	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Alcina Chew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unauthorized Trading	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Alcina Chew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Alcina Chew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Alcina Chew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equitable Compensation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Alcina Chew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Alcina Chew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insurance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Alcina Chew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Alcina Chew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Alcina Chew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Alcina Chew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Pleadings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Alcina Chew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Damage	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Alcina Chew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Alcina Chew has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 8 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tan Kok Quan Partnership	8 cases	100% of cases	Khoo v Khoo: Resulting Trusts & Survivorship in Joint Accounts Dispute(Oct 2023) Arovin Ltd v Hadiran Sridjaja: Document Production, Relevance, and Legal Privilege(Sep 2019) Arovin Ltd v Hadiran Sridjaja: Dispute over Pleadings and Requests for Further and Better Particulars(Nov 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Alcina Chew's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.6
Complex Cases: 4 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	15.0 parties avg	5.0	13%
Lost	25.5 parties avg	5.5	25%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	13%
Won	44.7 parties avg	4.7	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	35.5 parties avg	5.5
2017	19.0 parties avg	9.0
2018	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2019	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2023	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Alcina Chew's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(13%)	13%
Lost	2(25%)	25%
Partial	1(13%)	13%
Won	4(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,767,958.97	294,659.836 cases	6
USD	8,127,664.02	8,127,664.021 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	3 3	Won: 3 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Dismissed: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 8 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Khoo v Khoo: Resulting Trusts & Survivorship in Joint Accounts Dispute 30 Oct 2023 Khoo Phaik Ean Patricia (Defendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim)Dismissed	30 Oct 2023	Khoo Phaik Ean Patricia (Defendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim): Counterclaim DismissedCounterclaim for a declaration that the Defendants jointly hold the legal and beneficial interest to the entire balance of the moneys in the Joint Accounts was dismissed.
2	Arovin Ltd v Hadiran Sridjaja: Document Production, Relevance, and Legal Privilege 09 Sep 2019 Arovin Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	09 Sep 2019	Arovin Ltd (Plaintiff): PartialThe court ordered production of documents relating to the sharing of liabilities arising out of any guarantee and/or exit option demanded by EDBI in respect of the Initial PCOA, but declined to order production in respect of Request 11 and Request 12. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Arovin Ltd v Hadiran Sridjaja: Dispute over Pleadings and Requests for Further and Better Particulars 11 Nov 2018 Arovin Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	11 Nov 2018	Arovin Ltd (Plaintiff): Application grantedThe defendant shall pay the plaintiffs’ costs of the application, assessed at S$3,000 plus reasonable disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	United Overseas Bank v Lippo Marina Collection: Discovery, Litigation & Without Prejudice Privilege 14 Jun 2017 United Overseas Bank Limited (Plaintiff)Lost	14 Jun 2017	United Overseas Bank Limited (Plaintiff): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed; litigation privilege in the Affidavit subsists and was not waived.
5	Te Deum Engineering v Grace Electrical: Negligence, Fire, and Res Ipsa Loquitur 18 Oct 2016 Te Deum Engineering Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	18 Oct 2016	Te Deum Engineering Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff in the amount of $1,584,091.52 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Beyonics Technology Ltd v Goh Chan Peng: Breach of Fiduciary Duty and Conspiracy 27 Jun 2016 Beyonics Technology Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	27 Jun 2016	Beyonics Technology Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages awarded in the amount of $8,127,664.02 (assumed USD, as the judgment originates from Singapore and the amounts are specified in USD).
7	UOB v Lippo Marina: Attribution of Fraudulent Employee Knowledge & Summary Determination of Law 21 Feb 2016 United Overseas Bank Limited (Plaintiff, Appellant)Won	21 Feb 2016	United Overseas Bank Limited (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; both applications (determination of law and striking out) granted. Costs of $5,000 awarded to the plaintiff (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	Chandra Winata Lie v Citibank: Pleading Requirements for Unauthorised Trading Claims 02 Dec 2014 Chandra Winata Lie (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	02 Dec 2014	Chandra Winata Lie (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal DismissedPlaintiff’s appeal dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).