Alec Tan

Type of Practice: General Practice
Total Cases Handled: 4 judgments

Alec Tan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2013 to 2014. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract and criminal procedure. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Alec Tan has demonstrated expertise across 24 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and corruption, drug trafficking and other serious crimes (confiscation of benefits) act.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Alec Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Alec Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Alec Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Alec Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Alec Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Alec Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Alec Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Alec Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Alec Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Alec Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Alec Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Alec Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy to Defraud	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Alec Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Alec Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Falsification of Documents	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Alec Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Alec Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Inspection of Accounting Records	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Alec Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Guarantees	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Alec Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Alec Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bonus	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Alec Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Alec Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Alec Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Alec Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Alec Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Alec Tan has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann LLP	4 cases	100% of cases	PP v Li Weiming: Criminal Case Disclosure, Intent to Defraud, Falsification of Accounts(Jan 2014) Brader v Commerzbank: Enforceability of Discretionary Bonus Promises & Contractual Obligations(Jan 2014) Ong Hong Kiat v RIQ Pte Ltd: Share Transfer Dispute & Right to Inspect Company Records(Jul 2013)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Alec Tan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 2 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Partial	24.0 parties avg	4.0	50%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2013	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2014	23.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Alec Tan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(25%)	25%
Partial	2(50%)	50%
Won	1(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2013	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2014	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	PP v Li Weiming: Criminal Case Disclosure, Intent to Defraud, Falsification of Accounts 22 Jan 2014 Lim Ai Wah (Respondent)Partial	22 Jan 2014	Lim Ai Wah (Respondent): Orders for particulars set asideThe court set aside the Judge’s orders that the PP provide the respondents with (a) the identity of the persons whom the respondents allegedly conspired to defraud and (b) the reasons why the subcontract between ZTE and Questzone was allegedly fictitious.
2	Brader v Commerzbank: Enforceability of Discretionary Bonus Promises & Contractual Obligations 06 Jan 2014 Commerzbank AG (Defendant)Lost	06 Jan 2014	Commerzbank AG (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantPlaintiffs' claim for breach of contract is allowed. The Defendant is to pay the Plaintiffs the bonuses declared on Letter Day, less the 10% that was paid out on 19 February 2009. In addition, pre-judgment interest at the rate of 5.33% per annum on these sums is to be paid to the Plaintiffs beginning 19 February 2009 and ending on the date of this decision. Costs are to follow the event, to be taxed if not agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Ong Hong Kiat v RIQ Pte Ltd: Share Transfer Dispute & Right to Inspect Company Records 16 Jul 2013 RIQ Pte Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff)Won	16 Jul 2013	RIQ Pte Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff): Application GrantedMr. Lim's application for an order that Mr. Ong transfers 175,000 shares in RIQ registered under him to Mr. Lim was granted.
4	Li Weiming v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Revision on Prosecution's Discovery Obligations 26 Mar 2013 Lim Ai Wah (Applicant)Partial	26 Mar 2013	Lim Ai Wah (Applicant): Application for particulars granted in partApplication for particulars granted in part; further particulars ordered regarding the identity of the defrauded party and the fictitious sub-contract.