Aleksandar Georgiev

Aleksandar Georgiev is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Aleksandar Georgiev has demonstrated expertise across 8 primary practice areas, with significant experience in arbitration and civil practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Arbitration	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Aleksandar Georgiev has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Aleksandar Georgiev has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Aleksandar Georgiev has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Aleksandar Georgiev has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Aleksandar Georgiev has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Aleksandar Georgiev has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Setting aside leave to enforce	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Aleksandar Georgiev has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Duty of full and frank disclosure	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Aleksandar Georgiev has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Aleksandar Georgiev has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	1 cases	100% of cases	National Oilwell Varco Norway AS v Keppel FELS: Setting Aside Leave to Enforce Arbitration Award Due to Non-Existent Party(Jun 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Aleksandar Georgiev's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Aleksandar Georgiev's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	20,000.00	20,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	National Oilwell Varco Norway AS v Keppel FELS: Setting Aside Leave to Enforce Arbitration Award Due to Non-Existent Party 10 Jun 2021 National Oilwell Varco Norway AS (formerly known as Hydralift AS) (Plaintiff)Lost	10 Jun 2021	National Oilwell Varco Norway AS (formerly known as Hydralift AS) (Plaintiff): Application DismissedPlaintiff's application to enforce the arbitration award was dismissed, and the plaintiff was ordered to pay the defendant's costs fixed at $20,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).